· Private foundation
Ally Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k146 grants · $2.8M
- $50k–250k24 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION | $400,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS | $400,000 |
| THE OTHER SIDE ACADEMY | $284,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE CHARLOTTE REGION INC | $250,000 |
| CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC | $114,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT | $107,000 |
| REBUILDING TOGETHER | $100,000 |
| INVEST DETROIT FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UGF INSTITUTE INC | $100,000 |
| EMERGING INDUSTRIES TRAINING INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION | $100,000 |
| THE OTHER SIDE ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| SUCCESS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
185 repeat relationships — 141 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $957k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +31%
- GMGIVE MERIT INC2× · 2020–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +212%
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION3× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +6%
Funded once
- LELATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -11%
- TMTMCF-Ally Moguls in the Makingone grant, 2021 · $115k
- FFFEARLESS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…
As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…
Our mission is to increase socioeconomic mobility by building pathways to thriving careers.
The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.
All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…
We provide training, coaching, community supports and access to leading colorado employers enabling coloradans to acheive economic security, mobility and prosperity.
Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…
We champion the potential of every person to succeed in a rewarding career, while working to create an equitable and inclusive workforce for tomorrow. we do this by providing skill development for in demand jobs, comprehensive supports,…
Charlotte works serves job-seekers and businesses by providing resources to develop a skilled workforce that meets employer needs. the organization offers job-search workshops, individual coaching, networking opportunities, and training…
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working in Support of Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is West Side Clt. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
250 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 250 of the 301 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds GIVE MERIT INC ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Habitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region ↗
- Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
- Who funds UGF Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds KEN GARFF FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds EMERGING INDUSTRIES TRAINING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE RELATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds Supportive Housing Communities Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
- Who funds LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds LAWN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds Friendship Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds CAUGHT UP ↗
- Who funds Journi Incorporated ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Carolinas ↗
- Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
- Who funds Young Womens Christian Association of the Central Carolinas Inc ↗
- Who funds FOR THE STRUGGLE INC ↗
- Who funds GardHouse Limited ↗
- Who funds West Side CLT ↗
- Who funds DETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE SOLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Urban League of Central Carolinas Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Merancas Foundation Inc · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Foundation for the Carolinas · Dte Energy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · The Presbyterian Hospital
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ally Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ally Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Ally Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.