Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION

LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION (California) receives grants from 57 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,852,177 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($5,216,000). 39 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$8.1M
Revenue FY2025
57
Funders on record
$12M
Grants received
$14M
Net assets
39/57 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 18%

Against its field

LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION's revenue grew 48% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−9% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.8mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,883 arts & culture nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($5.5M) Expenses 100 ($5.6M) Net assets 100 ($3.7M)2018 Revenue 119 ($6.6M) Expenses 111 ($6.2M) Net assets 111 ($4.1M)2019 Revenue 141 ($7.8M) Expenses 137 ($7.7M) Net assets 112 ($4.2M)2020 Revenue 112 ($6.2M) Expenses 111 ($6.2M) Net assets 112 ($4.2M)2021 Revenue 97 ($5.3M) Expenses 66 ($3.7M) Net assets 173 ($6.5M)2022 Revenue 133 ($7.3M) Expenses 116 ($6.5M) Net assets 182 ($6.8M)2023 Revenue 213 ($12M) Expenses 145 ($8.2M) Net assets 281 ($10M)2024 Revenue 228 ($13M) Expenses 164 ($9.2M) Net assets 380 ($14M)2025 Revenue 148 ($8.1M) Expenses 157 ($8.8M) Net assets 371 ($14M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (148)Expenses (157)Net assets (371)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 4% · 2018 2% · 2019 2% · 2020 12% · 2021 21% · 2022 18% · 2023 3% · 2024 2% · 2025 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

63% of LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 5,374 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$117k
17
$342k
18
$67k
19
$27k
20
$1.6M
21
$773k
22
$3.6M
23
$3.3M
24
$696k
25
0.8
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 14 funders to 27 funders, grant income rose $544k → $2.1M.

10 of 57 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)51% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $8.4M from 6 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest California Community Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION raised.

From the IRS filings of LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 57 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 44% of grant income and the top three 71%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

53% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION.

44%
largest funder
71%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 41% · 2018 47% · 2019 59% · 2020 21% · 2021 40% · 2022 69% · 2023 49%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

53% of LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 68% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

51% of LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $5.8M that is directly attributable, 82% of it comes from California funders.

NY
NV
PA
CA
MD
DE
NC
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $6.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 57 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $425k on record.

Federal$425k
grants $425kcontracts $0
18
20
21
23
24
26
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$425k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

73% of spending goes to programs.

Program 73%Management 14%Fundraising 13%

Governance

25
board members
92%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION?
LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION (California) receives grants from 57 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,852,177 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($5,216,000). 39 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION have?
IRS filings report 57 organizations giving $11,852,177 in grants to LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION, 39 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $5,216,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 57funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing