· Private foundation
The Ahmanson Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $107k
- $10k–50k117 grants · $2.5M
- $50k–250k264 grants · $24M
- $250k+36 grants · $39M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROMAN ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELES | $6,300,000 |
| LOS ANGELES CTY MUS OF NAT HIST | $5,000,000 |
| THE COLBURN SCHOOL | $5,000,000 |
| MEXICAN AMER LEG DEF & EDU FD | $2,000,000 |
| CHILDRENS INSTITUTE INC | $1,500,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC | $1,500,000 |
| DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF LA | $1,500,000 |
| HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIB & ART GAL | $1,000,000 |
| PASADENA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION LTD | $1,000,000 |
| CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY | $1,000,000 |
| HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIB & ART GAL | $1,000,000 |
| PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS | $1,000,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $880,000 |
| VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES | $750,000 |
| LEGAL AID FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES | $750,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $37.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
427 repeat relationships — 251 still active in FY2024, 176 since wound down; 99 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HEHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY2× · 2020–2021 · $12M · revenue +89%
- URUNION RESCUE MISSION3× · 2020–2023 · $11M · revenue +67%
- TCTHE COLBURN SCHOOL5× · 2020–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +58%
Funded once
- CSCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $7.5M · revenue -70%
- TSTHE SHAKESPEARE CENTER OF LA INCone grant, 2023 · $3.3M
- JAJOSLYN ART MUSEUMone grant, 2021 · $3.0M · revenue -52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…
Wns is committed to creating a deeply caring community of lifelong learners that nurtures students from diverse backgrounds to reach their full potential, develop cultural competency, and inspire the world with their curiosity, innovation,…
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…
The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.
The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young & Healthy and the most unlike its peers is The Altadena Mountain Rescue Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
745 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 745 of the 906 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY ↗
- Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COLBURN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd ↗
- Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE ↗
- Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
- Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN ↗
- Who funds PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Green Foundation · Weingart Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · United Way Inc · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · QueensCare
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ahmanson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Ahmanson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Ahmanson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.