Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC

NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC (New York) receives grants from 215 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,704,057 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($7,086,812). 107 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 65% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$5.4M
Funders on record
215
Grants received
$13M
Net assets
$20M
107/215 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 49%
01What it does

What New York Landmarks Conservancy Inc does

Mission

The conservancy preserves and revitalizes new york's architecture. By doing so, it contributes to new york's economy, tourism and quality of life.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The conservancy's sacred sites program -helps congregations throughout new york maintain, repair, and restore their historic buildings with referrals, grants, workshops, and publications. Since its launch in 1986, the program has given 1,695 grants to over 867 congregations. It is one of the only statewide programs in the nation responding to the preservation needs of historic religious properties.

    $1,389,599 spentof which $649,250 as grants
    43% of program spending
  2. The conservancy's public policy program -the conservancy's advocacy protects and celebrates the buildings, streetscapes and neighborhoods that define new york. We support landmark designations, speak out on proposals that affect landmarked buildings and engage in campaigns to improve the regulations and processes that govern how our city grows and evolves.

    $645,229 spent$77,195 earned by the program
    20% of program spending
  3. The conservancy's new york city historic properties fund -established in 1982, the new york city historic properties fund is the conservancy's main financing vehicle for restoration work throughout new york city. With almost $10 million in assets, it is one of the largest revolving loan funds for historic preservation in the nation. Since its inception, the fund has made over $33 million in investments.

    $503,494 spentof which $89,972 as grants
    15% of program spending
  4. The conservancy's emergency preservation grants program largely funded by the new york community trust, provides funding to nonprofit organizations to address immediate repair needs and/or professional services to remedy dangerous exterior conditions (falling masonry, spot water leakage, etc.) and/or deteriorated interior structural elements of buildings. Most grants range between $10,000 and $20,000 and are accompanied by project management assistance from conservancy staff. 2024 marks a milestone accomplishment since the program's inception with over $1,000,000 in project funding to assist nonprofits with unanticipated repairs to their historic buildings. .

    $254,245 spentof which $61,700 as grants
    8% of program spending
  5. The conservancy's technical services department provides countless hours of one-on-one advice and technical assistance to building owners throughout the city. From site visits to referrals, we offer practical recommendations that address a wide variety of questions and issues. We also help owners navigate the city's landmarks regulatory process.

    $223,693 spentof which $14,875 as grants
    7% of program spending
  6. The nonprofit technical assistance grant (ntag) program, generously supported by the altman and hearst foundations, seeks to empower nonprofit property owners by supporting them with the financial and technical assistance they need to maintain and restore their buildings. Ntag provides grants of up to $30,000 to enhance the character of landmarked and non-landmarked but architecturally significant buildings. All ntag grants are accompanied by the project management services of conservancy staff, consulting architects, and engineers. Many nonprofit organizations own and/or are stewards of hundreds of properties that provide essential neighborhood services. Since 1986, the program has invested over $1.7 million into 82 buildings in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods across the city. The ntag program creates an important link between preservation and community development in new york city and gives the conservancy an opportunity to partner with nonprofit organizations to increase the scope and range of its work.

    $95,348 spentof which $20,000 as grants
    3% of program spending
  7. The conservancy's endangered building fund was established in 1984 to safeguard significant buildings in imminent danger of destruction. When landmarks are endangered, the conservancy is there to help with financial, either grants or loans and technical assistance.

    $84,948 spentof which $28,000 as grants$453 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  8. The conservancy's preservation easements fund holds a total of 46 preservation easements. An easement is a voluntary legal agreement between a property owner and a nonprofit organization that restricts future changes to the property and requires cyclical inspections by the nonprofit. The easement stays with the property even if sold; this assures that the historic properties are well maintained. Property owners who give easements received a one-time federal tax. All the properties are listed on the national register of historic places.

    $60,980 spent
    2% of program spending

The 8 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,257,536.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.4M) Expenses 100 ($3.7M) Net assets 100 ($13M)2018 Revenue 113 ($4.9M) Expenses 102 ($3.7M) Net assets 102 ($14M)2019 Revenue 101 ($4.4M) Expenses 116 ($4.3M) Net assets 118 ($16M)2020 Revenue 94 ($4.1M) Expenses 122 ($4.5M) Net assets 126 ($17M)2021 Revenue 128 ($5.6M) Expenses 110 ($4.0M) Net assets 145 ($19M)2022 Revenue 144 ($6.3M) Expenses 123 ($4.5M) Net assets 132 ($18M)2023 Revenue 106 ($4.6M) Expenses 126 ($4.6M) Net assets 142 ($19M)2024 Revenue 125 ($5.4M) Expenses 123 ($4.5M) Net assets 152 ($20M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (125)Expenses (123)Net assets (152)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $20M to $23M (+14%).

$14M
$15M
$17M
$18M
$20M
$23M
$24M
$25M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 1% · 2019 1% · 2020 1% · 2021 11% · 2022 1% · 2023 1% · 2024 2%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$699k
’17
$1.2M
’18
$159k
’19
−$378k
’20
$1.5M
’21
$1.8M
’22
−$16k
’23
$939k
’24
8.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed3539414045444241
Joined·+5+4+4+45+6+3+7
No longer listed·12540758
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 51 funders to 72 funders, grant income rose $469k → $2.0M.

14 of 215 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 65% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 215 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 63%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

66% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC.

56%
largest funder
63%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 32% · 2018 25% · 2019 31% · 2020 61% · 2021 60% · 2022 53% · 2023 54% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

35% of NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

65% of NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $4.4M that is directly attributable, 70% of it comes from New York funders.

NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $8.3M arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

73% of spending goes to programs.

Program 73%Management 11%Fundraising 16%

Governance

28
board members
96%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

60%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

NY
NJ

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC?
NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC (New York) receives grants from 215 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,704,057 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($7,086,812). 107 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 65% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC have?
IRS filings report 215 organizations giving $12,704,057 in grants to NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC, 107 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $7,086,812 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 215 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing