Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Select Equity Group Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
854
Grants FY2025still arriving
41
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$9.0MHealth$7.3MArts & Culture$6.8MCrime & Legal$4.3MHuman Services$2.6MYouth Development$2.2MHousing & Shelter$2.0MInternational$1.8MOther$0
02FY2025 · 854 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k713 grants · $1.0M
  • $10k–50k90 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k49 grants · $3.7M
  • $250k+2 grants · $759k
$1,500
Median grant
41
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$500,000
CAF AMERICA$259,258
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$200,000
GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT REPORT FOR AMERICA$175,000
THE INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE CITIZENSHIP$160,000
DREAM$150,000
DARKNESS TO LIGHT$128,250
INADCURE FOUNDATION$100,640
HOSPICE CARE NETWORK$88,500
LEAD EXPOSURE ELIMINATION PROJECT$86,112
Individual grant recipient$82,560
Individual grant recipient$82,440
SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION$80,000
SAFE HORIZON$76,960
WORKFORCE OPPORTUNITY SERVICES$73,950
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHARITY WATER: $62k → 4%CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $72k → 14%Bridges Outreach: $49k → 10%CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $72k → 14%BRIDGES OUTREACH: $49k → 10%ChadTough Defeat DIPG Foundation: $72k → 14%ChadTough Defeat DIPG Foundation: $72k → 14%ROOM TO GROW: $60k → 28%ROOM TO GROW: $60k → 28%HOSPICE CARE NETWORK: $89k → 6%ROOM TO GROW: $60k → 28%HOSPICE CARE NETWORK: $89k → 6%HOSPICE CARE NETWORK: $89k → 6%FORESTDALE INC: $52k → 13%FORESTDALE INC: $46k → 13%Graham Windham: $49k → 20%Graham Windham: $49k → 20%The Blue Card: $54k → 17%The Blue Card: $48k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $48k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $48k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $48k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $77k → 17%Safe Horizon: $45k → 17%Safe Horizon: $45k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $45k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $45k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $44k → 17%Safe Horizon: $44k → 17%Safe Horizon: $44k → 17%Safe Horizon: $44k → 17%Room to Grow: $100k → 17%Room to Grow: $75k → 17%Room to Grow: $60k → 17%Room to Grow: $60k → 17%Room to Grow: $60k → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $53k → 17%charity water: $41k → 17%charity water: $41k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $40k → 17%charity water: $40k → 17%IAVA: $40k → 17%IAVA: $35k → 17%IAVA: $45k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $32k → 17%TEAK Fellowship: $29k → 17%TEAK Fellowship: $29k → 17%TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $29k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Select Equity Group Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 51% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Select Equity Group Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44M · 738 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

738 repeat relationships — 345 still active in FY2025, 393 since wound down; 157 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

738
795

Total granted

$44M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+5%

Still filing today

72%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $638k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    4× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +76%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE CITIZENSHIP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $957k · revenue +100%
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $939k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -80%
  • LE
    LEAD EXPOSURE ELIMINATION PROJECT
    one grant, 2024 · $96k
  • PP
    Pet Partners
    one grant, 2021 · $81k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Institute for Aegean Prehistory. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Local Food System Organizat…Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Development ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringLgbtq+ Community SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsSchool Parent OrganizationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Community College Foundatio…Animal Rescue and ShelterFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Addiction Recovery ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity Food PantriesPublic Library OperationsChristian Youth CampsEquine Therapy ProgramsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Dance Arts OrganizationsLocal History MuseumsSenior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsSchool District FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Immigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence ServicesCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr19%37%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.7% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%9/1,256
the rest of the field
10%
11,852/119,504

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

1180 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1180 of the 1,720 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
198
Early backer (in before they grew)
1161/1180
Grantees still filing
726/1180
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DREAM — $1,491,048 · OtherDREAMGROUNDTRUTH PROJECT REPORT FOR AMERICA — $828,014 · Other+117 more — $18,776,971 · Other+117 moreNew York University — $1,203,775 · EducationNew York Universi…INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE CITIZENSHIP — $956,750 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR RES…ROOM TO READ — $497,472 · EducationROOM TO READTHE GO PROJECT INC — $416,060 · EducationTHE GO PROJECT IN…THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC — $396,859 · EducationTHE POSSE FOUNDAT…AMERICA NEEDS YOU — $383,473 · EducationAMERICA NEEDS YOUEDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK — $375,627 · EducationEDIBLE SCHOOLYARD…THE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $355,271 · EducationTHE ONE LOVE FOUN…WORKFORCE OUTSOURCE SERVICES INC dba WORKFORCE OPPORTUNITY SERVICES — $306,110 · Education+18 more — $1,486,215 · Education+18 morePRO PUBLICA INC — $541,774 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLIC…NEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC — $436,147 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK T…NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $363,175 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL …NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $345,620 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK S…LINCOLN COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE — $257,500 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CO…OUR RESCUE — $254,153 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUEMAGNUM CULTURAL FOUNDATION — $250,150 · Arts & CultureMAGNUM CUL…Clubbed Thumb Inc — $245,575 · Arts & CultureClubbed Th…THE WOOSTER GROUP INC — $186,678 · Arts & CultureTHE NORTHAMPTON ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC — $142,250 · Arts & Culture+11 more — $876,501 · Arts & Culture+11 moreROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC — $627,991 · Human ServicesROOM TO G…SAFE HORIZON INC — $451,158 · Human ServicesSAFE HORI…CHARITY GLOBAL INC — $379,196 · Human ServicesCHARITY G…CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION — $308,046 · Human ServicesCHADTOUGH…BRIDGES OUTREACH INC — $275,815 · Human ServicesBRIDGES O…THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC — $274,051 · Human ServicesTHE TEAK …HOSPICE CARE NETWORK — $273,400 · Human ServicesHOSPICE C…THE BLUE CARD INC — $265,089 · Human ServicesTHE BLUE …IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC — $179,250 · Human ServicesBOTTOMLESS CLOSET — $168,717 · Human ServicesGRAHAM WINDHAM — $128,285 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $126,750 · Human Services+3 more — $163,225 · Human ServicesDARKNESS TO LIGHT INC — $937,016 · Crime & LegalSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $654,253 · Crime & LegalROOT & REBOUND — $449,531 · Crime & LegalVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC — $400,861 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $50,000 · Crime & LegalCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION — $628,230 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $520,397 · HealthCRISIS TEXT LINE INC — $502,375 · HealthEVERY MOTHER COUNTS — $451,958 · HealthCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy — $169,900 · HealthINADCURE FOUNDATION INC — $109,240 · Health+2 more — $98,830 · HealthEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $938,622 · Civil RightsNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC — $703,390 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC — $336,128 · Civil RightsPROJECT ON PREDATORY STUDENT LENDING — $158,540 · Civil Rights+1 more — $30,583 · Civil Rights
Other$21,096,033Education$6,377,612Arts & Culture$3,899,523Human Services$3,620,973Crime & Legal$2,491,661Health$2,480,930Civil Rights$2,167,263

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew York University — $1,203,775 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE CITIZENSHIP — $956,750 over 6y, 12% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $938,622 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDARKNESS TO LIGHT INC — $937,016 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC — $703,390 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL — $697,761 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetROW NEW YORK INC — $695,184 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $654,253 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC — $640,905 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $630,671 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION — $628,230 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC — $627,991 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $614,693 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $584,124 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $541,774 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $520,397 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $503,658 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS TEXT LINE INC — $502,375 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetROOM TO READ — $497,472 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $491,068 over 9y, 7.7% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS — $451,958 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC — $451,158 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetROOT & REBOUND — $449,531 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC — $436,147 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetExtreme Kids and Crew Inc — $432,118 over 8y, 24% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC — $416,060 over 9y, 12% of budgetST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC — $405,710 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetPET PARTNERS — $405,030 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC — $400,861 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC — $396,859 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $394,171 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICA NEEDS YOU — $383,473 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $379,196 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK — $375,627 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $363,175 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $355,271 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $345,620 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWILD EARTH WILDERNESS SCHOOL — $339,038 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $336,128 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMICHAEL MOSIER DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION — $326,534 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetEDESIA INC — $323,402 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION — $308,046 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetWORKFORCE OUTSOURCE SERVICES INC dba WORKFORCE OPPORTUNITY SERVICES — $306,110 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC — $305,113 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetACUMEN FUND INC — $283,975 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION INC — $282,230 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetBRIDGES OUTREACH INC — $275,815 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC — $274,051 over 9y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR RESPONSIBLE CITIZENSHIP
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds DARKNESS TO LIGHT INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC
  • Who funds UPWARDLY GLOBAL
  • Who funds ROW NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds CRISIS TEXT LINE INC
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ
  • Who funds THE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds EVERY MOTHER COUNTS
  • Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC
  • Who funds ROOT & REBOUND
  • Who funds NEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC
  • Who funds Extreme Kids and Crew Inc
  • Who funds THE GO PROJECT INC
  • Who funds ST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds PET PARTNERS
  • Who funds VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC
  • Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC
  • Who funds AMERICA NEEDS YOU
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD NEW YORK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ44.7× affinity51 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · McKenna Family Fund · The Warburg Pincus Foundation · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Tapestry Foundation Inc · Tiger Baron Foundation Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Select Equity Group Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 120%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Bridges Outreach Inc25% of income from government
  • EcoHealth Alliance Inc24% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc22% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc6% of income from government
  • Melvin J Berman Hebrew Academy2% of income from government
  • The Northampton Academy of Music Inc1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College1% of income from government
  • Compass Working Capital Inc1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University1% of income from government
  • Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras Inc1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
50report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Select Equity Group Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Select Equity Group Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1720 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph