Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

New York · Nonprofit

NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN

NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN (New York) receives grants from 454 organizations whose IRS filings report $116,675,932 to it, the largest being LUESTHER T MERTZ CHARITABLE TRUST ($34,962,500). 290 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$125M
Revenue FY2025
454
Funders on record
$117M
Grants received
$653M
Net assets
290/454 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 28%

Against its field

NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 13 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin16% · top quartile
Months of reserve2.7mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13 environment nonprofits over $100M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($89M) Expenses 100 ($85M) Net assets 100 ($484M)2018 Revenue 122 ($109M) Expenses 104 ($88M) Net assets 108 ($521M)2019 Revenue 98 ($88M) Expenses 102 ($87M) Net assets 110 ($531M)2020 Revenue 98 ($88M) Expenses 98 ($83M) Net assets 108 ($521M)2021 Revenue 110 ($98M) Expenses 99 ($84M) Net assets 129 ($624M)2022 Revenue 114 ($102M) Expenses 112 ($95M) Net assets 119 ($577M)2023 Revenue 98 ($87M) Expenses 119 ($101M) Net assets 120 ($579M)2024 Revenue 124 ($110M) Expenses 120 ($102M) Net assets 125 ($607M)2025 Revenue 140 ($125M) Expenses 123 ($105M) Net assets 135 ($653M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (140)Expenses (123)Net assets (135)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 22% · 2018 21% · 2019 20% · 2020 34% · 2021 21% · 2022 23% · 2023 19% · 2024 17% · 2025 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

61% of NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (90% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 22 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$3.9M
17
$21M
18
$593k
19
$4.4M
20
$14M
21
$6.3M
22
$14M
23
$8.4M
24
$20M
25
2.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 116 funders to 195 funders, grant income rose $9.6M → $11M.

23 of 454 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)16% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $2.3M from 12 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Jewish Communal Fund). These are real filings, and they are not money NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN raised.

From the IRS filings of NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 454 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 30% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left

30%
largest funder
41%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 32% · 2018 40% · 2019 48% · 2020 38% · 2021 51% · 2022 8% · 2023 12%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

44% of NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 64% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

73% of NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN's grant income comes from New York funders.

ME
VT
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $18M arriving through sponsors registered in 15 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 454 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $13.9M on record — $13.9M federal, $13k state.

Federal$13.9M
grants $13.9Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • National Science Foundation$9.2M
  • Institute of Museum and Library Services$1.9M
  • National Endowment for the Humanities$1.3M
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration$790k
  • Department of Commerce$500k
  • National Endowment for the Arts$175k
State$13k
07
08
09
10
11
Top programs
  • FEDERAL$13k
  • DEDICATED$706

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 14%Fundraising 7%

Governance

58
board members
98%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

90%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 37 states

AK
ME
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
FL

Part of a family of 3 related entities

  • North Central Bronx Real Estate LLC · disregarded
  • Bedford Garden Bronx LLC · disregarded
  • The Luesther T Mertz Legacy Trust for the New York Botanical Garden · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN?
NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN (New York) receives grants from 454 organizations whose IRS filings report $116,675,932 to it, the largest being LUESTHER T MERTZ CHARITABLE TRUST ($34,962,500). 290 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN have?
IRS filings report 454 organizations giving $116,675,932 in grants to NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN, 290 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN?
LUESTHER T MERTZ CHARITABLE TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $34,962,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 454funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing