Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

California · Nonprofit

GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (California) receives grants from 151 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,362,802 to it, the largest being Fritz B Burns Foundation a Nevada nonprofit corporation ($4,350,000). 99 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$21M
Revenue FY2025
151
Funders on record
$16M
Grants received
$54M
Net assets
99/151 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 16%

Against its field

GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 95 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−11% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve7.3mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 95 animals nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($21M) Expenses 100 ($16M) Net assets 100 ($31M)2018 Revenue 81 ($17M) Expenses 94 ($15M) Net assets 109 ($34M)2019 Revenue 117 ($24M) Expenses 133 ($21M) Net assets 122 ($38M)2020 Revenue 87 ($18M) Expenses 122 ($19M) Net assets 117 ($37M)2021 Revenue 55 ($11M) Expenses 66 ($10M) Net assets 132 ($41M)2022 Revenue 98 ($20M) Expenses 93 ($15M) Net assets 134 ($42M)2023 Revenue 129 ($27M) Expenses 137 ($21M) Net assets 158 ($49M)2024 Revenue 110 ($23M) Expenses 141 ($22M) Net assets 170 ($53M)2025 Revenue 103 ($21M) Expenses 151 ($24M) Net assets 173 ($54M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (103)Expenses (151)Net assets (173)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 10% · 2025 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

62% of GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (67% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 234 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$5.1M
17
$2.1M
18
$3.4M
19
$1.2M
20
$1.0M
21
$5.8M
22
$5.4M
23
$816k
24
$2.3M
25
7.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 35 funders to 76 funders, grant income fell $2.5M → $1.8M.

18 of 151 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)21% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 151 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

27%
largest funder
43%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 67% · 2018 16% · 2019 70% · 2020 14% · 2021 20% · 2022 15% · 2023 13%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

47% of GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 66% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

93% of GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION's grant income comes from California funders.

WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
SC
DC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.4M arriving through sponsors registered in 12 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 151 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $164k on record.

Federal$164k
grants $164kcontracts $0
17
19
21
Top agencies
  • Institute of Museum and Library Services$99k
  • Department of the Interior$65k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

75% of spending goes to programs.

Program 75%Management 21%Fundraising 4%

Governance

30
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

68%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION?
GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (California) receives grants from 151 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,362,802 to it, the largest being Fritz B Burns Foundation a Nevada nonprofit corporation ($4,350,000). 99 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION have?
IRS filings report 151 organizations giving $16,362,802 in grants to GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 99 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION?
Fritz B Burns Foundation a Nevada nonprofit corporation is the largest funder on record, with $4,350,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 151funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing