Skip to content

Illinois · Nonprofit

PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA

PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA (Illinois) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,090,711 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($4,951,929). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$3.2M
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$5.1M
Net assets
$573k
1/9 repeat funders
01What it does

What Prytula Foundation USA does

Mission

The corporation provides humanitarian aid to people affected by war or disaster resulting from the war in ukraine.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Logistics and special transport projectthe organization implemented the logistics and special transport project to support the delivery of humanitarian aid and essential services to civilians in conflict-affected regions of ukraine. All program activities were exclusively charitable in nature and did not support military or combat operations.program activities included the procurement and distribution of vehicles used solely for humanitarian purposes, including the transport of medical supplies, delivery of essential goods, evacuation of civilians, and support of humanitarian personnel. The organization maintained strict controls to ensure that all vehicles were used exclusively for civilian and humanitarian functions, with explicit prohibitions on military or combat use.the organization collaborated with vetted local partners to identify priority needs and ensure that assistance was directed to vulnerable civilian populations, including residents of frontline and recently affected areas. All assets were tracked and monitored in accordance with internal control procedures to ensure proper charitable use.as a result of this program, beneficiary communities experienced improved…

    $2,277,756 spentof which $2,277,756 as grants
    63% of program spending
  2. Safe communities initiative projectthe organization implemented the safe communities initiative project to enhance the protection and safety of civilians in conflict-affected regions of ukraine. All program activities were exclusively charitable and focused on civilian protection, with no involvement in military or combat operations.program activities included the deployment of civilian early warning systems designed solely for public alerting and safety purposes, the reinforcement and improvement of shelters used by civilian populations, and the provision of communication tools and essential safety resources. These systems and resources were installed and distributed in residential areas, schools, and other civilian infrastructure to improve preparedness and reduce risks associated with aerial attacks and other threats impacting civilian populations.the organization worked with vetted local partners and community stakeholders to identify high-risk areas and ensure that assistance reached vulnerable civilian populations. All resources were distributed and monitored in accordance with internal controls to ensure their use exclusively for charitable and civilian protection…

    $532,362 spentof which $532,362 as grants
    15% of program spending
  3. Humanitarian demining projectthe organization implemented the humanitarian demining project to reduce risks to civilians and support recovery in conflict-affected and recently liberated regions of ukraine. All program activities were exclusively charitable and limited to humanitarian demining, with no support provided to military operations.program activities included the provision of specialized equipment and technical resources to certified humanitarian demining partners. This support included remote-operated clearance machinery, detection and marking tools, and aerial assessment technologies used to identify and remove explosive hazards.the organization collaborated with vetted and certified partners to prioritize high-risk civilian areas, including agricultural land and community-access zones. All resources were provided and monitored in accordance with internal controls to ensure proper charitable use and compliance with applicable standards.as a result of this program, approximately 226.11 hectares of agricultural land were cleared of explosive hazards, contributing to safer access to land, reduced risk to civilian populations, and the restoration of economic activity in…

    $267,367 spentof which $267,367 as grants
    7% of program spending
  4. Reconstruction of school shelters projectthe ongoing war in ukraine has profoundly disrupted the education system, leaving many schools unable to provide safe spaces for children to learn. Currently, 68% of functioning ukrainian schools are equipped with temporary protective structures of various types, allowing them to begin at least hybrid or fully offline learning. However, a significant portion of these shelters fail to meet modern building standards for temporary protective structures, cannot accommodate all students, or lack the comfort needed for long-term use.reconstruction and equipping of these shelters are critical to ensuring education continues in a secure and supportive environment, even during wartime. These efforts protect students and teachers during air raids while creating adaptable learning spaces for hybrid and offline education amidst the challenges of conflict.the availability of a safe and well-equipped shelter in schools ensures the sustainability of the educational process during wartime: it enables the transition to offline or blended learning and allows for the organization of educational and recreational activities while staying in the shelter.

    $250,000 spentof which $250,000 as grants
    7% of program spending
  5. Crisis emergency response projectcrisis situations demand immediate and efficient responses to mitigate harm and restore stability. Infrastructure destruction, disrupted communications, and limited resources make it challenging for responders to deliver aid and support to affected populations. The crisis emergency response project addresses these challenges by equipping local teams and vulnerable communities with advanced tools tailored to the unique needs of each situation.we provide critical resources such as laptops, starlink satellite systems, and portable generators to maintain communication and power in remote or damaged areas. Drones enable aerial assessments of crisis zones, while durable vehicles facilitate aid delivery and civilian evacuations. Emergency shelters, medical kits, and water purification systems ensure basic needs are met, while small tools and repair kits support rapid infrastructure repairs.our project empowers responders to work smarter and faster, ensuring effective aid delivery and better outcomes for those affected. By providing innovative and practical solutions, we contribute to saving lives and rebuilding resilience.

    $168,136 spentof which $168,136 as grants
    5% of program spending
  6. Healthcare projectssince the beginning of russia's full-scale invasion of ukraine, 1,468 healthcare facilities have been damaged by shelling and active hostilities, with an additional 193 completely destroyed.to ensure access to quality healthcare in de-occupied and conflict-affected regions, operational medical facilities are being expanded and modernized, while medical communities are organizing mobile doctor visits. We contribute to these efforts by providing essential medical equipment, supplies, transportation, and other critical resources.our support plays a vital role in restoring and sustaining healthcare services in war-affected regions. By equipping healthcare providers with the tools they need, we help ensure timely medical assistance, enhance the mobility of care delivery, and support the resilience of communities facing the challenges of war.

    $129,124 spentof which $129,124 as grants
    4% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,624,745.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2024, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2024, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20242024 Revenue 100 ($3.5M) Expenses 100 ($2.4M) Net assets 100 ($1.1M)2025 Revenue 92 ($3.2M) Expenses 153 ($3.7M) Net assets 54 ($573k)
20242025
Revenue (92)Expenses (153)Net assets (54)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $1.1M to $677k (−37%).

$1.1M
$677k
20242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,679 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.1M
’24
−$485k
’25
2.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20242025
Listed33
Joined·+0
No longer listed·0
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

5 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 97% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA.

97%
largest funder
99%
top three
~1
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $19k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Illinois, across 3 states.

NY
NJ
DE

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $5.1M to it.

Operating margin−15% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−8% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 718 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 1%Fundraising 1%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA?
PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA (Illinois) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,090,711 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($4,951,929). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $5,090,711 in grants to PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $4,951,929 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PRYTULA FOUNDATION USA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2024–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing