Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

ASCENCIA

ASCENCIA (California) receives grants from 49 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,849,212 to it, the largest being PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - SO CALIFORNIA ($300,500). 31 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$6.0M
Funders on record
49
Grants received
$3.8M
Net assets
$2.9M
31/49 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What Ascencia does

Mission

To lift people of out homelessness, one person, one family at a time.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The Organization operates the following programs: The Access Center serves as the Coordinated Entry System (CES) for all clients in the Glendale Continuum of Care by providing standardized assessment of all clients that prioritizes the most vulnerable for housing placement. Services include street outreach, comprehensive screening and assessment of client needs, and case management with specializations in mental health, substance use disorders, housing location, employment, financial literacy, occupational therapy, tele-psychiatry, psychotherapy, art therapy for children, and veterans services. Services based at the Access Center are client-centered and use a trauma-informed approach to support client use of services. The Organizations Outreach Teams canvas streets to offer services to people experiencing homelessness, respond to calls from the community to help people experiencing homelessness, and provide essential transportation to connect clients to needed services. The Access Center case management staff conducts a thorough review of each persons social, economic and health needs and tailors a plan for continuing services at the Organization or makes a responsible referral to…

    $5,834,445 spent$122,908 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $5,834,445.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.7M) Expenses 100 ($3.0M) Net assets 100 ($2.6M)2018 Revenue 120 ($3.3M) Expenses 115 ($3.5M) Net assets 93 ($2.4M)2019 Revenue 124 ($3.4M) Expenses 113 ($3.4M) Net assets 92 ($2.4M)2020 Revenue 135 ($3.7M) Expenses 128 ($3.8M) Net assets 86 ($2.2M)2021 Revenue 226 ($6.2M) Expenses 145 ($4.4M) Net assets 155 ($4.0M)2022 Revenue 192 ($5.3M) Expenses 154 ($4.7M) Net assets 179 ($4.6M)2023 Revenue 202 ($5.5M) Expenses 193 ($5.8M) Net assets 166 ($4.3M)2024 Revenue 221 ($6.0M) Expenses 216 ($6.5M) Net assets 148 ($3.8M)2025 Revenue 220 ($6.0M) Expenses 229 ($6.9M) Net assets 113 ($2.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (220)Expenses (229)Net assets (113)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $5.7M to $5.1M (−11%).

$5.5M
$5.3M
$5.4M
$5.6M
$5.8M
$6.4M
$6.3M
$5.7M
$5.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 68% · 2018 69% · 2019 68% · 2020 76% · 2021 70% · 2022 74% · 2023 76% · 2024 84% · 2025 80%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of ASCENCIA’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (39% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,214 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$285k
’17
−$188k
’18
−$24k
’19
−$155k
’20
$1.8M
’21
$603k
’22
−$320k
’23
−$486k
’24
−$903k
’25
0.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed202521212021262522
Joined·+11+2+6+4+4+9+5+3
No longer listed·66653466
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 15 funders to 18 funders, grant income rose $325k → $448k.

8 of 49 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ASCENCIA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 49 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ASCENCIA has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 8% of grant income, and it takes 9 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 9 funders to its left

63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ASCENCIA.

8%
largest funder
22%
top three
~23
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 32% · 2018 37% · 2019 28% · 2020 33% · 2021 38% · 2022 21% · 2023 24% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of ASCENCIA's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

77% of ASCENCIA's grant income comes from California funders.

WA
NY
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
AZ
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $676k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ASCENCIA has grown faster than half of the 2,196 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−15% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,196 housing & shelter nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like ASCENCIA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 11%Fundraising 5%

Governance

22
board members
95%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ASCENCIA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ASCENCIA?
ASCENCIA (California) receives grants from 49 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,849,212 to it, the largest being PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - SO CALIFORNIA ($300,500). 31 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ASCENCIA have?
IRS filings report 49 organizations giving $3,849,212 in grants to ASCENCIA, 31 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ASCENCIA?
PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - SO CALIFORNIA is the largest funder on record, with $300,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ASCENCIA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Ascencia →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 49 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing