Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES (California) is funded by 117 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $178,420,755 in grants to it, the largest being Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany Inc ($124,685,931). 65 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,140 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,140 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
95% of JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (21% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$13k from 2 funders in 2025, up from $11M and 25 in 2017.
23 of 117 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 24% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 117 funders by total. Association, not causation.
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 62% · 2018 63% · 2019 59% · 2020 63% · 2021 68% · 2022 74% · 2023 76% · 2024 79% · 2025 56% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
29% of JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES draws 73% of its grant income from funders outside California — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 14 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 117 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.0M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
85% of spending goes to programs.
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 1 related entity
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 117funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing