Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

INNERCITY VISIONS

INNERCITY VISIONS (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,413,915 to it, the largest being NARROW GATE FOUNDATION ($1,173,953). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.8M
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$2.4M
Net assets
$-39126
5/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 96%
01What it does

What Innercity Visions does

Mission

The organization is dedicated to providing gang intervention, immediate crisis care, prevention and empowerment to children and families who are most vulnerable to human trafficking and exploitation.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Historical data includes: Over 480 referrals and linkages provided for mental health and employment needs. 186 families and 11 children rescued from exploitation and empowered through crisis program. 11 families prevented from county protective services involvement (DCFS). 9 girls (ages 6-12) enrolled in prevention program: all have high risk factors for sexual exploitation. 92% program retention rate for 1st year human trafficking prevention participants. 95% program retention rate for 2nd year participants. 90% placement rate for summer jobs. 100% job assignment completion. 28 human trafficking victims rescued. Please note: the organization has one cohesive mission and does not dilineate revenues and expenditures for the different areas / programs that support the overall mission.

    $1,885,180 spent$1,847,047 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. included in first program

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  3. Included in first program

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,885,180.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($500k) Expenses 100 ($492k) Net assets 100 ($28k)2018 Revenue 92 ($459k) Expenses 92 ($452k) Net assets 126 ($36k)2019 Revenue 103 ($515k) Expenses 100 ($492k) Net assets 209 ($59k)2020 Revenue 102 ($509k) Expenses 95 ($468k) Net assets 352 ($100k)2021 Revenue 101 ($507k) Expenses 99 ($486k) Net assets 426 ($121k)2022 Revenue 144 ($718k) Expenses 146 ($720k) Net assets 418 ($118k)2023 Revenue 149 ($747k) Expenses 156 ($766k) Net assets 349 ($99k)2024 Revenue 370 ($1.8M) Expenses 403 ($2.0M) Net assets -138 ($-39126)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (370)Expenses (403)Net assets (-138)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $234k to $125k (−47%).

$35k
$92k
$104k
$186k
$234k
$125k
$104k
$70k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 0% · 2023 80% · 2024 64%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

95% of INNERCITY VISIONS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$8k
’17
$7k
’18
$23k
’19
$41k
’20
$21k
’21
−$2k
’22
−$19k
’23
−$138k
’24
0.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Alfred Lomas

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed11111448
Joined······+0+6
No longer listed······02
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income fell $479k → $88k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
$1.2M
funders
1
1
1
4
2
5
3
3
1

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 42% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INNERCITY VISIONS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 6 of 7 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INNERCITY VISIONS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INNERCITY VISIONS.

49%
largest funder
92%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 84% · 2021 93% · 2022 50% · 2023 77% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

INNERCITY VISIONS draws 84% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 3 states in all.

NV
CA
TN

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INNERCITY VISIONS has grown faster than three-quarters of the 11,263 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−7% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)21% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,263 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like INNERCITY VISIONS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

95% of spending goes to programs.

Program 95%Management 5%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
0%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INNERCITY VISIONS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INNERCITY VISIONS?
INNERCITY VISIONS (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,413,915 to it, the largest being NARROW GATE FOUNDATION ($1,173,953). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INNERCITY VISIONS have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $2,413,915 in grants to INNERCITY VISIONS, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INNERCITY VISIONS?
NARROW GATE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,173,953 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INNERCITY VISIONS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Innercity Visions →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing