Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY

SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY (Utah) receives grants from 82 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,322,374 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($2,182,847). 46 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 58% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$22M
Funders on record
82
Grants received
$8.3M
Net assets
$12M
46/82 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 31%
01What it does

What Summit Land Conservancy does

Mission

Summit Land Conservancy works with utah communities to conserve land and water for the benefit of the people and nature.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Land conservation - see schedule o.

    $16,821,183 spent
    96% of program spending
  2. Stewardship and monitoring - see schedule o.

    $398,770 spent$336,266 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  3. Outreach - see schedule o.

    $381,596 spent
    2% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $17,601,549.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.5M) Expenses 100 ($3.2M) Net assets 100 ($2.2M)2018 Revenue 108 ($4.8M) Expenses 21 ($656k) Net assets 287 ($6.3M)2019 Revenue 361 ($16M) Expenses 650 ($21M) Net assets 78 ($1.7M)2020 Revenue 45 ($2.0M) Expenses 29 ($928k) Net assets 133 ($2.9M)2021 Revenue 100 ($4.4M) Expenses 90 ($2.9M) Net assets 212 ($4.6M)2022 Revenue 251 ($11M) Expenses 331 ($11M) Net assets 228 ($5.0M)2023 Revenue 145 ($6.4M) Expenses 185 ($5.9M) Net assets 261 ($5.7M)2024 Revenue 238 ($11M) Expenses 283 ($9.0M) Net assets 341 ($7.4M)2025 Revenue 505 ($22M) Expenses 570 ($18M) Net assets 552 ($12M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (505)Expenses (570)Net assets (552)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $1.7M to $6.9M (+301%).

$2.5M
$6.3M
$1.7M
$6.9M
$8.6M
$8.8M
$9.1M
$11M
$12M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 44% · 2018 2% · 2019 83% · 2020 20% · 2021 41% · 2022 80% · 2023 60% · 2024 65% · 2025 70%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

83% of SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (87% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 364 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.3M
’17
$4.2M
’18
−$4.7M
’19
$1.1M
’20
$1.6M
’21
$599k
’22
$541k
’23
$1.5M
’24
$4.3M
’25
3.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Cheryl Fox

Chief executive officer

Board chair

Colleen Logan

Board president

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed161316191717192020
Joined·+3+4+7+0+2+2+4+4
No longer listed·61422034
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 20 funders to 32 funders, grant income rose $565k → $1.1M.

19 of 82 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 58% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $633k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Park City Community Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY raised.

From the IRS filings of SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 82 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

71% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY.

26%
largest funder
45%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 41% · 2018 33% · 2019 28% · 2020 19% · 2021 28% · 2022 22% · 2023 49% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

31% of SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

58% of SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $3.5M that is directly attributable, 63% of it comes from funders outside Utah, across 21 states.

NH
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
SD
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
DE
NC
DC
HI
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $4.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 15 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 210 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin19% · above the median
Months of reserve3.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)22% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 210 environment nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Organizations like SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 2%Fundraising 1%

Governance

16
board members
94%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 13 states

MN
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MD
NC
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY?
SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY (Utah) receives grants from 82 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,322,374 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($2,182,847). 46 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 58% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY have?
IRS filings report 82 organizations giving $8,322,374 in grants to SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY, 46 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $2,182,847 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 82 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing