Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Rose Hills Foundation

Support qualified tax-exempt charitable organizations which promote the welfare of humankind for the benefit of people in southern california.

$28M
Granted FY2024still arriving
297
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$63MHuman Services$30MArts & Culture$17MYouth Development$14MHealth$13MHousing & Shelter$12MFood & Nutrition$5.2MCrime & Legal$3.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 297 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k81 grants · $2.0M
  • $50k–250k187 grants · $16M
  • $250k+26 grants · $9.8M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$561M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HUNTINGTON LIBRARY ART MUSEUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$500,000
OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE$500,000
CHARLES DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE$500,000
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$500,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$500,000
UNCOMMON GOOD$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$400,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$400,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$400,000
MARYVALE$350,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$333,333
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$330,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$325,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $30.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICE: $250k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICE: $250k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICE: $250k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICE: $250k → 14%JENESSE CENTER INC: $150k → 14%JENESSE CENTER INC: $150k → 14%JENESSE CENTER INC: $150k → 14%MARYVALE: $350k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $250k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $250k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $150k → 14%HARVEST HOME: $300k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $150k → 14%MYCHAL'S LEARNING PLACE: $200k → 14%THE RICHSTONE CENTER INC: $150k → 14%THE RICHSTONE CENTER INC: $150k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $250k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $200k → 14%RESOURCE FOR EDUCATION ADVOCACY COMMUNICATION AND HOUSING: $266k → 14%HILLSIDES: $250k → 14%HOPE (HOME OWNERSHIP FOR PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT): $250k → 14%HOME OWNERSHIP FOR PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT INC: $250k → 14%HOPE (HOME OWNERSHIP FOR PERSONAL E: $250k → 14%HOME OWNERSHIP FOR PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT INC: $179k → 14%SYCAMORES: $200k → 14%HATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES DBA SYCAMORES: $200k → 14%ST ANNES MATERNITY HOME: $300k → 14%ST ANNES MATERNITY HOME: $300k → 14%ST ANNE'S FAMILY SERVICES: $250k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $250k → 14%ST ANNE'S FAMILY SERVICES: $250k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $250k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $200k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $200k → 14%HOPE THE MISSION: $158k → 14%HILLSIDES: $250k → 14%UNCOMMON GOOD: $500k → 14%UNCOMMON GOOD: $500k → 14%UNCOMMON GOOD: $263k → 14%UNCOMMON GOOD: $263k → 14%UNCOMMON GOOD: $213k → 14%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $200k → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $1.3M → 14%WELLNEST EMOTIONAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS: $500k → 14%LOS ANGELES CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC: $250k → 14%WELLNEST: $200k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 14%SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES CALIFORNIA: $1.0M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$147M · 388 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

388 repeat relationships — 216 still active in FY2024, 172 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

388
110

Total granted

$147M
$9.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+18%

Still filing today

96%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HE
    HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +99%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +35%
  • HM
    Harvey Mudd College
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $1.0M · revenue +4%
  • TC
    TOGETHER CALIFORNIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +45%
  • TS
    THE SEED SCHOOL OF LOS ANGELES COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +268%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Central Los Angeles Regional Center for Dev Disabled Persons Inc

South central los angeles regional center, (sclarc), believes special needs deserve special attention. we are committed to the provision of culturally sensitive services which enhance the inherent strengths of the family and enable…

Human Services
2
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
3
La's Best

La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).

Education
4
Alternative Schools Inc

To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.

Education
5
Cangress Dba Los Angeles Community Action Network

Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.

Community Improvement
6
Los Angeles Education Partnership

To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.

—
7
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
8
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
9
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
10
Westside Neighborhood School

Wns is committed to creating a deeply caring community of lifelong learners that nurtures students from diverse backgrounds to reach their full potential, develop cultural competency, and inspire the world with their curiosity, innovation,…

Education
11
Hollywood Schoolhouse Inc

Hollywood Schoolhouse knows, values, and encourages fearless curiosity. Through a blended program of innovative academics and structured learning, our diverse community inspires students to be academically strong, artistically proud,…

Education
12
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Glendale and Pasadena and the most unlike its peers is A P Giannini Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%1%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr12%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr10%19%35–55yr12%50%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%3/534
the rest of the field
16%
7,864/49,282

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

509 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 509 of the 535 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
117
Early backer (in before they grew)
500/509
Grantees still filing
411/509
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $8,375,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA A…REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $6,050,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE — $4,841,250 · OtherUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCEREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE — $3,025,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA A…VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC — $2,070,000 · Other+66 more — $28,334,281 · Other+66 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $8,125,687 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TH…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $5,770,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALI…CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $3,041,666 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TEC…Harvey Mudd College — $2,425,000 · EducationHarvey Mudd CollegeOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE — $1,856,667 · EducationOCCIDENTAL COLLEGECHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE — $1,500,000 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $1,450,000 · EducationMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY — $1,175,000 · Education+22 more — $8,942,250 · Education+22 moreUNCOMMON GOOD — $2,037,500 · Human ServicesUNCOMMON GOODYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $1,810,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian…St Anne's Family Services — $1,300,000 · Human ServicesHATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $1,180,000 · Human ServicesFoothill Family Service — $1,100,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $1,080,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER CALIFORNIA INC — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesHOME OWNERSHIP FOR PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT INC — $979,000 · Human ServicesHILLSIDES — $950,000 · Human ServicesWellnest Emotional Health & Wellness — $950,000 · Human Services+36 more — $15,093,500 · Human Services+36 moreHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $3,672,500 · Arts & CultureHENRY E HU…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $2,000,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELE…LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION — $1,350,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELE…PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY — $1,000,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMING…SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $950,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL C…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $755,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN C…PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $575,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WENDE MUSEUM OF THE COLD WAR INC — $560,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COLBURN SCHOOL — $550,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more — $2,280,000 · Arts & Culture+8 morePROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $975,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $600,000 · HealthMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $500,000 · HealthWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER — $450,000 · HealthOptimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc — $400,000 · HealthSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER — $350,000 · HealthHERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER — $335,000 · HealthOLIVE CREST — $325,000 · HealthPHOENIX HOUSES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $300,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER — $300,000 · HealthNATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $300,000 · HealthTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC — $300,000 · HealthThe Whole Child - Mental Health & Housing Services — $275,000 · HealthLOS ANGELES CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERS — $275,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA — $275,000 · HealthWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK — $250,000 · HealthPOMONA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $250,000 · HealthHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $975,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $875,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $775,000 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $585,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOS ANGELES — $575,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $375,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC — $285,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC — $275,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PAINTED TURTLE — $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentABODE COMMUNITIES — $525,000 · Housing & ShelterLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $500,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY HOPE dba ELIZABETH HOUSE — $495,000 · Housing & ShelterVENICE COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION — $375,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER PARTNERSHIP INC — $350,000 · Housing & ShelterWEINGART CENTER ASSOCIATION — $340,000 · Housing & ShelterM F PLACE INC — $302,500 · Housing & ShelterWEST HOLLYWOOD COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP — $275,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTER FOR THE PACIFIC-ASIAN FAMILY INC — $270,000 · Housing & ShelterHOLLYWOOD COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION — $250,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$52,695,531Education$34,286,270Human Services$27,480,000Arts & Culture$13,692,500Health$6,460,000Youth Development$4,970,000Housing & Shelter$3,682,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $8,125,687 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $5,770,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $3,672,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $3,041,666 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHarvey Mudd College — $2,425,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetUNCOMMON GOOD — $2,037,500 over 7y, 10% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $2,000,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE — $1,856,667 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $1,810,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE — $1,500,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $1,450,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLULU'S PLACE INC — $1,383,334 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION — $1,350,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSt Anne's Family Services — $1,300,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $1,180,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY — $1,175,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFoothill Family Service — $1,100,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $1,080,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES — $1,075,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,070,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER — $1,060,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTOGETHER CALIFORNIA INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetHOME OWNERSHIP FOR PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT INC — $979,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $975,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $975,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetHILLSIDES — $950,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWellnest Emotional Health & Wellness — $950,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $950,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $925,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $910,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetST VINCENT SENIOR CITIZEN NUTRITION PROGRAM INC — $900,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $875,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $815,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $775,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $755,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMARYVALE — $700,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $675,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH — $650,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS — $650,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $600,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $600,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $600,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $585,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOS ANGELES — $575,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetPUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $575,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHarvest Home Inc — $570,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetTHE WENDE MUSEUM OF THE COLD WAR INC — $560,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Harvey Mudd College ↗
  • Who funds UNCOMMON GOOD ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LULU'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Anne's Family Services ↗
  • Who funds HATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Foothill Family Service ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME OWNERSHIP FOR PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDES ↗
  • Who funds Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness ↗
  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT SENIOR CITIZEN NUTRITION PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…The Ahmanson Foundati…The Green FoundationWeingart FoundationS Mark Taper Foundati…The Annenberg Foundat…United Way IncElbridge Stuart Found…California Community …Pasadena Community Fo…Shelter Partnership I…Carrie Estelle Doheny…
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA339.6× affinity252 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Green Foundation · Weingart Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · United Way Inc · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · California Community Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rose Hills Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
89report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 535 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home