Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN

US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,491,984 to it, the largest being THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ($607,724). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2023
$578k
Funders on record
28
Grants received
$2.5M
Net assets
$0
10/28 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 45%
01What it does

What US National Committee for Un Women does

Mission

Support the work of un women through education, advocacy, and fundraising.

As stated on its FY2023 Form 990.

Program

  1. Provide support to chapters throughout the united states by providing informational materials, a website, meetings and conferences.

    $972,279 spentof which $739,913 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2023 Form 990. Program spending in total: $972,279.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.6M) Expenses 100 ($1.8M) Net assets 100 ($4.0M)2018 Revenue 66 ($1.1M) Expenses 154 ($2.8M) Net assets 57 ($2.3M)2019 Revenue 150 ($2.4M) Expenses 193 ($3.5M) Net assets 31 ($1.2M)2020 Revenue 93 ($1.5M) Expenses 79 ($1.4M) Net assets 9 ($356k)2021 Revenue 79 ($1.3M) Expenses 65 ($1.2M) Net assets 12 ($465k)2022 Revenue 159 ($2.5M) Expenses 117 ($2.1M) Net assets 23 ($909k)2023 Revenue 36 ($578k) Expenses 61 ($1.1M) Net assets 0 ($0)
2017201820192020202120222023
Revenue (36)Expenses (61)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $4.0M to $2.3M (−42%).

$4.0M
$2.3M
$2.0M
$770k
$702k
$941k
$0
2017201820192020202120222023
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 2% · 2021 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

−$189k
’17
−$1.7M
’18
−$1.1M
’19
$77k
’20
$109k
’21
$444k
’22
−$509k
’23
1.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Susan Cutri

Executive director

As listed on its FY2023 Form 990.

2017201820192020202120222023
Listed12101191085
Joined·+1+2+3+1+2+0
No longer listed·315043
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $97k → $259k.

13 of 28 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 67% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 24% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

77% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN.

24%
largest funder
67%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 51% · 2018 52% · 2019 48% · 2020 40% · 2021 57% · 2022 43% · 2023 78% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

19% of US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 36% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

67% of US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $834k that is directly attributable, 85% of it comes from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 11 states.

WA
IL
NY
SD
IN
OH
NJ
CA
NC
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.7M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 7%Fundraising 4%

Governance

2
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

63%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 32 states

AK
ME
NH
WA
ND
MN
MI
NY
OR
NV
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
MD
NM
KS
AR
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN?
US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,491,984 to it, the largest being THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ($607,724). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN have?
IRS filings report 28 organizations giving $2,491,984 in grants to US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN?
THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND is the largest funder on record, with $607,724 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 28 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing