· Public charity
Youth Improving Non-Profits for Children
Youth, improving non-profits for children (d/b/a "youth inc") strengthens youth-serving nonprofits by equipping them with the tools, resources, and strategies to overcome barriers, achieve sustainable growth, and expand their impact.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $166,875 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $203,875 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $158k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEAM CENTER INC | $28,375 |
| YOU GOTTA BELIEVE | $25,000 |
| YOUNG NEW YORKERS INC | $20,000 |
| BLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC | $18,500 |
| DRAMA CLUB INC | $13,500 |
| YOUTH REPRESENT INC | $13,500 |
| ADOPTIVE AND FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK | $13,500 |
| VIBE THEATER EXPERIENCE | $13,500 |
| DIRECTIONS FOR OUR YOUTH | $12,000 |
| TEACHERS AND WRITERS COLLABORATIVE INC | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
79 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 72 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +89%
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC3× · 2017–2019 · $552k · revenue +2%
- BCBEAM CENTER INC5× · 2018–2025 · $459k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- TWTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +304%
- ADATLAS DIY CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $134k
- TPThe Parris Foundation Incone grant, 2017 · $109k · revenue +9% · 30% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
School in the square ("s2") engages, educates and empowers adolescents to respond mindfully and creatively to life's opportunities and challenges. s2 is a place where students, families and educators are seen, heard, and inspired and where…
From classrooms to careers, studio in a school expands access to visual arts education and professions in the arts by partnering with practicing artists, schools, and cultural institutions.
Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…
The purpose of the organization is to build an enriching educational setting for under-served brooklyn youth, using athletics as a vehicle to inspire them to fulfill their academic, physical, and personal potential. bkysc is driven by an…
To bridge the gap between the current school curriculum and the immediate need for schools to prepare students for STEM skills and for jobs that do not yet exist.
Reel works mentors, inspires and empowers underserved nyc youth to share their stories through filmmaking, creating a springboard to successful careers in media and beyond.
Empower the youth of new york city through basketball, providing them with academic enrichment, career development, and a strong sense of community to unlock their full potential
We amplify youth and community power by inspiring, guiding, and advocating for youth to determine their college, career, and leadership futures.
Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…
Students are prepared to meet the needs of an ever changing technological and global society. we use the latest technology in our classrooms as an integral part of its curriculum approach. this approach is based on the latest research in…
We develop adventurers. (see schedule o)creative collaborators and intellectual risk takers who are inspired to think critically and seek answers. we create passionate communicators actively connected to their community and the world. we…
Arete operates afterschool and summer programs in new york city public schools
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roads to Success Inc and the most unlike its peers is Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
101 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 101 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds BEAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
- Who funds HIGHBRIDGE VOICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHESS-IN-THE-SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA SCORES ↗
- Who funds PLAY RUGBY INC ↗
- Who funds TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DRAMA CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds GIVING ALTERNATIVE LEARNERS UPLIFTING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BEHIND THE BOOK INC ↗
- Who funds VIBE THEATER EXPERIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds PARENTCHILD INC ↗
- Who funds I CHALLENGE MYSELF INC ↗
- Who funds HARLEM RBI INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds ADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds 826NYC Inc ↗
- Who funds Opening Act Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRL BE HEARD INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ATLAS DIY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH REPRESENT INC ↗
- Who funds The Parris Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds READING TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds POWERPLAY NYC INC ↗
- Who funds FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKAWAY WATERFRONT ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY-WORD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ACTION PROGRAMS AND HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds STEM FROM DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds TRAILBLAZER CAMPS INC ↗
- Who funds GenYOUTH Incorporated ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pinkerton Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · American Express Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · Sparkyouth NYC Inc · William T Grant Foundation Inc · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Youth Improving Non-Profits for Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hands in for Youth Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.