· Private foundation
Snap Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k52 grants · $4.8M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS | $250,000 |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS | $250,000 |
| INNER-CITY ARTS | $250,000 |
| HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC | $250,000 |
| P S ARTS | $150,000 |
| LA PLAZA DE CULTURA Y ARTES | $150,000 |
| GHETTO FILM SCHOOL LA INC | $150,000 |
| CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES | $150,000 |
| ETM-LA INC | $150,000 |
| LATINO THEATER COMPANY | $150,000 |
| ARTS FOR L A | $125,000 |
| ARTS FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE NETWORK | $125,000 |
| YOUNG STORYTELLERS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ARMORY CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $100,000 |
| GET LIT WORDS IGNITE INC | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Snap Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC2× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +51%
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +301%- DCDESTINATION CRENSHAW4× · 2020–2024 · $650k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- SPSTREET POETS INCone grant, 2021 · $1.2M · revenue +21% · 75% of their budget
- RNRESTORE NEIGHBORHOODS LA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +456%
- AGACTOR'S GANG INCone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As creative producers, we are devoted to the production and presentation of groundbreaking experiences in contemporary performance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. As a service…
Youth in Arts builds visual and performing arts skills through innovative and in-depth programs that foster confidence, compassion and resilience in students of all abilities. We develop capacity among educators and teaching artists,…
To prepare students for leadership in the arts and business; where creativity, academic knowledge and financial literacy are essential for success. we are providing an education that integrates the four lenses of learning: academics, arts,…
Promoting culturals arts in los angeles including education, gallery exhibits, artist living and work spaces theater, art and community festivals, artistic development and community outreach.
To provide space for artists to work and to engage community through arts education, exhibitions of contemporary art, and cultural events.
MACLA/Movimiento de Arte y Cultura Latino Americana is an inclusive contemporary arts space grounded in the Chicano/Latino experience that incubates new visual, literary and performance art in order to engage people in civic dialogue and…
The orchestra pursues its mission, "to enrich and connect our community through intimate and transformative musical experiences which exemplify and foster artistic excellence, education and innovation," through the blend of traditional…
Contra-tiempo is a bold, multilingual los angeles-based activist dance theater company creating physically intense and politically astute performance work that moves audience to imagine what is possible. We create a new physical, visual…
Contemporary Art Review Los Angeles (Carla) is a Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization and publishing platform that is dedicated to providing inclusive perspectives on contemporary art. Publishing in both print and online, Carla is an…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arts for La and the most unlike its peers is Barcid Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MISSION ASSET FUND ↗
- Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds STREET POETS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds DESTINATION CRENSHAW ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds SELF HELP GRAPHICS & ART INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds READY TO SUCCEED ↗
- Who funds LATINO THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds REDISCOVER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds The Alliance For Media Arts Culture Inc ↗
- Who funds Arts for LA ↗
- Who funds RESTORE NEIGHBORHOODS LA INC ↗
- Who funds COOP Careers Inc ↗
- Who funds ACTOR'S GANG INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds VENICE ARTS ↗
- Who funds GET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds KCRW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MANIFESTWORKS ↗
- Who funds ARMORY CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE H E ART PROJECT dba ARTWORXLA ↗
- Who funds HOMEBOY ART ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG STORYTELLERS ↗
- Who funds TIA CHUCHA'S CENTRO CULTURAL INC ↗
- Who funds DIY GIRLS ↗
- Who funds BARCID FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PF Bresee Foundation ↗
- Who funds 826LA ↗
- Who funds BLACK OWNED AND OPERATED COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds KOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds A Noise Within ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Perenchio Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · The Rose Hills Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Ccf Community Initiatives Fund · The Green Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Snap Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Girls Make Beats Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Snap Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Snap Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.