Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

THE ENERGY FOUNDATION

THE ENERGY FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 40 organizations whose IRS filings report $551,835,463 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($162,104,500). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$109M
Funders on record
40
Grants received
$552M
Net assets
$121M
24/40 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What The Energy Foundation does

Mission

The Energy Foundation's mission is to achieve greenhouse gas emissions neutrality, world-class air quality, energy access, and green growth through transforming energy and optimizing economic structure.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. In 2024, The Energy Foundation granted to organizations and institutions that help address climate change and accelerate the low carbon energy transition. Grants were made for education and analysis to find and support solutions in areas including clean energy vehicles, renewable energy, low carbon growth planning, sustainable cities, and energy efficiency. To support its grantmaking in china, The Energy Foundation's expenditures in 2024 included the salary and benefits of around 90 staff members, office rental, equipment costs, and other operational expenses related to maintaining the foundation's beijing representative office.

    $76,353,520 spentof which $58,494,832 as grants$45,652 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $76,353,520.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($110M) Expenses 100 ($114M) Net assets 100 ($62M)2018 Revenue 128 ($141M) Expenses 107 ($122M) Net assets 131 ($82M)2019 Revenue 114 ($126M) Expenses 108 ($123M) Net assets 138 ($86M)2020 Revenue 69 ($76M) Expenses 35 ($40M) Net assets 104 ($65M)2021 Revenue 75 ($83M) Expenses 49 ($56M) Net assets 148 ($92M)2022 Revenue 53 ($58M) Expenses 61 ($69M) Net assets 131 ($82M)2023 Revenue 77 ($84M) Expenses 68 ($77M) Net assets 146 ($91M)2024 Revenue 99 ($109M) Expenses 73 ($83M) Net assets 194 ($121M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (99)Expenses (73)Net assets (194)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $76M to $108M (+43%).

$76M
$95M
$102M
$76M
$108M
$102M
$110M
$142M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$3.9M
’17
$19M
’18
$2.7M
’19
$36M
’20
$27M
’21
−$12M
’22
$7.1M
’23
$26M
’24
20
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Zou Ji

CEO

Board chair

Hongjun Zhang

Board chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2222321417191920
Joined·+3+13+4+3+2+1+1
No longer listed·33220010
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 16 funders to 13 funders, grant income fell $73M → $65M.

8 of 40 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $1.8M from 7 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Jewish Communal Fund). These are real filings, and they are not money THE ENERGY FOUNDATION raised.

From the IRS filings of THE ENERGY FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 40 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE ENERGY FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 29% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

42% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE ENERGY FOUNDATION.

29%
largest funder
57%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 54% · 2018 47% · 2019 40% · 2020 19% · 2021 34% · 2022 31% · 2023 42% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

32% of THE ENERGY FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

86% of THE ENERGY FOUNDATION's grant income comes from California funders.

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
MD
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $105M arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like THE ENERGY FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 6%Fundraising 2%

Governance

12
board members
92%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

64%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 16 states

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE ENERGY FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE ENERGY FOUNDATION?
THE ENERGY FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 40 organizations whose IRS filings report $551,835,463 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($162,104,500). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE ENERGY FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 40 organizations giving $551,835,463 in grants to THE ENERGY FOUNDATION, 24 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE ENERGY FOUNDATION?
THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $162,104,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE ENERGY FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 40 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing