How much did LILY AUCHINCLOSS FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of LILY AUCHINCLOSS FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

teamlittle sisterssisters assumptionethical cultureculture fieldstonbookred hook

2019

graduatewomen'smuseum artsurbanneighborhoodtheatrerockaway

2020

actionequityprisonwomen'smatterbreadartists

2021

greaterali forneyenvironmentalwomen'sside againstbreadartists

2022

fabscrapjazzbookstudio theatertheater performanceperformance researchliving

2023

broadwayoysterjazzradiohistoricarttheatre

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 168 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k21 grants · $81k
$10k–50k144 grants · $3.0M
$50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$250k+1 grant · $1.0M

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$66M

Total assets

Largest grants

FOUNTAIN HOUSE$1,000,000
NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST$100,000
RIVERKEEPER$100,000
HOLY APOSTLES SOUP KITCHEN$40,000
RED HOOK INITIATIVE$30,000
CENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION$30,000
QUEENS MUSEUM OF ART$30,000
SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES$30,000
CASA-NYC$30,000
BRONX MUSEUM OF THE ARTS$30,000
LA MAMA EXPERIMENTAL THEATRE CLUB$30,000
STUDIO IN A SCHOOL$30,000
BROOKLYN COMMUNITY HOUSING AND SERVICES$30,000
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK$30,000
FLUSHING COUNCIL ON CULTURE AND THE ARTS$30,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$23M · 277 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

277 repeat relationships — 124 still active in FY2024, 153 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

277

177

Total granted

$23M

$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+36%

Still filing today

70%

54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $597k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FH
FOUNTAIN HOUSE
8× · 2017–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +7%
R
RIVERKEEPER
6× · 2017–2024 · $620k · revenue +34%
CP
CITY PARKS FOUNDATION
5× · 2019–2023 · $390k · revenue +19%

Funded once

MO
MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
one grant, 2017 · $261k
DT
DESIGN TRUST FOR PUBLIC SPACE
one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +23%
WS
WE STAY NOS QUEDAMOSgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +318%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Young Audiences New York Inc

Using art, as a catalyst for exploring creativity and advancing equity among communities in nyc.

Arts & Culture

New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

To empower artists at critical stages in their creative lives

Arts & Culture

Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunites for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement

New York City Energy Efficiency

Delivering financing solutions and advancing markets for energy efficiency and clean energy.

Environment

The Center for New York City

Housing & Shelter

Nycxd Inc

Unite, advance, and strengthen nyc's diverse and global design community for the sake of marketing and fast description.

—

Openplans Inc

Open plans' mission is to transform how people experience new york city's streets.

Public Benefit

New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture

New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful, see schedule o.

Arts & Culture

Brooklyn Arts Council Inc

To enrich the quality of life of the residents of brooklyn through the promotion of the arts in the community.

Arts & Culture

Riders Alliance Inc

Riders alliance is fighting for a world-class public transit system that meets the everyday needs of all new yorkers and takes us toward a more equitable city and sustainable future.

Civil Rights

Manhattan Theatre Club Inc

Manhattan theatre club, inc. is a leading producer of new works along with significant revivals.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community-Word Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Museum of Chinese in America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%3/321

the rest of the field

10%

3,932/39,914

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

318 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

118

Early backer (in before they grew)

313/318

Grantees still filing

251/318

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$12,720,500Arts & Culture$4,258,000Health$3,735,000Environment$2,605,500Human Services$1,664,000Education$990,000Recreation & Sports$931,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ165.8× affinity116 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · City Parks Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Altman Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Scherman Foundation Inc · New York Women's Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LILY AUCHINCLOSS FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DYCKMAN FARMHOUSE MUSEUM ALLIANCE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~27 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 320035632 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DYCKMAN FARMHOUSE MUSEUM ALLIANCE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 27 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 47% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LILY AUCHINCLOSS FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

318 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

LILY AUCHINCLOSS FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

318 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph