· Private foundation
The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of THE ACHELIS & BODMAN FOUNDATION CO MANICE & BUDD LLP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k64 grants · $1.6M
- $50k–250k64 grants · $4.2M
- $250k+2 grants · $800k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY | $500,000 |
| MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH | $300,000 |
| HUDSON INSTITUTE | $200,000 |
| ATLAS NETWORK TWO LIBERTY CENTER | $150,000 |
| NEW-YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $150,000 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $150,000 |
| GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY | $125,000 |
| AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH | $100,000 |
| SMART APPROACHES TO MARIJUANA | $100,000 |
| CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| EMPIRE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY | $100,000 |
| FRESH AIR FUND | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $75,000 |
| HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| GRACE INSTITUTE | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
167 repeat relationships — 88 still active in FY2024, 79 since wound down; 57 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY5× · 2020–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +1%
- MIMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +38%
- HIHudson Institute Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +283%
Funded once
- CSCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +26%
- AFACHIEVEMENT FIRST INCone grant, 2021 · $160k · revenue -15%
- FOFRIENDS OF THE LOBKOWICZ COLLECTIONSone grant, 2023 · $102k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is I Am Cultured Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
357 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 357 of the 471 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds Hudson Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds New York Historical Society ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
- Who funds The Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center Inc ↗
- Who funds EMPIRE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Christodora Inc ↗
- Who funds HETERODOX ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds VERTEX PARTNERSHIP ACADEMIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMON GOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds BILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
- Who funds VISITING NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds St Johns Bread & Life Program Inc ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Thomas B Fordham Institute ↗
- Who funds NEW CITY KIDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Sarah Scaife Foundation Incorporated · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · The Barker Welfare Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bridges from School to Work Inc — 33% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Mercy Center Corporation — 21% of income from government
- Child Rescue Coalition Inc — 20% of income from government
- Shore Clubhouse Inc — 7% of income from government
- Cheshire Home Inc — 6% of income from government
- Lunch Break Inc — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Students 2 Science Inc — 1% of income from government
- Achievement First Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP?
Find your warmest path to The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.