Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

OUTFEST

OUTFEST (California) receives grants from 38 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,614,844 to it, the largest being CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,261,500). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$864k
Funders on record
38
Grants received
$2.6M
Net assets
$128k
17/38 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%
01What it does

What Outfest does

Mission

Outfest is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to protect our past, showcase our present and nurture our future by fostering artistic expression of gender, sexuality and lgbt culture and its transformative social impact on the world.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. General programs - Outfest produced a four-day screening series in two los angeles locations serving approx. 10,000 people. The series exhibited feature-length and short films reflecting the experience of the lgbtq+ community. The series brought together members of the lgbtq+ community from across los angeles to celebrate and affirm their experience while supporting new and emerging filmmakers. Additionally, Outfest hosted multiple one-night community screenings of lgbtq+ films.

    $189,312 spent$69,821 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $189,312.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.0M) Expenses 100 ($3.0M) Net assets 100 ($252k)2018 Revenue 102 ($3.1M) Expenses 104 ($3.1M) Net assets 81 ($204k)2019 Revenue 96 ($2.9M) Expenses 103 ($3.1M) Net assets 0 ($444)2020 Revenue 82 ($2.5M) Expenses 83 ($2.5M) Net assets -14 ($-34695)2021 Revenue 130 ($3.9M) Expenses 122 ($3.7M) Net assets 84 ($211k)2022 Revenue 127 ($3.8M) Expenses 126 ($3.8M) Net assets 91 ($229k)2023 Revenue 95 ($2.9M) Expenses 115 ($3.5M) Net assets -144 ($-363032)2024 Revenue 29 ($864k) Expenses 15 ($444k) Net assets 51 ($128k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (29)Expenses (15)Net assets (51)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $591k to $93k (−84%).

$373k
$330k
$260k
$279k
$415k
$591k
$93k
$227k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 3% · 2019 2% · 2020 14% · 2021 7% · 2022 4% · 2023 4% · 2024 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$3k
’17
−$48k
’18
−$203k
’19
−$20k
’20
$246k
’21
$28k
’22
−$603k
’23
$420k
’24
6.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Christopher Racster

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2425252526282613
Joined·+1+5+11+2+12+7+2
No longer listed·0511110915
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 14 funders, grant income rose $148k → $278k.

11 of 38 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 56% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of OUTFEST’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 38 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

OUTFEST leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 63%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

73% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund OUTFEST.

48%
largest funder
63%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 24% · 2018 31% · 2019 35% · 2020 18% · 2021 80% · 2022 66% · 2023 36% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of OUTFEST's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 45% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

56% of OUTFEST's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.2M that is directly attributable, 71% of it comes from California funders.

NY
PA
CA
UT
CO
MD
DE
NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.5M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding OUTFEST receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $20k on record.

Federal$20k
grants $20kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$20k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like OUTFEST

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

34% of spending goes to programs.

Program 34%Management 53%Fundraising 12%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

63%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for OUTFEST: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds OUTFEST?
OUTFEST (California) receives grants from 38 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,614,844 to it, the largest being CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,261,500). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does OUTFEST have?
IRS filings report 38 organizations giving $2,614,844 in grants to OUTFEST, 17 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of OUTFEST?
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,261,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like OUTFEST find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Outfest →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 38 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing