Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Credit Suisse Americas Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.6M
Granted FY2023
144
Grants FY2023
16
States reached
$720k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Credit Suisse Americas Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Credit Suisse Americas Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 129 organizations, $6M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

259
’19
203
’20
62
’21
52
’22
129
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Education$7.1MPhilanthropy$3.4MInternational$3.1MEmployment$2.8MHuman Services$2.8MFood & Nutrition$2.6MYouth Development$2.0MHealth$1.6MOther$0
02FY2023 · 144 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k103 grants · $422k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $284k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.4M
$5,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIPP FOUNDATION$720,000
CAREERWISE NEW YORK$630,000
BRAVEN INC$458,414
OWNERSHIP WORKS$400,000
YEAR UP INC$362,055
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$316,751
CITY HARVEST INC$250,610
WAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$250,000
NEW YORK CARES$225,000
MYFUTURENC$180,000
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$150,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$136,648
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$114,000
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA$109,715
GOLF CANADA FOUNDATION USA INC$95,404
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BED-STUY CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $8k → 20%GOODWILL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 11%CANINES FOR SERVICE: $10k → 12%COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY: $14k → 11%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $10k → 9%HARRISONS HEROES: $15k → 16%CANINES FOR SERVICE INC: $8k → 12%KULANU ACADEMY: $10k → 6%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $10k → 7%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 10%LIFE'S WORC: $56k → 6%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $14k → 8%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $18k → 13%A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE: $10k → 20%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $8k → 13%KRAMDEN INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 11%PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $11k → 20%ANSWER THE CALL: $9k → 17%OUR PLACE IN NEW YORK INC: $10k → 20%TOBACCO ROAD MARATHON: $15k → 8%THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE TRIANGLE AREA: $15k → 8%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $363k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $150k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $150k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $150k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $150k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $22k → 17%LOWER EAST SIDE FAMILY UNION: $11k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $10k → 17%DRESS FOR SUCCESS TRIANGLE NC: $10k → 8%CHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC: $19k → 17%NOTE IN THE POCKET INC: $8k → 8%JEWISH UNION FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%ANURAAG FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ANURAAG FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10k → 17%ANURAAG FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%GOOD FOUNDATION: $104k → 17%GOOD FOUNDATION: $103k → 17%GOOD FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%GOOD FOUNDATION: $92k → 17%GOOD FOUNDATION: $90k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $119k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $103k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $75k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $75k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED: $20k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Credit Suisse Americas Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 47% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 51% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Credit Suisse Americas Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23M · 194 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

194 repeat relationships — 80 still active in FY2023, 114 since wound down; 58 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

194
232

Total granted

$23M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+30%

Still filing today

88%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    KIPP FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $2.5M · revenue +126%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +52%
  • BI
    BRAVEN INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • SG
    Skill Growth
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -76%
  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $184k · revenue -1%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE TORONTO
    one grant, 2022 · $90k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
3
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
4
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
5
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dare Devils. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Development CentersCommunity Arts CentersSchool Parent OrganizationsCommunity Food PantriesEquine Therapy ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Ymca Youth DevelopmentAffordable Housing Developm…Developmental Disabilities …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…School District FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesPublic Library OperationsYouth Mentoring ProgramsElementary Literacy TutoringLocal Food System Organizat…Local History MuseumsAddiction Recovery ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Christian Youth CampsChristian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and ShelterUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Policy Research and AdvocacySenior Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Military Veterans SupportFood Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.2%1/437
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,128

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

417 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 417 of the 490 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
95
Early backer (in before they grew)
414/417
Grantees still filing
308/417
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIPP FOUNDATION — $2,515,841 · EducationKIPP FOUNDATIONCAREERWISE NEW YORK INC — $990,959 · EducationCAREERWISE NEW YORK INCWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $750,000 · EducationWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE F…ACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC — $603,314 · EducationACHIEVEMENT FIRST INCYEAR UP INC — $562,055 · EducationYEAR UP INCUNCOMMON SCHOOLS INC — $523,490 · EducationUNCOMMON SCHOOLS INCHARLEM ACADEMY — $452,464 · EducationRELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION — $412,500 · EducationTeach for America Inc — $388,392 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $345,681 · Education+13 more — $1,207,736 · Education+13 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $2,491,945 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATI…NEW YORK CARES INC — $1,429,420 · PhilanthropyNEW YORK CARES INCNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $811,880 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC…ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $350,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATIONSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC — $275,852 · Philanthropy+5 more — $206,230 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient — $650,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC — $432,574 · OtherTHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE — $394,719 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARI…SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC — $335,579 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $291,076 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS - GREATER NEW YORK — $260,099 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $668,280 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERN…MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $563,361 · OtherMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERV…+106 more — $3,334,350 · Other+106 moreHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $985,154 · Human ServicesHENRY STR…GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC — $489,043 · Human ServicesGOOD PLUS…GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES — $371,745 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEP…+36 more — $635,017 · Human Services+36 moreCITY HARVEST INC — $1,586,794 · Food & NutritionCITY HARV…FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $682,968 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK…+3 more — $89,323 · Food & NutritionFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $586,648 · Community ImprovementOWNERSHIP WORKS INC — $500,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $46,836 · Community ImprovementBRAVEN INC — $1,065,368 · Youth Development+4 more — $59,506 · Youth Development
Education$8,752,432Philanthropy$5,565,327Other$6,930,038Human Services$2,480,959Food & Nutrition$2,359,085Community Improvement$1,133,484Youth Development$1,124,874

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKIPP FOUNDATION — $2,515,841 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $2,491,945 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $1,586,794 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC — $1,429,420 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetBRAVEN INC — $1,065,368 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCAREERWISE NEW YORK INC — $990,959 over 3y, 13% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $985,154 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $811,880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $750,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $682,968 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $668,280 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC — $603,314 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $586,648 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $563,361 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $562,055 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNCOMMON SCHOOLS INC — $523,490 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOWNERSHIP WORKS INC — $500,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC — $489,043 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHARLEM ACADEMY — $452,464 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetTHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC — $432,574 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetRELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION — $412,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE — $394,719 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $388,392 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES — $371,745 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $345,681 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC — $335,579 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $291,076 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMYFUTURENCINC — $280,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC — $275,852 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $245,855 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSkill Growth — $200,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $184,082 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY — $166,680 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $153,305 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBLUE ENGINE INC — $150,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $147,940 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC — $144,284 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $86,725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREP FOR PREP — $85,293 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC — $75,403 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $67,466 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE INC — $58,273 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLIFE'S WORC INC — $56,378 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INC — $54,253 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $53,055 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHIEF EXECUTIVES FOR CORPORATE PURPOSE INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson F…Triangle Community Fo…Robin Hood FoundationUnited Way of the Gre…Pinkerton FoundationCarolina Hurricanes F…Duke University Healt…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Aj Fletcher FoundationBrooklyn Community Fo…W Trent Ragland Jr Fo…The Leon Levine Found…
The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ60.4× affinity44 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Carolina Hurricanes Foundation · Duke University Health System Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Aj Fletcher Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Credit Suisse Americas Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Covenant House New Jersey Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Bayshore Center at Bivalve Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service & Children's Center of Clifton-Passaicinc — 19% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Services of Northern New Jersey Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Achievement First Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
73report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 490 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines