Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

Intermountain Therapy Animals

Intermountain Therapy Animals (Utah) receives grants from 43 organizations whose IRS filings report $964,850 to it, the largest being CROSS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ATTN JOHN R CLARK ($155,000). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$510k
Funders on record
43
Grants received
$965k
Net assets
$180k
24/43 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 25%
01What it does

What Intermountain Therapy Animals does

Mission

Enhancing quality of life through the human-animal bond.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Intermountain Therapy Animals (ITA) -This Program Service includes all Activities for the local ITA operations. First, volunteer recruiting, screen, workshop training, team testing, mentoring, placement and monitoring of therapy team volunteers who provide the essential service of the organization. The organizations 300 plus team work in more than 170 healthcare and educational facilies. Second, community and professional education, including about 100 presentations each year to therapists, physicians, professional association conferences, community organications like Rotary and Eagles, and school classrooms to demostrate what the organization does and educate others as to the potential benefits.

    $228,989 spent$451,488 earned by the program
    54% of program spending
  2. Reading education assistance dogs (R.E.A.D.) -This program has grown way beyond the organizations local service territory. The organization has trained and registered almost 7,500 volunteer therapy teams in all 50 states and 29 additional countries to provide reading support programs, utilizing therapy animals as reading companions, in school, libraries and other settings. The organization service includes training, facilitating and supporting all these teams around the country and the world.

    $21,348 spent$28,616 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  3. Associates - because the organization has been very successful in its work and has standards that are now recognized around the country, the organization has had more than a dozen colleague therapy groups who have asked to make use of its training and testing protocols. The organization currently has 21 such groups in 17 other states. While supporting them does not take as much time as supporting its own teams, the organization does provide training manuals, travel to some locations to conduct workshops and team screenings, and otherwise provide facilitation and customer support to these groups

    $20,038 spent$40,274 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  4. Other Program Services including: Giving Tuesday, Family Dog, Paws Passions,Etc.

    $155,117 spent$5,153 earned by the program
    36% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $425,492.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($514k) Expenses 100 ($574k) Net assets 100 ($20k)2020 Revenue 104 ($534k) Expenses 86 ($494k) Net assets 393 ($78k)2021 Revenue 86 ($443k) Expenses 70 ($403k) Net assets 853 ($169k)2022 Revenue 86 ($441k) Expenses 63 ($362k) Net assets 877 ($174k)2023 Revenue 109 ($559k) Expenses 92 ($529k) Net assets 1033 ($205k)2024 Revenue 105 ($542k) Expenses 96 ($549k) Net assets 998 ($198k)2025 Revenue 99 ($510k) Expenses 92 ($529k) Net assets 910 ($180k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (99)Expenses (92)Net assets (910)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $179k to $345k (+93%).

$108k
$179k
$345k
$245k
$283k
$270k
$347k
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

92% of Intermountain Therapy Animals’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

−$60k
’19
$40k
’20
$40k
’21
$79k
’22
$30k
’23
−$7k
’24
−$19k
’25
5.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Jane Lee Fischer

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

2019202020212022202320242025
Listed67999911
Joined·+1+3+0+0+0+5
No longer listed·010003
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 11 funders to 15 funders, grant income rose $89k → $141k.

8 of 43 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Intermountain Therapy Animals’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 43 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Intermountain Therapy Animals has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 16% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

33% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Intermountain Therapy Animals.

16%
largest funder
41%
top three
~12
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 23% · 2018 35% · 2019 22% · 2020 37% · 2021 20% · 2022 20% · 2023 17% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

54% of Intermountain Therapy Animals's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

71% of Intermountain Therapy Animals's grant income comes from Utah funders.

MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
OH
PA
CT
UT
MO
DE
AZ
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $264k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Intermountain Therapy Animals is better cushioned than half of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−4% · below the median
Months of reserve5.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Intermountain Therapy Animals

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 8%Fundraising 12%

Governance

9
board members
89%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Intermountain Therapy Animals: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Intermountain Therapy Animals?
Intermountain Therapy Animals (Utah) receives grants from 43 organizations whose IRS filings report $964,850 to it, the largest being CROSS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ATTN JOHN R CLARK ($155,000). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Intermountain Therapy Animals have?
IRS filings report 43 organizations giving $964,850 in grants to Intermountain Therapy Animals, 24 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Intermountain Therapy Animals?
CROSS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ATTN JOHN R CLARK is the largest funder on record, with $155,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Intermountain Therapy Animals find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Intermountain Therapy Animals →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 43 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing