· Public charity
Network for Good
To increase charitable giving to nonprofits by providing the public with an easy, safe, and efficient way to recommend grants to the public charity of their choice.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1222 grants · $8.8M
- $10k–50k2528 grants · $59M
- $50k–250k908 grants · $88M
- $250k+75 grants · $61M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DURABLE CAPITAL FOR SUSTAINABLE OUTCOMES INC | $27,470,534 |
| DUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES | $2,006,371 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS | $1,231,442 |
| COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS | $945,547 |
| CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA INC | $929,107 |
| YOUTH WITH A MISSION LOUISVILLE INC | $800,541 |
| THE LIFE YOU CAN SAVE | $765,764 |
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $752,511 |
| A WIDER CIRCLE | $723,109 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TENNESSEE INC | $654,861 |
| FOOD BANK OF NORTH ALABAMA | $649,994 |
| ALAMEDA EMERGENCY FOOD DBA ALAMEDA FOOD BANK | $624,369 |
| KYLE PEASE FOUNDATION INC | $604,935 |
| CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION | $603,911 |
| PAWS OF WAR INC | $602,172 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $69.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
1932 repeat relationships — 1216 still active in FY2024, 716 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE8× · 2017–2024 · $17M · revenue +101%- M2Matthew 25 Ministries Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $14M · revenue +28%
- SESANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA8× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +102% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- NWNA WAHINE TOA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $2.8M · revenue -99% · 89% of their budget
- SASTUDENTS AROUND THE WORLDone grant, 2017 · $865k
- SCSeattle Children's Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $830k · revenue +190%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improving the lives of animals and people through advocacy, education, and support.
Petconnect rescue is a foster-based animal welfare organization dedicated to saving at-risk dogs and cats, providing them with high quality care, and adopting them to loving homes. we are committed to ensuring a highly positive rescue…
Animal aid of portland enhances the welfare of companion animals through individualized care and lifelong commitment, rescue and adoption, resources and education, and community partnerships.
A people-centered approach to the conservation of gorillas and their habitats in Africa
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals... feeding san diego is on a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community…
Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice.
To end industrial animal agriculture by constructing a just and sustainable food system.
Sheltering homeless animals, facilitating adoption, providing low-cost spay/neuter services, and foster care for dogs and cats.
Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. the organization operates globally. witness' global team designs solutions, provides guidance, and co-develops strategies that enable human rights defenders…
The humane compassionate treatment of all animals.
Animal welfare organization
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Spy Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1870 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1870 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DURABLE CAPITAL FOR SUSTAINABLE OUTCOMES INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds DUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES DBA DUWAMISH TRIBAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PAWS OF WAR INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds The Life You Can Save ↗
- Who funds BALLARD FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I ↗
- Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds TEXAS DIAPER BANK ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds Food Bank of North Alabama Inc ↗
- Who funds Women for Afghan Women Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE SIKH COALITION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Make-A-Wish Foundation of America · Ayudar Foundation · Carl E Kessler Family Foundation · Ronald McDonald House Global · Kids & Clays Foundation · Judith and Stanley Hoffberger Family Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Cmb Foundation · New Futures · The Kathryn J Clark Foundation Inc · The Bernard W and Bernadette Loeb Charitable Foundation · Eric Holby Animal Welfare Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Network for Good funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
- Bridges from School to Work Inc — 33% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc — 23% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Lunch Break Inc — 4% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc — 1% of income from government
- Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Truckers Against Trafficking — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.