· Community foundation
California Community Foundation
We invest in, partner with, and amplify the community to build a good life.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2,173 grants below total $326,106,215 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $336,983,147 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,876,932 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k157 grants · $1.1M
- $10k–50k927 grants · $19M
- $50k–250k814 grants · $86M
- $250k+275 grants · $221M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION | $8,050,000 |
| TRINITY WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $7,500,000 |
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | $6,377,050 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND | $5,836,057 |
| SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND | $5,669,606 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $5,010,500 |
| MILLION VOTERS PROJECT ACTION FUND | $4,700,000 |
| SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION | $4,195,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES | $3,250,000 |
| HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY & ART GALLERY | $3,117,150 |
| UCLA FOUNDATION | $2,973,737 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS | $2,757,013 |
| FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC | $2,657,000 |
| BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $2,500,000 |
| BRILLIANT CORNERS | $2,500,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $115.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
1660 repeat relationships — 1065 still active in FY2025, 595 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSkystone Foundation Inc5× · 2018–2022 · $51M · revenue +722% · 84% of their budget
REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2023 · $30M · revenue +15% · 64% of their budget- TCTRINITY COLLEGE5× · 2018–2025 · $27M · revenue +77%
Funded once
- NLNATIVE LAND CONSERVANCY INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5.0M · revenue +66%
- PUPRATHAM USAone grant, 2017 · $4.0M · revenue +20%
- RIRECIDIVIZ INCone grant, 2022 · $3.5M · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.
California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…
To educate students of diverse backgrounds in areas of fine arts, architecture, design, & writing.
The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…
Women's foundation of california amplifies the voices and experiences of community leaders, redistributes knowledge, power, and resources, and mobilizes communities and funders to advance justice for all.
to work alongside communities to build power, challenge systems of injustice, protect health, and improve quality of life.
the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.
The California Water Data Consortium is an independent, nonprofit organization created by a partnership of state agencies and others to ensure that Californians have access to the best possible water and ecological information to make…
To represent county government before the california legislature, administrative agencies and support county government.
Chamber's vision: a thriving region for all
Cda is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Works and the most unlike its peers is Autry Museum of the American West. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1819 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1819 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE SCHOOL OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds Skystone Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART USA INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Horizons ↗
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
- Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds ROLLING HILLS PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CHANCELLOR MASTERS & SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LEONARDO DICAPRIO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · United Way Inc · S Mark Taper Foundation · Durfee Foundation · Perenchio Foundation · The Green Foundation · Snap Foundation · Unihealth Foundation · Ccf Community Initiatives Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization California Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.