Loading…
Loading…
Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
Reporters Without Borders Inc (Washington, D.C.) is funded by 48 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $4,828,642 in grants to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($2,115,665). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Reporters Without Borders Inc is better cushioned than half of the 1,675 civil rights nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,675 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
98% of Reporters Without Borders Inc’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (99% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
$92k from 6 funders in 2025, up from $250k and 3 in 2017.
12 of 48 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 65% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Reporters Without Borders Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 48 funders by total. Association, not causation.
Reporters Without Borders Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 44% of grant income and the top three 60%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 40% · 2018 52% · 2019 89% · 2020 76% · 2021 32% · 2022 19% · 2023 33% · 2024 52% · 2025 66% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
26% of Reporters Without Borders Inc's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
Reporters Without Borders Inc draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C. — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 19 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 48 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
81% of spending goes to programs.
74%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 7 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 48funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing