Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN (Michigan) is funded by 75 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $29,998,979 in grants to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($6,796,425). 42 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,322 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,322 health nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
$119k from 4 funders in 2025, up from $2.2M and 12 in 2017.
23 of 75 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 49% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 75 funders by total. Association, not causation.
COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 36% · 2018 33% · 2019 20% · 2020 32% · 2021 55% · 2022 53% · 2023 18% · 2024 18% · 2025 48% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
52% of COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN draws 76% of its grant income from funders outside Michigan — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 20 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 75 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
79% of spending goes to programs.
56%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Part of a family of 20 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 75funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing