Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS

ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS (California) receives grants from 186 organizations whose IRS filings report $26,212,417 to it, the largest being CONRAD N HILTON FOUNDATION ($5,610,000). 100 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2026
$13M
Funders on record
186
Grants received
$26M
Net assets
$29M
100/186 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 64%
01What it does

What Alliance for Children's Rights does

Mission

The alliance has improved the lives of more than 178,000 young clients with stability through adoption and legal guardianship, and with access to healthcare, education, and other critical supports, serving over 5,600 children and young adults this fiscal year.

As stated on its FY2026 Form 990.

Programs

  1. System-wide reform:the alliance works at the state and local levels to develop and implement policies and practices that improve the lives and well-being of children and young adults in our child welfare systems. Through its work with a high volume of individual clients, as well as through collaboration with legal services programs and support centers across the state, the alliance is able to recognize trends, identify systemic issues and pursue reform through litigation, legislative, or administrative advocacy in order to improve outcomes and promote the well-being of children and families.the alliance also conducts training and support for child welfare, legal, educational, medical, and social service providers on the needs and rights of our communities' children and young adults, available resources to assist them, and best practices to promote their wellbeing.

    $2,306,950 spent
    24% of program spending
  2. Social services & healthcare:a child's illness can be emotionally and financially devastating for any family and, for families already living in poverty, the challenges are even greater. The alliance helps children facing medi-cal eligibility problems, treatment denials and inadequate access to physicians, dentists, and mental health services. The alliance also protects the rights of expecting and parenting teens in foster care to healthcare, and to sexual and reproductive health education, so that they have the resources and support they need to be good parents and break the inter-generational cycle of children being removed from young parents in foster care.

    $1,710,106 spent
    18% of program spending
  3. Opportunity youth collaborative:the los angeles opportunity youth collaborative (la oyc), led by the alliance, is a collective effort to improve education and employment opportunities for transition age youth ages 14 through 24, who are disconnected from school and work or have been impacted by foster care, the juvenile justice system, or homelessness in los angeles. Too often, efforts to support these young people's transition to independence fall short, due to service gaps and lack of coordination among public and private organizations. To overcome those gaps, the la oyc brings together public and private agencies, community-based organizations, foundations, educational institutions, and employers to address barriers and create pathways for young people to achieve success in school and at work. By aligning services, sharing information, identifying best practices, incorporating the voices of youth in solutions that affect them, and building the capacity of agencies with training and support, the la oyc is building partnerships to help young people succeed in their education and careers.

    $1,546,425 spent
    16% of program spending
  4. Education:more than half of all children in foster care have learning disabilities or developmental delays, often compounded by the instability created by frequent moves and school changes. The alliance levels the playing field for these children by advocating for them to receive assessments, education services, and therapies tailored to meet their unique needs. Evidence shows that reaching children at a young age will improve their healthy development and reduce the need for special education and mental health services later.in response, the alliance created the saltz family early intervention center which increases access to treatments and services for hundreds of children ages 0 - 5 every year. The alliance also works to keep youth succeeding in school and on track for high school graduation, by training educators who work with students recovering from trauma, and by ensuring they are receiving appropriate credits, tutoring, transportation, and other services to support their education, even when they must change schools.

    $1,247,340 spent
    13% of program spending
  5. Transition-age youth (tay) resources:every year, hundreds of young people "age out" of the foster care system in los angeles without a permanent family, adequate assistance, or preparation. The alliance provides targeted support to those youth ages 16 through 24, empowering them with legal advocacy, connection to resources, skill building workshops, and mentoring to overcome barriers to employment, education, housing, and healthcare. The alliance assists youth who have experienced identity thefts and financial frauds, connects youth with supportive housing, and provides targeted services for expectant and parenting youth and youth who cross into the delinquency system. For youth with disabilities, the alliance obtains benefits to help them secure and ongoing resource for housing and medical care.

    $1,130,164 spent
    12% of program spending
  6. Public benefits and services:caregivers, particularly relatives, who step up to provide for children in foster care often have limited resources and can become overwhelmed with their new responsibilities, putting the children's essential stability at risk. The alliance obtains appropriate funding and services for these children so that caregivers can provide them with basic necessities and access critical services, such as specialized medical equipment and therapies, counseling, childcare, educational services, and respite care. Securing these resources can often mean the difference between permanent, safe homes and struggling, unstable ones.

    $766,692 spent
    8% of program spending
  7. Adoption:children in foster care have a tremendous need for a stable home. Completing adoptions creates permanent, nurturing homes for these children. Working with the adoptive families to identify the children's legal, health, educational, and financial needs, the alliance also overcomes barriers to these children receiving the therapies and benefits they need. With the help of pro bono attorneys, the alliance completes adoptions out of foster care for young people throughout los angeles county, and also obtains the services necessary to stabilize the new families. With its adoption day program as a model, the alliance co-created national adoption day, which now is celebrated in every state in the country.

    $604,461 spent
    6% of program spending
  8. Children's court & guardianship:adoption is not the only means through which children who cannot remain with their parents find stable, loving caregivers. Guardianship gives caregivers legal authority for a child's educational and medical welfare. It also allows guardians access to financial support, while providing vital emotional and physical security to children who have experienced trauma. We help caregivers establish probate legal guardianship, so they have the authority to raise, and obtain medical care and education for, the young people in their care. We also provide legal assistance to youth and families navigating the web of dependency, probate, and delinquency court systems, to provide essential guidance and representation regarding informal placements, emancipation, and legal documents.

    $348,716 spent
    4% of program spending

The 8 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $9,660,854.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($5.7M) Expenses 100 ($5.6M) Net assets 100 ($11M)2018 Revenue 110 ($6.3M) Expenses 104 ($5.8M) Net assets 109 ($12M)2019 Revenue 83 ($4.7M) Expenses 103 ($5.7M) Net assets 102 ($11M)2020 Revenue 149 ($8.4M) Expenses 106 ($5.9M) Net assets 123 ($14M)2021 Revenue 146 ($8.3M) Expenses 117 ($6.5M) Net assets 155 ($17M)2022 Revenue 148 ($8.4M) Expenses 129 ($7.2M) Net assets 170 ($19M)2023 Revenue 189 ($11M) Expenses 152 ($8.4M) Net assets 183 ($20M)2024 Revenue 181 ($10M) Expenses 162 ($9.0M) Net assets 208 ($23M)2025 Revenue 253 ($14M) Expenses 200 ($11M) Net assets 242 ($27M)2026 Revenue 237 ($13M) Expenses 228 ($13M) Net assets 260 ($29M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Revenue (237)Expenses (228)Net assets (260)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $21M to $27M (+29%).

$11M
$13M
$12M
$14M
$18M
$20M
$21M
$27M
$32M
$32M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 21% · 2023 4% · 2024 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (25% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 150 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 10 reported years ran a deficit.

$120k
’17
$454k
’18
−$1.0M
’19
$2.6M
’20
$1.8M
’21
$1.2M
’22
$2.3M
’23
$1.3M
’24
$3.2M
’25
$828k
’26
4.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jennifer Braun

President & CEO

Board chair

Alex G Romain

Chair

As listed on its FY2026 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Listed42484638444448474446
Joined·+11+5+1+7+1+8+5+2+4
No longer listed·579114652
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 42 funders to 71 funders, grant income rose $1.4M → $3.6M.

22 of 186 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 29% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 186 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 21% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

45% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS.

21%
largest funder
42%
top three
~13
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 15% · 2018 17% · 2019 30% · 2020 22% · 2021 30% · 2022 30% · 2023 23% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

45% of ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

79% of ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS's grant income comes from California funders.

WA
MN
IL
NY
NV
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
WV
MD
DE
TN
SC
DC
GA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7.7M arriving through sponsors registered in 13 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS has grown faster than half of the 150 unclassified nonprofits its size.

Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 150 unclassified nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2026

Organizations like ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 14%Fundraising 10%

Governance

37
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

71%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS?
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS (California) receives grants from 186 organizations whose IRS filings report $26,212,417 to it, the largest being CONRAD N HILTON FOUNDATION ($5,610,000). 100 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS have?
IRS filings report 186 organizations giving $26,212,417 in grants to ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, 100 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS?
CONRAD N HILTON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $5,610,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Alliance for Children's Rights →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 186 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing