Loading…
Loading…
South Carolina · Nonprofit
CHARLESTON MEN'S CHORUS INC (South Carolina) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $56,000 in grants to it, the largest being Gary W Dietrich Family Foundation ($18,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHARLESTON MEN'S CHORUS INC has grown faster than half of the 14,240 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,240 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
$3k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $4k and 2 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of CHARLESTON MEN'S CHORUS INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
CHARLESTON MEN'S CHORUS INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 32% of grant income and the top three 77%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 57% · 2018 50% · 2019 29% · 2020 44% · 2021 38% · 2022 40% · 2023 26% · 2024 56% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
CHARLESTON MEN'S CHORUS INC is locally rooted: 64% of its grant income comes from South Carolina funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 155 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
89%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing