· Private foundation
William Randolph Hearst Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k52 grants · $214k
- $10k–50k30 grants · $643k
- $50k–250k144 grants · $19M
- $250k+38 grants · $15M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| New York-Presbyterian Hospital | $2,000,000 |
| Norton Museum of Art | $1,000,000 |
| The Paley Center for Media | $500,000 |
| Inner City Scholarship ( Partnership Schools) | $500,000 |
| Columbia University in the City of NY | $500,000 |
| The Juilliard School | $500,000 |
| Alamo Trust Inc | $500,000 |
| Los Angeles County Museum of Art | $500,000 |
| Covenant House | $500,000 |
| Harvard University | $500,000 |
| University of California San Francisco | $375,000 |
| The New York Botanical Garden | $375,000 |
| Pioneer Works Art Foundation | $350,000 |
| Yale University | $350,000 |
| Texas Children's Hospital | $300,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $8.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
218 repeat relationships — 117 still active in FY2024, 101 since wound down; 122 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +13%
- PWPIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +2%
NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC3× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +79%
Funded once
- TSTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1.7M · revenue +55%
- NYNew York Presbyterianone grant, 2021 · $1.6M
- NYNew York University-School of Medicine (NYUSOM)one grant, 2020 · $1.4M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Skystone Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
772 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 772 of the 1,145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK GENOME CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
- Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY ↗
- Who funds ST PETER'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE PALEY CENTER FOR MEDIA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The New York Community Trust · Pinkerton Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Altman Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Barker Welfare Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William Randolph Hearst Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Coast Aquarium Inc — 24% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- William James College Inc — 11% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Artists for Humanity Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jackson Health Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Franciscan Hospital for Children — 0% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Sheppard Pratt Health System Inc — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to William Randolph Hearst Foundation?
Find your warmest path to William Randolph Hearst Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.