How much did GIRLS INC grant in FY2025?

GIRLS INC reported 59 grants totaling $5,685,392 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

GIRLS INC

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

GIRLS INC

GIRLS INC.

$5.7M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$277k

Largest

01What you fund

0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Youth Development$22MHuman Services$3.2MCivil Rights$2.0MEducation$899kOther$15M

03FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k5 grants · $36k
$10k–50k18 grants · $331k
$50k–250k35 grants · $4.3M
$250k+1 grant · $277k

$63,747

Median grant

States reached

$88M

Total assets

Largest grants

GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS$276,555
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF LYNN$215,549
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY$214,155
GIRLS INC OF SHELBYVILLE & SHELBY CO$207,895
GIRLS INC OF ORANGE COUNTY$205,358
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$189,635
GIRLS INC OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA & SOUTHERN NJ$179,735
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER HOUSTON$156,486
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY$154,767
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO$152,781
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF TARRANT COUNTY$148,436
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ST LOUIS$148,095
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER ATLANTA$144,657
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF JACKSONVILLE$144,613
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SARASOTA COUNTY$143,008

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 43% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$42M · 75 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

75 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$42M

$211k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%

+78%

Still filing today

87%

71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GI
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY
8× · 2018–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +71%
GI
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF TARRANT COUNTY
8× · 2018–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +131%
GI
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA & SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY
8× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +164%

Funded once

GIRLS INCORPORATED OF THE SEACOASTgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $86k · revenue +78%
GI
GIRLS INC OF THE CENTRAL COAST
one grant, 2019 · $63k · revenue -3%
GI
GIRLS INC OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA
one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Girls Inc

Girls inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart, and bold through direct service and advocacy.

Youth Development

Gwens Girls Inc

To empower girls and young women to have productive lives through holistic gender specific programs, education, and experiences.

Youth Development

Girls Group

Girls group empowers middle and high school women to achieve emotional and economic security by graduating from high school and becoming first generation college graduates. girls group provides year round programming and mentoring to…

Youth Development

Girls in Stem

Human Services

Girls Place Inc

Empower girls to grow courageous, strong and self-sufficient. inspire girls to celebrate themselves-their minds, their hearts, and their physical well-being.

Youth Development

I Am a Girl

International

Girls in Tech Inc

Girls in tech (git) is a global non-profit focused on the engagement, education and empowerment of girls and women who are passionate about technology. our aim is to accelerate the growth of innovative women who are entering into the…

—

Girls in Gear Inc

We think bikes are an extraordinary tool for change in ourselves and our communities. By teaching girls new skills on their bikes, we equip our riders with life-long lessons off their bikes

Recreation & Sports

Girls Build

Girls build inspires curiosity and confidence in girls through the world of building, including summer camps and after-school programs.

Youth Development

Female Strong

We want all girls to realize they can lead, they are smart and they can pursue their deam job.

Community Improvement

My Girls

Dedicated to empowering young girls through recreation to physical, mental, social, and emotional well-being in tandem with mentorship, equipping them with the skills and qualities required to thrive in the future by infusing the core…

—

Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. is a non-profit organization founded in Brooklyn, NY. DGI is dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of our communities, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM (Science, Technology,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is The Young Women's Christian. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/82

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,483

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

71 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

70/71

Grantees still filing

53/71

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Youth Development$21,687,883Other$14,776,229Human Services$3,176,792Civil Rights$1,951,276Education$898,728

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pwc Foundation IncNY47.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pwc Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Panera Bread Foundation Inc · New York Life Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · The Gap Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Simple Generosity Foundation · DPR Foundation · American Association of University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GIRLS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOS ANGELES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~15 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 811777303 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOS ANGELES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 15 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 67% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Girls Inc?

Find your warmest path to Girls Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GIRLS INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

71 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Girls Inc?

More from the funding graph

GIRLS INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

71 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Girls Inc?

More from the funding graph