How much did PWC FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

PWC FOUNDATION INC reported 521 grants totaling $36,268,758 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is PWC FOUNDATION INC based?

PWC FOUNDATION INC is based in NY.

PWC FOUNDATION INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

PWC FOUNDATION INC

Assistance to the people of pwc us group llp ("pwc"the firm") in times of financial hardship and to non-profit organizations that support, promote and invest in emerging solutions to society's greatest challenges in education and humanitarianism.

$36M

Granted FY2024

521

Grants

Communities

$6.0M

Largest

01What you fund

0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$38MHuman Services$14MEmployment$10MCivil Rights$7.4MYouth Development$7.3MInternational$5.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$5.0MCommunity Improvement$4.3MPhilanthropy$4.2MOther$38M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

ucsfnutritiondistributionsway greateraccess nutritiouspaleynationals

2021

humble isdtherapistsleveragingremoving barriersbiggest facingmanhattancombat

2022

renaissancetrellusyouth codecode jamtablehelps younghome-based

2023

holocaustjewseuropeeast bostonproductionscamp wightmanchelsea east

2024

scratchclose gaphbcucoffee bunkerperforming artssolarperformances

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 521 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k483 grants · $12M
$50k–250k28 grants · $2.0M
$250k+10 grants · $21M

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$77M

Total assets

Largest grants

JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC$6,000,000
MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW$3,000,000
MOBILIZEGREEN INC$2,025,000
CODEPATH ORG$2,000,000
FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES INC$2,000,000
ARIZOUPROJECT BASTA$2,000,000
TEAM RUBICON INC$1,900,000
AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS INC$1,000,000
GOOD360$760,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$300,000
NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR$150,000
THE KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION$150,000
CODE PLATOON$125,000
3DE NATIONAL LLC$125,000
DIRECT RELIEF$100,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $12.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$78M · 438 repeat orgs$56M to everyone else

438 repeat relationships — 307 still active in FY2024, 131 since wound down; 214 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

438

436

Total granted

$78M

$35M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%

+51%

Still filing today

97%

93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TR
Team Rubicon
4× · 2021–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +18%
3N
3DE National LLC
4× · 2021–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +28% · 42% of their budget
RI
Reading is Fundamental Inc
2× · 2020–2022 · $3.8M · revenue +15%

Funded once

The Trevor Projectgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $6.0M · revenue +459%
OM
ONE MILLION DEGREESgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $3.0M · revenue +99%
PT
PHI THETA KAPPA HONOR SOCIETYgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $3.0M · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education

The Nasdaq Entrepreneurial Center Inc

Deliver world-class resources and mentoring to enable every entrepreneur across the globe to realize their maximum potential.

Arts & Culture

The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education

College Summit Inc

Peerforward transforms the lives of low-income youth by connecting them to college and career.

Education

Youthlink

To support and empower young people on their journey to self-reliance.

Human Services

Abilities Network Inc

To cultivate inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.

Health

Educare Dc

To eliminate the opportunity gap with high-quality early learning for children prenatal to age 5.

Human Services

Global Fund for Children

To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.

Arts & Culture

Kipp Bay Area Schools

Kipp bay area schools prepares students with skills and confidence for their future.

Education

Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education

Silicon Schools Fund Inc

Support the launch of excellent new schools and innovative practices that improve education.

Education

Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roads to Success Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cathleen Stone Island Outward Bound. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.5%6/1,088

the rest of the field

11%

206,158/1,818,477

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

1042 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

280

Early backer (in before they grew)

1033/1042

Grantees still filing

858/1042

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$37,802,190Other$51,796,500Human Services$14,479,778Employment$10,417,500Civil Rights$7,415,000Youth Development$7,309,500International$5,027,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Girls IncNY47.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Girls Inc · Cla Foundation · The Sidley Austin Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · AT&T Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg · The Coca-Cola Foundation Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation · Deloitte Foundation · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PWC FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

20get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GREATER FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~64 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 273151846 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GREATER FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 64 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 79% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Pwc Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pwc Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

More from the funding graph

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

Strange bedfellows

the named clusters of US funding

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines