How much did YOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN grant in FY2024?

Education$2.0MHealth$1.6MArts & Culture$1.5MRecreation & Sports$1.1MYouth Development$927kHuman Services$658kPhilanthropy$505kCrime & Legal$407kEnvironment$97kOther$3.1M

02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k7 grants · $172k
$50k–250k1 grant · $60k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

ARTS IGNITE$60,000
DRAMA CLUB INC$32,500
LEARNING THROUGH AN EXPANDED ARTS PROGRAM$27,000
FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC$27,000
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK$25,000
BLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC$25,000
BEHIND THE BOOK$25,000
BROOKLYN YOUTH CHORUS ACADEMY INC$10,000
PARENTCHILD INC$8,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $658k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$11M · 80 repeat orgs$859k to everyone else

80 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 73 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$11M

$824k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

+30%

Still filing today

94%

90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MS
Memorial Sloan-Kettering
3× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +89%
RM
Ronald McDonald House of NY
3× · 2017–2019 · $552k · revenue +2%
BC
Beam Center Inc
4× · 2018–2022 · $431k · revenue +107%

Funded once

TW
Tiger Woods Foundationgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +146%
AD
Atlas DIY Corporation
one grant, 2017 · $134k
PF
Parris Foundation Incgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $109k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Science Academies of New York

The Schools seek to graduate students who can think critically and creatively.

—

Young Audiences New York Inc

Using art, as a catalyst for exploring creativity and advancing equity among communities in nyc.

Arts & Culture

Stem Kids Nyc

STEM Kids NYC bridges the gap between the current school curriculum and the immediate need for schools to prepare students for STEM skills and for jobs that do not exist. We teach PreK-12 students in computer science, engineering, science,…

Education

Inspiring Minds of New York City Inc

To engage inspire and empower youth to reach their full potential through education and exposure to life changing experiences.

Youth Development

Bct Brooklyn Children's Theatre Inc

Brooklyn children's theatre empowers youth through musical theatre, reimagining arts education by centering the whole child and prioritizing belonging and equity.

Arts & Culture

Advocates for Children of New York

To ensure a high-quality education for new york students who face barriers to academic success, focusing on students from low-income backgrounds.

Crime & Legal

Brooklyn Youth Sports Club Inc

Bkysc assist brooklyn youth in their pursuit of college enrollment using basketball as the hook for academic engagement and character development by combining intensive basketball programming and rigorous academic support. bkysc builds an…

Recreation & Sports

Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage.

Education

Manhattan Youth Recreation and Resources

Manhattan youth's mission is to provide the highest quality academic, recreation and cultural activities to individuals and families who live and work in lower manhattan, regardless of their income.

Youth Development

Nyc Kids Rise Inc

Nyc kids rise, inc. is a nonprofit organization working to expand economic opportunityand equity by providing families, schools, and communities with a way to work together to save for their children's education. building on the dreams and…

Youth Development

Innovation Charter High School

Public charter high school in new york city that promotes leadership through innovation.

Education

International School of Brooklyn

We develop adventurers. (see schedule o)

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community-Word Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chess-in-the-Schools Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/102

the rest of the field

10%

3,930/40,133

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

97 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

95/97

Grantees still filing

70/97

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,122,498Education$2,012,085Health$1,561,003Arts & Culture$1,463,876Recreation & Sports$1,131,009Youth Development$927,069Human Services$657,567

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ85.7× affinity46 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · American Express Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · Sparkyouth NYC Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation YOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Drama Club Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 300836513 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Drama Club Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 24% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Youth Improving Non-Profits for Children?

Find your warmest path to Youth Improving Non-Profits for Children through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

YOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

97 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Youth Improving Non-Profits for Children?

More from the funding graph

YOUTH IMPROVING NON-PROFITS FOR CHILDREN

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

97 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Youth Improving Non-Profits for Children?

More from the funding graph