Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK

THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK (California) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,753,359 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT ($1,613,500). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$8.7M
Funders on record
22
Grants received
$5.8M
Net assets
$8.8M
11/22 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 14%
01What it does

What The Utility Reform Network does

Mission

The Utility Reform Network (TURN) is a California nonprofit public benefit corporation organized as a statewide consumer organization representing utility ratepayers in regulatory, legislative, and judicial proceedings before theCalifornia Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and in other forums, as well as providing a wide range of consumer services. Founded in 1973, TURN also handles complaints and grievances, conducts outreach to senior and low-income groups, provides educational information, community training and research, and acts as liaison between ratepayers and utility regulators.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Legal - turn's legal team represented consumers in important regulatoryproceedings impacting the rates and services received by california utilityconsumers. Turn continued to advocate for enhanced consumer rights and enhancedutility accountability. Key wins resulted in substantial savings in avoided ratehikes and in utility shareholder cost responsibility. Turn won new protections fordisaster victims and medical baseline customers, and demanded improvements in crucial phone networks.

    $4,753,271 spent$6,642,225 earned by the program
    72% of program spending
  2. Lobbying, organizing, and racial equity - turn held events and trainings that educate and empower advocates to help vulnerable consumers stay connected to essential utility services. Turn mobilized our members and supporters to speak out at california public utilities commission hearings and public meetings to demand fair rates, policies and practices, and universal access.

    $1,256,125 spent
    19% of program spending
  3. Communications - turn spoke out in the media on behalf of consumers impacted bywildfires, planned shutoffs and unreliable phone service. Turn's media strategy putpressure on decision makers to reject utility bailouts and profiteering and putconsumers first. Turn's message was amplified through our use of social media, andturn's members received important information and opportunities for activism throughour newsletter, website and mailings.

    $554,978 spent
    8% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $6,564,374.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($6.4M) Expenses 100 ($5.4M) Net assets 100 ($5.7M)2018 Revenue 70 ($4.5M) Expenses 113 ($6.1M) Net assets 73 ($4.2M)2019 Revenue 130 ($8.3M) Expenses 135 ($7.3M) Net assets 90 ($5.2M)2020 Revenue 120 ($7.6M) Expenses 115 ($6.2M) Net assets 114 ($6.5M)2021 Revenue 107 ($6.8M) Expenses 124 ($6.7M) Net assets 115 ($6.6M)2022 Revenue 157 ($10M) Expenses 142 ($7.7M) Net assets 151 ($8.7M)2023 Revenue 101 ($6.4M) Expenses 147 ($7.9M) Net assets 130 ($7.5M)2024 Revenue 139 ($8.8M) Expenses 166 ($9.0M) Net assets 132 ($7.6M)2025 Revenue 137 ($8.7M) Expenses 144 ($7.8M) Net assets 153 ($8.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (137)Expenses (144)Net assets (153)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $8.5M to $16M (+94%).

$7.4M
$6.4M
$8.0M
$8.6M
$8.5M
$16M
$16M
$17M
$16M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 6%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

23% of THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,090 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$960k
’17
−$1.6M
’18
$954k
’19
$1.4M
’20
$92k
’21
$2.3M
’22
−$1.5M
’23
−$124k
’24
$945k
’25
4.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Beverly Tucker

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed181818161616161615
Joined·+2+1+2+2+2+2+1+1
No longer listed·21422212
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $529k → $864k.

5 of 22 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 20% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 28% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

70% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK.

28%
largest funder
59%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 66% · 2018 77% · 2019 39% · 2020 48% · 2021 45% · 2022 26% · 2023 29% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

77% of THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
DE
AZ
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.2M arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 497 public benefit nonprofits its size.

Operating margin11% · above the median
Months of reserve4.7mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 497 public benefit nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 10%Fundraising 6%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

74%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK?
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK (California) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,753,359 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT ($1,613,500). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK have?
IRS filings report 22 organizations giving $5,753,359 in grants to THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK?
THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT is the largest funder on record, with $1,613,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 22 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing