Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

At donor advised charitable giving, inc., our mission is to increase charitable giving in the united states by offering advantageous ways to give useful information and unbiased guidance.

$8.9B
Granted FY2025still arriving
64,697
Grants FY2025still arriving
54
States reached
$977M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$9.6BReligion$4.6BPhilanthropy$4.6BHealth$2.6BArts & Culture$2.4BInternational$2.2BEnvironment$1.2BHuman Services$1.0BOther$0
02FY2025 · 64697 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 64,697 grants below total $8,622,080,209 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,872,852,963 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $250,772,754 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14854 grants · $104M
  • $10k–50k33690 grants · $714M
  • $50k–250k12536 grants · $1.3B
  • $250k+3617 grants · $6.5B
$19,170
Median grant
54
States reached
$47.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$976,570,217
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$272,403,517
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$161,539,525
RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$155,395,322
85 FUND$148,300,000
LUCAS MUSEUM OF NARRATIVE ART$93,000,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES$89,665,347
UCSF FOUNDATION$62,403,766
50CAN INC$58,981,430
CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION$54,611,500
GLOBAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT$53,948,094
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$49,296,424
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC$47,215,290
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS$46,642,412
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$40,859,706
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $260.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIRACLE MESSAGES: $2.6M → 10%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $10.9M → 13%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $23.1M → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $15.4M → 7%VAPOR THRIFT STORE: $3.6M → 18%YOUTH TOWN OF TENNESSEE INC: $2.0M → 15%ATLAS MINISTRY INC: $4.1M → 14%GLOBAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT: $64.9M → 10%PILTCH FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $2.3M → 8%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $2.0M → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $12.0M → 9%REALIZE IMPACT: $2.7M → 10%GLOBAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT: $43.9M → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2.9M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $8.0M → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2.1M → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS: $5.7M → 9%GLOBAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT: $9.4M → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS: $4.8M → 9%FRIENDS OF TAVARUA: $3.7M → 14%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2.2M → 10%VILLAGE NETWORK OF PETALUMA: $2.5M → 8%GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $8.0M → 17%GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $3.9M → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $6.7M → 14%GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $2.3M → 17%GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $2.0M → 17%GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $2.0M → 17%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $2.3M → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $2.1M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15.5B · 1792 repeat orgs$221M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

1792 repeat relationships — 1728 still active in FY2025, 64 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1792
23

Total granted

$15.5B
$90M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
0%

Still filing today

83%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.0B · revenue +64%
  • LM
    LUCAS MUSEUM OF NARRATIVE ART
    5× · 2017–2025 · $721M · revenue +41%
  • T8
    THE 85 FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $591M · revenue +25% · 99% of their budget

Funded once

  • WM
    WAIMEA MALAMA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8.5M
  • NS
    NEW SCHOOLS FOR BATON ROUGEgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $7.6M · revenue +170%
  • EB
    ENGINEERING BIOLOGY RESEARCH CONSORTIUM
    one grant, 2022 · $7.0M · revenue -87% · 96% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…

—
2
United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—
3
University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education
4
Philadelphia University

To improve lives and provide students with exceptional value in 21st century professional education.

Education
5
Columbia College

Columbia College improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.

Education
7
Claremont Graduate University

A private, independent, nonprofit institution of higher learning that is a high research activity university awarding master's and doctoral degrees within its five schools and three independent departments.

Education
8
Westminster University

Offer undergraduate and graduate degrees in liberal arts and professional programs.

Education
9
New York Academy of Sciences

To advance scientific knowledge and to increase the number of scientifically informed individuals.

—
10
San Francisco State University

To provide private financial support to assist the university in meeting its educational mission.

Education
11
Oklahoma City University

Oklahoma city university prepares all learners to create, lead and serve.

Education
12
University of the Sciences in

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders in the sciences. see sch. ouniversity of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Basic Fund and the most unlike its peers is The Tech Interactive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportYouth Sports ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Jewish Community Organizati…Dance Arts OrganizationsSenior Support ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesYouth Development CentersWomen & Girls Leadership De…Animal Rescue and ShelterChristian Youth CampsDevelopmental Disabilities …Food Banks and PantriesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Elementary Literacy TutoringAffordable Housing Developm…Community Food PantriesEquine Therapy ProgramsSchool District FoundationsFaith-Based Social ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsImmigrant Worker SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportAffordable Housing Construc…Public Library OperationsYmca Youth DevelopmentYouth Development ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local History MuseumsCommunity Arts CentersCancer Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesEnvironmental Conservation …Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%35%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%811/90,065
the rest of the field
12%
205,353/1,729,500

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1700 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1700 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

198
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
239
Early backer (in before they grew)
1682/1700
Grantees still filing
1382/1700
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $2,013,438,812 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $441,242,405 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANF…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $328,957,665 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FO…+59 more — $2,368,382,302 · Education+59 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $559,464,563 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTH…Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $341,108,071 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Chari…MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $195,875,853 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GL…AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $152,322,022 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMEN…ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $132,235,850 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILA…IMPACTASSETSINC — $84,941,377 · Philanthropy+23 more — $725,828,881 · Philanthropy+23 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,502,915,606 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INV…BROWN UNIVERSITY — $88,664,870 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVER…+1 more — $13,527,450 · Community ImprovementTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS — $154,546,047 · OtherThe Broad Institute Inc — $147,033,390 · OtherSchmidt Ocean Institute — $232,000,000 · OtherSchmidt Ocean InstituteGLOBAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT — $213,926,194 · OtherGLOBAL SUPPORT AND DEVE…+74 more — $2,169,845,437 · Other+74 moreLUCAS MUSEUM OF NARRATIVE ART — $721,488,876 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $37,037,520 · Arts & CultureREST OF WORLD MEDIA INC — $34,970,991 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $93,360,591 · Arts & CultureMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $109,713,438 · InternationalVITAL STRATEGIES INC — $107,118,110 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $59,325,253 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $46,818,133 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $39,526,138 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC — $39,024,340 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated — $31,861,440 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $25,852,883 · InternationalCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA — $23,836,668 · InternationalSpirit of America Worldwide — $23,100,014 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $22,373,299 · InternationalACUMEN FUND INC — $21,965,790 · International+6 more — $99,252,349 · InternationalTHE 85 FUND — $591,050,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $15,730,573 · Crime & Legal
Education$5,152,021,184Philanthropy$2,191,776,617Community Improvement$1,605,107,926Other$2,917,351,068Arts & Culture$886,857,978International$649,767,855Crime & Legal$606,780,573

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $2,013,438,812 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,502,915,606 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetTHE 85 FUND — $591,050,000 over 4y, 99% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $559,464,563 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $441,242,405 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $341,108,071 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $328,957,665 over 8y, 12% of budgetSchmidt Ocean Institute — $232,000,000 over 7y, 98% of budgetGLOBAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT — $213,926,194 over 5y, 82% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $195,875,853 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $167,386,671 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $165,953,944 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $165,245,736 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $152,322,022 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc — $147,033,390 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $132,235,850 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $120,832,656 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $109,713,438 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetVITAL STRATEGIES INC — $107,118,110 over 8y, 26% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $95,396,295 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $88,664,870 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $84,941,377 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION — $82,674,600 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $81,403,412 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GEORGE LUCAS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $80,956,420 over 8y, 98% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $80,065,606 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCornell University — $74,178,163 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $72,898,434 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetDECHOMAI ASSET TRUST — $72,441,669 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION — $70,174,844 over 8y, 15% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $69,192,681 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $65,653,523 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $65,323,889 over 8y, 12% of budgetYale University — $64,982,460 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $62,528,500 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $61,624,979 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $60,858,777 over 8y, 0.2% of budget50CAN INC — $59,965,430 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $59,936,969 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $59,325,253 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $58,095,095 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $57,651,628 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $56,421,431 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $55,519,530 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $53,593,291 over 8y, 30% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $53,136,433 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $51,628,517 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $50,171,321 over 8y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds LUCAS MUSEUM OF NARRATIVE ART ↗
  • Who funds THE 85 FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Schmidt Ocean Institute ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds VITAL STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE LUCAS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds DECHOMAI ASSET TRUST ↗
  • Who funds KIPP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
  • Who funds GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Elkind Family Foundat…The Feibusch Foundati…Penner Family Foundat…D and R FundIrish Fellowship Educ…Waterproof Foundation…Barlow Family Foundat…CfleadsOtis & Elizabeth Chan…Shearwater Foundation…The Dale and Leslie C…Altsheler-Durell Foun…
Elkind Family FoundationCA9.2× affinity30 shared granteesties to 1 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Elkind Family Foundation · The Feibusch Foundation · Penner Family Foundation Inc · D and R Fund · Irish Fellowship Educational & Cultural Foundation · Waterproof Foundation Inc · Barlow Family Foundation · Cfleads · Otis & Elizabeth Chandler Foundation · Shearwater Foundation Inc · The Dale and Leslie Chihuly Foundation · Altsheler-Durell Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Conservancy Inc — 27% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Digital Harbor Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home