Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
525
Grants FY2024still arriving
41
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$31MFood & Nutrition$19MArts & Culture$4.8MRecreation & Sports$4.0MEducation$3.8MYouth Development$3.5MCommunity Improvement$3.1MHuman Services$2.8MOther$0
02FY2024 · 525 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k429 grants · $721k
  • $10k–50k78 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+10 grants · $4.8M
$1,500
Median grant
41
States reached
$106M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING AMERICA$1,880,000
SESAME WORKSHOP$747,794
THE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC$372,000
KABOOM$315,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS$261,810
THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL$250,000
UCSF BENIOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS FOUNDATION$250,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$250,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$250,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$250,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$249,941
CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC$245,595
SIFMA FOUNDATION FOR INVESTOR EDUCATION FIE INC$100,000
GIVE US THE FLOOR$100,000
OUR MINDS MATTER$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CLOSEGAP INC: $100k → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA INC: $18k → 13%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA INC: $18k → 13%GIVE US THE FLOOR: $100k → 10%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $15k → 11%SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF TEEN SUICIDE INC: $100k → 6%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $15k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $15k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $15k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $15k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $15k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $15k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $15k → 11%CHILDRENS VILLAGE INC: $20k → 9%CHILDRENS VILLAGE INC: $20k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $15k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $15k → 9%UNDER 21COVENANT HOUSE NEW YORK: $25k → 17%UNDER 21COVENANT HOUSE NEW YORK: $20k → 17%UNDER 21COVENANT HOUSE NEW YORK: $20k → 17%UNDER 21COVENANT HOUSE NEW YORK: $20k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $25k → 20%SMART FROM THE START INC: $100k → 16%SAFE HORIZON INC: $100k → 17%SAFE HORIZON INC: $80k → 17%SAFE HORIZON INC: $75k → 17%SAFE HORIZON INC: $50k → 17%SAFE HORIZON INC: $50k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $30k → 17%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK: $25k → 17%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK: $20k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $50k → 17%ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 17%ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $25k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $25k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC (WIN): $100k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC (WIN): $50k → 17%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA: $50k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC (WIN): $50k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOC: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$70M · 1014 repeat orgs$8.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

1014 repeat relationships — 331 still active in FY2024, 683 since wound down; 123 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1014
822

Total granted

$70M
$6.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+25%

Still filing today

78%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16M · revenue +84%
  • TJ
    THE JED FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2023 · $10M · revenue +182% · 40% of their budget
  • CM
    CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FELIX PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • A
    ARPAN
    one grant, 2021 · $292k
  • TF
    THE FOOD TRAIN
    one grant, 2021 · $239k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Compass Charter School

Compass charter school is a safe and nurturing educational environment that honors the individuality of each learner. by engaging in a process of inquiry, our graduates will be equipped with the necessary skills to lead fulfilling personal…

Education
12
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership With Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aspiring Kindness Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Domestic Violence ServicesCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Development ServicesSchool District FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentPolicy Research and AdvocacySchool Parent OrganizationsElementary Literacy TutoringEnvironmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersAnimal Rescue and ShelterDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Mentoring ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community College Foundatio…Immigrant Worker SupportMilitary Veterans SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Community Food PantriesFaith-Based Social ServicesDance Arts OrganizationsJewish Community Organizati…Christian Youth CampsPublic Library OperationsEquine Therapy ProgramsAffordable Housing Construc…United Way AffiliatesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Senior Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsFood Banks and PantriesLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%45%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%18/1,793
the rest of the field
13%
240,378/1,817,772

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1566 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1566 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
405
Early backer (in before they grew)
1508/1566
Grantees still filing
1084/1566
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE JED FOUNDATION — $10,390,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATIONCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $4,049,098 · HealthCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INCNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $3,485,000 · HealthNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC+23 more — $5,039,810 · Health+23 moreFeeding America — $16,285,302 · Food & NutritionFeeding America+8 more — $929,000 · Food & Nutrition+8 moreMORGAN STANLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $2,985,000 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY CHILDREN'…LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION — $622,987 · OtherSIFMA FOUNDATION FOR INVESTOR EDUCATION (FIE) INC — $800,000 · Other+109 more — $11,281,041 · Other+109 moreTHE STEPHEN C ROSE LEGACY FOUNDATION — $2,578,200 · Human ServicesSAFE HORIZON INC — $355,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INC — $250,000 · Human Services+29 more — $2,484,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN — $2,516,260 · Arts & CultureSESAME WORKSHOP — $747,794 · Arts & CultureONLY MAKE BELIEVE INC — $140,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more — $545,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC — $2,823,140 · Community ImprovementFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $275,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $153,500 · Community ImprovementKABOOM INC — $2,652,000 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR FUND — $160,000 · Recreation & SportsPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC — $125,000 · Recreation & Sports+3 more — $254,500 · Recreation & Sports
Health$22,963,908Food & Nutrition$17,214,302Other$15,689,028Human Services$5,667,200Arts & Culture$3,949,054Community Improvement$3,251,640Recreation & Sports$3,191,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFeeding America — $16,285,302 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $10,390,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $4,049,098 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $3,485,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC — $2,823,140 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetKABOOM INC — $2,652,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetTHE STEPHEN C ROSE LEGACY FOUNDATION — $2,578,200 over 4y, 74% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN — $2,516,260 over 3y, 24% of budgetSIFMA FOUNDATION FOR INVESTOR EDUCATION (FIE) INC — $800,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP — $747,794 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC — $590,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $560,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $501,441 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN — $500,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC — $355,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital — $350,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund — $300,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $275,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS — $261,810 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAdvocates for Children of New York — $250,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $245,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $240,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS — $240,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC — $240,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $230,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN — $225,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC — $225,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $200,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetREAD AHEAD INC — $200,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetTHE KING'S TRUST USA INC — $190,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $190,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetThe Global FoodBanking Network — $180,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC — $160,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetUNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC — $160,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $160,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWICH HOUSE INC — $160,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $150,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc — $145,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $145,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetONLY MAKE BELIEVE INC — $140,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $140,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $136,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $132,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds KABOOM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STEPHEN C ROSE LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN ↗
  • Who funds SIFMA FOUNDATION FOR INVESTOR EDUCATION (FIE) INC ↗
  • Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗
  • Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Health Fund ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
  • Who funds LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Advocates for Children of New York ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds READ AHEAD INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Founda…The Hyde and Watson F…Youth Improving Non-P…Pinkerton FoundationPwc Foundation IncCredit Suisse America…The Blackstone Charit…Robin Hood FoundationLily Auchincloss Foun…Smbc Global Foundatio…The Achelis & Bodman …Mother Cabrini Health…
Morgan Stanley FoundationNY191.2× affinity172 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Youth Improving Non-Profits for Children · Pinkerton Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · The Blackstone Charitable Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Smbc Global Foundation Inc · The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation — 49% of income from government
  • Family & Children's Agency Inc — 47% of income from government
  • Horizons Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Boys & Girls Club Inc — 30% of income from government
  • University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
  • Cumacecho Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Strategies for Youth — 21% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Smart From the Start Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of the Chesapeake Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Waterfront Partnership of Baltimore Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital — 0% of income from government
  • The Cushman School Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines