Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS

REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS (California) receives grants from 39 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,817,078 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($9,440,681). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 90% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$19M
Funders on record
39
Grants received
$13M
Net assets
$21M
22/39 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%
01What it does

What Redwood Gospel Missions does

Mission

The Redwood Gospel Missions, in the grace and power of jesus christ, mobilize our community to minister to the needy so that lives are transformed.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Temporary overnight housing for homeless men, 24 hour temporary housing for women & children; 12 to 18 month alcohol/drug recovery for both men & women; community outreach events to homeless individuals & low income families; job training skills through various certification programs offered at all the service locations & at thrift stores. Free clothing & household items are available on request to homeless & low income families.

    $7,742,476 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $7,742,476.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.7M) Expenses 100 ($4.5M) Net assets 100 ($1.4M)2018 Revenue 123 ($5.8M) Expenses 115 ($5.2M) Net assets 142 ($2.1M)2019 Revenue 130 ($6.1M) Expenses 127 ($5.7M) Net assets 174 ($2.5M)2020 Revenue 243 ($11M) Expenses 138 ($6.2M) Net assets 538 ($7.8M)2021 Revenue 151 ($7.1M) Expenses 131 ($5.9M) Net assets 625 ($9.0M)2022 Revenue 160 ($7.5M) Expenses 133 ($5.9M) Net assets 686 ($9.9M)2023 Revenue 172 ($8.1M) Expenses 183 ($8.1M) Net assets 709 ($10M)2024 Revenue 162 ($7.6M) Expenses 175 ($7.8M) Net assets 742 ($11M)2025 Revenue 406 ($19M) Expenses 202 ($9.0M) Net assets 1468 ($21M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (406)Expenses (202)Net assets (1468)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $11M to $23M (+101%).

$4.7M
$5.3M
$5.6M
$11M
$11M
$10M
$11M
$11M
$23M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2025 2%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (13% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 881 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$236k
’17
$613k
’18
$449k
’19
$5.3M
’20
$1.3M
’21
$1.6M
’22
−$68k
’23
−$237k
’24
$10M
’25
0.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jeffrey W Gilman

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed91010101111111312
Joined·+1+0+0+1+1+0+2+0
No longer listed·00001001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 12 funders to 16 funders, grant income rose $340k → $488k.

13 of 39 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 90% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 39 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 74% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

91% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS.

74%
largest funder
88%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 41% · 2018 33% · 2019 58% · 2020 53% · 2021 55% · 2022 32% · 2023 38% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

58% of REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

90% of REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.3M that is directly attributable, 80% of it comes from California funders.

MT
IL
NV
CA
MD
DE
NM
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $11M arriving through sponsors registered in 10 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 449 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.

Operating margin53% · top quartile
Months of reserve0.9mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)19% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 449 housing & shelter nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Organizations like REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 4%Fundraising 10%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS?
REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS (California) receives grants from 39 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,817,078 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($9,440,681). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 90% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS have?
IRS filings report 39 organizations giving $12,817,078 in grants to REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS, 22 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $9,440,681 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like REDWOOD GOSPEL MISSIONS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Redwood Gospel Missions →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 39 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing