Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

YWCA of San Gabriel Valley

YWCA of San Gabriel Valley (California) receives grants from 37 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,450,332 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($3,009,025). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 72% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$12M
Funders on record
37
Grants received
$5.5M
Net assets
$4.2M
22/37 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 19%
01What it does

What YWCA of San Gabriel Valley does

Mission

The YWCA San Gabriel Valley is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Case Management Services are available to both our Senior Services and Domestic Violence clients. For homebound seniors through our Telephone Reassurance process, calls were provided to 7,284 clients which included emotional support check-in calls to combat loneliness, promote a sense of security, and improve clients mental wellbeing. For survivors of domestic violence enrolled in both our residential and non-residential program, 478 participants received advocacy, counseling, homemaking and personal care support, assistance with securing medical equipment, Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Medi-Cal health benefits, or CalFresh food assistance support, subsidized housing support (based on availability), transportation, and utility payment assistance.See Schedule O for more detail.

    $9,250,000 spent
    74% of program spending
  2. YWCA San Gabriel Valleys WINGS Domestic Violence and Prevention Services Programprovides services to domestic violence survivors and their children. Servicesinclude: emergency shelter, emergency food and clothing, case management, legaladvocacy, housing placement, outreach and education, and individual and groupcounseling. More than 2,000 clients were served with the goal of empowering,educating and supporting individuals to build a future free from violence. Theemergency shelter program is the second largest residential domestic violencefacility in Los Angeles County and promotes inclusivity, accepting all survivors ofdomestic violence, including men and members of the LGBTQ+ community.See Schedule O for further details.

    $2,100,000 spent
    17% of program spending
  3. Youth Program Serving young adults between the ages of 14-26, the program offers free specialized and age-appropriate supportive case management for the purpose of assisting with employment, education, life skills goals, and how to be peer social justice advocate. During the reporting period funding was secured to provide a mix of evidence-based, emerging, and promising practices promoting positive youth development, youth leadership and organizing efforts around anti-violence and peace promotion. The goal was to empower growth, provide mental health workshops, trauma-informed care webinars, financial literacy education, 40- Hour DV Advocacy Training, Mental Health First Aid Training, Pathways to Empowerment Program, and QPR Suicide Prevention Training. There were 329 individuals who participated in the Youth Services Program with 109 falling between the ages of 17 years and younger, 34 between the ages of 18-29 and 23 who declined to report their age. A second accomplishment during the year was a partnership with IGT Global, a gaming company which provided software, hardware and furnishing for a state of the art computer lab. Working with volunteer IT professionals and software…

    $650,000 spent
    5% of program spending
  4. The Racial and Social Justice Program - The YWCA San Gabriel Valley (YWCA-SGV) has continued the mission to eliminate racism through internal and external efforts centered on racial and social justice (RSJ), equity, social change, and systems change. Internally, this initiative has produced nine (9) RSJ staff sessions, where staff members engaged with information on social determinants of health, empathy, compassion, and ways to interject this content into service delivery. There was also an all-staff training, with two national trainers facilitating a full-day training entitled Reshaping our Social Conditioning in Community. Both the RSJ staff sessions and all-staff training had 80% participation from the approximate 100 staff members. See Schedule O for further details.

    $375,000 spent
    3% of program spending
  5. We Empowerment Center is a dynamic community resource hub, providing an array of services and resources in multiple languages (i.e., English, Spanish, and Mandarin) and to various age groups, including youths, teens, adults, and seniors. The program offered skills and workforce development services along wot community events, health education and wellness activities while celebrating cultural diversity. Approximately 1,540 individual participated in various events which included an Hispanic Heritage event in September 2023 that hosted 295 attendees and 15 community partners. Another examples was a Multicultural Fair in May 2024 where 440 people attended along with 28 vendors. The goal of the WE Empowerment Center is to empower individuals and ignite a positive transformation within our community.

    $150,094 spent
    1% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $12,525,094.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($7.9M) Expenses 100 ($7.9M) Net assets 100 ($1.1M)2018 Revenue 92 ($7.2M) Expenses 88 ($7.0M) Net assets 132 ($1.4M)2019 Revenue 74 ($5.9M) Expenses 85 ($6.7M) Net assets 45 ($472k)2020 Revenue 92 ($7.2M) Expenses 90 ($7.1M) Net assets 58 ($611k)2021 Revenue 209 ($16M) Expenses 163 ($13M) Net assets 391 ($4.1M)2022 Revenue 180 ($14M) Expenses 167 ($13M) Net assets 476 ($5.0M)2023 Revenue 199 ($16M) Expenses 194 ($15M) Net assets 507 ($5.3M)2024 Revenue 145 ($11M) Expenses 157 ($12M) Net assets 426 ($4.5M)2025 Revenue 159 ($12M) Expenses 158 ($13M) Net assets 399 ($4.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (159)Expenses (158)Net assets (399)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $7.7M to $12M (+53%).

$2.7M
$3.0M
$2.3M
$3.7M
$7.7M
$12M
$12M
$11M
$11M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 75% · 2018 76% · 2019 86% · 2020 90% · 2021 76% · 2022 93% · 2023 93% · 2024 89% · 2025 88%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$44k
’17
$256k
’18
−$844k
’19
$137k
’20
$3.5M
’21
$914k
’22
$343k
’23
−$1.0M
’24
−$45k
’25
1.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Debra Ward

CEO

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed111314121413131515
Joined·+2+3+0+4+0+0+5+0
No longer listed·02221030
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 9 funders to 13 funders, grant income rose $109k → $226k.

7 of 37 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 72% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of YWCA of San Gabriel Valley’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 37 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

YWCA of San Gabriel Valley leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

90% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund YWCA of San Gabriel Valley.

55%
largest funder
73%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 43% · 2019 99% · 2020 60% · 2021 98% · 2022 30% · 2023 44% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

22% of YWCA of San Gabriel Valley's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

72% of YWCA of San Gabriel Valley's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.5M that is directly attributable, 94% of it comes from California funders.

IL
NV
PA
CA
VA
DE
NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.9M arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like YWCA of San Gabriel Valley

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for YWCA of San Gabriel Valley: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds YWCA of San Gabriel Valley?
YWCA of San Gabriel Valley (California) receives grants from 37 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,450,332 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($3,009,025). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 72% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does YWCA of San Gabriel Valley have?
IRS filings report 37 organizations giving $5,450,332 in grants to YWCA of San Gabriel Valley, 22 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of YWCA of San Gabriel Valley?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $3,009,025 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like YWCA of San Gabriel Valley find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds YWCA of San Gabriel Valley →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 37 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing