· Private foundation
Unihealth Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $450k
- $50k–250k69 grants · $7.9M
- $250k+12 grants · $4.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER | $625,350 |
| PROJECT ANGEL FOOD | $460,000 |
| MLK COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| JWCH INSTITUTE | $350,000 |
| COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY | $325,000 |
| CASA COLINA HOSPITAL AND CENTERS FOR HEALTHCARE | $308,001 |
| HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES | $300,000 |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS | $300,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOS ANGELES | $300,000 |
| NATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS COUNCIL INC | $286,275 |
| ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER | $285,391 |
| KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF USC | $265,000 |
| ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER | $243,000 |
| UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE | $233,108 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $10.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
138 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2025, 84 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS6× · 2019–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +418%
JWCH INSTITUTE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +94%- SMST MARY MEDICAL CENTER4× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +12%
Funded once
- DHDIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $640k · revenue -67% · 35% of their budget
- DHDIGNITY HEALTHone grant, 2019 · $640k · revenue +17%
- ULUC LOS ANGELESone grant, 2022 · $560k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.
Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…
The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.
Eisner health is a quality-focused, federally qualified nonprofit community health center dedicated to improving the physical, social, and emotional well-being of people in the communities we serve, regardless of income.
La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.
To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…
Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.
Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Community Healthcare and the most unlike its peers is Pasadena Christian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
220 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 220 of the 288 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JWCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR HOMELESS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds VIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BET TZEDEK ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
- Who funds Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY'S UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA ↗
- Who funds CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd ↗
- Who funds SCAN GROUP ↗
- Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds Whittier College ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds POMONA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds PATH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Weingart Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Baby2baby · The California Endowment · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · S Mark Taper Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Unihealth Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Unihealth Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Unihealth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.