Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER

FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER (California) receives grants from 19 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,390,273 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($696,911). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 78% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$967k
Funders on record
19
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
$9.4M
12/19 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 28%
01What it does

What Foundation for the Performing Arts Center does

Mission

To provide and promote an extraordinary and accessible center for the performing arts that elevates the arts in our community.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Center operations - amounts paid on behalf of san luis obispo performing arts center for program expenses, center operation expenses, interest expense, furnishings and equipment purchases.

    $1,101,763 spentof which $783,248 as grants
    85% of program spending
  2. Arts season - amounts paid to the cal poly arts program to sponsor their performing arts season which provides a broad program of high quality professional touring performances, exhibitions and speaking engagements, while also assisting with educational needs of students through various artist-in-residency activities and off-campus school outreach events.

    $107,500 spent
    8% of program spending
  3. School matinee - amounts to support the school matinee program which gives thousands of local children from all local public, private and home schools the opportunity to attend educational, live arts performances at the pac every school year.

    $90,000 spent
    7% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,299,263.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($594k) Expenses 100 ($793k) Net assets 100 ($5.7M)2018 Revenue 384 ($2.3M) Expenses 111 ($884k) Net assets 130 ($7.4M)2019 Revenue 193 ($1.1M) Expenses 124 ($986k) Net assets 137 ($7.8M)2020 Revenue 146 ($868k) Expenses 133 ($1.1M) Net assets 136 ($7.7M)2021 Revenue 471 ($2.8M) Expenses 123 ($976k) Net assets 168 ($9.5M)2022 Revenue 151 ($900k) Expenses 145 ($1.1M) Net assets 141 ($8.0M)2023 Revenue 300 ($1.8M) Expenses 208 ($1.7M) Net assets 154 ($8.7M)2024 Revenue 118 ($699k) Expenses 200 ($1.6M) Net assets 153 ($8.7M)2025 Revenue 163 ($967k) Expenses 146 ($1.2M) Net assets 165 ($9.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (163)Expenses (146)Net assets (165)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $7.8M to $9.6M (+23%).

$5.7M
$7.4M
$7.8M
$7.8M
$9.6M
$8.0M
$8.9M
$8.8M
$9.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 2% · 2022 5% · 2024 1% · 2025 11%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

75% of FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,547 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$199k
’17
$1.4M
’18
$159k
’19
−$187k
’20
$1.8M
’21
−$248k
’22
$130k
’23
−$891k
’24
−$193k
’25
5.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Kristin Hoover

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed19161715161681211
Joined·+7+2+1+1+4+1+4+4
No longer listed·101304905
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 10 funders, grant income fell $169k → $150k.

6 of 19 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 78% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 50% of grant income and the top three 72%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

81% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER.

50%
largest funder
72%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 74% · 2018 60% · 2019 51% · 2020 45% · 2021 39% · 2022 74% · 2023 47% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

78% of FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $311k that is directly attributable, 70% of it comes from California funders.

ID
MN
WY
CA
NC
DC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER's revenue grew 63% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−20% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,634 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $10k on record.

Federal$10k
grants $10kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$10k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 16%Fundraising 7%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

51%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER?
FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER (California) receives grants from 19 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,390,273 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($696,911). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 78% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER have?
IRS filings report 19 organizations giving $1,390,273 in grants to FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $696,911 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 19 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing