Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION

THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION (California) receives grants from 145 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,592,918 to it, the largest being BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC ($11,300,000). 73 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$23M
Funders on record
145
Grants received
$61M
Net assets
$38M
73/145 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 68%
01What it does

What The Anti-Recidivism Coalition does

Mission

The Anti-Recidivism Coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. To ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network, comprehensive reentry services and opportunities to advocate for policy change. Through grassroots policy advocacy, we are dedicated to transforming the criminal justice system so that it is more just and equitable.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Inside programming:arc launched the hope & redemption team (hart) in 2017, bringing formerly incarcerated people back inside to provide parole and reentry programming to their currently incarcerated community members. Originating in seven california prisons, hart has since expanded to 29 prisons, including women's facilities ciw, ccwf, and sacramento cctrp. Arc also offers inreach programming at california fire camps pine grove and growlersberg.

    $6,609,345 spentof which $370,079 as grants
    33% of program spending
  2. Residential:arc has a track record of providing effective transitional housing services for formerly incarcerated individuals, both adults and transitional-aged-youth. Transitional housing programs provide residents with on-site lifeskills programming, counseling, education and employment guidance, and live-in mentors to promote independent living and wellness among residents. By providing these services, arc works to reduce recidivism and improve reentry outcomes among formerly incarcerated individuals returning home to los angeles county.

    $4,991,004 spentof which $35,141 as grants
    25% of program spending
  3. Membership services:arc's member services program encompasses membership and membership events, arc's clinical & wellness services, tay services, women's programming, and ride home programming. The department consists of staff in the los angeles and sacramento offices working to support innovative and evidence based programs that integrate tenants of care, whole person care, increasing accesses to services, and reducing the divide between physical emotional and overall well being.

    $4,018,583 spentof which $218,510 as grants
    20% of program spending
  4. Workforce and education:our key vocational training initiative is our los angeles second chance apprenticeship readiness program, an 11-week cross-sector partnership between the los angeles unified school district (lausd) and the la/oc building trades. All program participants are paid livable wages during cohort training prior to being placed directly in union apprenticeships. We have served over 413 participants (adult and tay) thus far, with a 75% graduation rate and 82% placement rate of graduates. In the los angeles area, there is a need for skilled occupational credential programs, such as those in renewable energy.

    $2,015,676 spentof which $40,593 as grants
    10% of program spending
  5. Advocacy:arc's policy and advocacy department works to advance policy and advocacy efforts to reform our criminal legal system. Through the passage of 39 arc co-sponsored bills, our community organizing and member-led advocacy has led to reforms to california's justice system, impacting over one million justice-involved individuals. Arc empowers formerly incarcerated transitional age youth (tay) and adults to play a central role in local, state, and federal justice system reform efforts through leadership development, community organizing, and advocacy. The team leads weekly advocacy workshops open to all members to train and inform our community how to speak to legislatures and advocate for the changes they want to see.

    $1,532,861 spentof which $125,000 as grants
    8% of program spending
  6. Communications and marketing:the arc communications department leads top-line communications strategy, oversees execution and approval of owned digital properties, and serves as chief spokesperson for arc. We work to perform narrative change by shaping how currently and formerly incarcerated individuals and communities are represented, heard, and uplifted. Through storytelling, strategic messaging, and platform-building, we work to shift public perception and advance a more just understanding of incarceration, reentry, and community healing. The communications department oversees all top-level communications responsibilities for the organization, including social media strategy and content creation, email communications and newsletters, website management, and media and press relations. We ensure arc's mission, programs, and impact are communicated clearly, consistently, and powerfully across every channel. From elevating member stories to coordinating press opportunities and driving digital engagement, the communications department plays an important role in advancing arc's vision and connecting our work with the broader community.

    $487,620 spent
    2% of program spending
  7. Learning and innovation:the learning and innovation (research) program at arc serves as the organization's primary engine for data-driven advocacy and internal evaluation. This initiative bridges the gap between frontline direct services and systemic policy change by systematically documenting the successes and challenges of the reentry process. Rather than conducting academic research in a vacuum, the program focuses on participatory action research, often involving formerly incarcerated individuals in the data-gathering process. By analyzing participant outcomes across housing, employment, and wellness, the program identifies which interventions most effectively reduce recidivism and foster long-term stability. Ultimately, the program transforms individual stories of transformation into a collective data set that advocates for a more equitable and effective justice system.

    $426,311 spent
    2% of program spending

The 7 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $20,081,400.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($6.4M) Expenses 100 ($5.9M) Net assets 100 ($2.8M)2019 Revenue 127 ($8.1M) Expenses 102 ($6.0M) Net assets 179 ($5.0M)2020 Revenue 133 ($8.5M) Expenses 114 ($6.7M) Net assets 243 ($6.8M)2021 Revenue 177 ($11M) Expenses 127 ($7.5M) Net assets 400 ($11M)2022 Revenue 336 ($21M) Expenses 177 ($10M) Net assets 776 ($22M)2023 Revenue 446 ($28M) Expenses 277 ($16M) Net assets 1233 ($34M)2024 Revenue 358 ($23M) Expenses 345 ($20M) Net assets 1366 ($38M)2025 Revenue 367 ($23M) Expenses 415 ($24M) Net assets 1371 ($38M)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (367)Expenses (415)Net assets (1371)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $25M to $40M (+59%).

$3.2M
$5.5M
$8.2M
$12M
$25M
$40M
$42M
$42M
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 39% · 2019 37% · 2020 38% · 2021 42% · 2022 24% · 2023 36% · 2024 72% · 2025 58%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

95% of THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (95% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 268 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$491k
’18
$2.1M
’19
$1.8M
’20
$3.8M
’21
$11M
’22
$12M
’23
$2.5M
’24
−$970k
’25
3.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Brad Slater

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed3523222230212324
Joined·+3+2+1+8+5+3+6
No longer listed·153101415
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 25 funders to 41 funders, grant income rose $2.4M → $12M.

27 of 145 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 35% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 145 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

61% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION.

19%
largest funder
40%
top three
~14
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 28% · 2018 24% · 2019 24% · 2020 18% · 2021 15% · 2022 55% · 2023 43% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

53% of THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION's grant income comes from California funders.

WA
IL
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $21M arriving through sponsors registered in 13 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 152 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−4% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve3.2mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)20% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 152 crime & legal nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.5M on record.

Federal$1.5M
grants $1.5Mcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Labor$1.5M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 15%Fundraising 3%

Governance

14
board members
93%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 2 related entities

  • Arc Alvarado LLC · disregarded
  • Arc Bellevue LLC · disregarded

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION?
THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION (California) receives grants from 145 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,592,918 to it, the largest being BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC ($11,300,000). 73 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION have?
IRS filings report 145 organizations giving $60,592,918 in grants to THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION, 73 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION?
BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC is the largest funder on record, with $11,300,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 145 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing