· Private foundation
Smbc Global Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k34 grants · $121k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $277k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $346k
- $250k+2 grants · $558k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM | $300,000 |
| AMERICA'S CHARITIES | $257,889 |
| NEW YORK CARES | $100,000 |
| THE RESOURCE FOUNDATION | $96,020 |
| JAPAN SOCIETY INC | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $50,000 |
| EARTH DAY NETWORK INC | $50,000 |
| FREDERICK DOUGLASS ACADEMY | $35,000 |
| COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL - CENTER ON JAPANESE ECONOMY AND BUSINESS | $35,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW YORK | $31,435 |
| JAPANESE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE (JEI) | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $23,555 |
| IUC (INTER-UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR JAPANESE STUDIES) - STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION | $17,815 |
| CAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION - CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP | $16,240 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
113 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 86 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $441k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAMERICA'S CHARITIES3× · 2022–2024 · $444k · revenue +43%
- CICATALYST INC6× · 2017–2023 · $130k · revenue +22%
- JDJAPAN DAY INC5× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- ACAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $225k · revenue +53%
- CSCHANGE SUMMER INCone grant, 2023 · $175k · revenue +10%
- OBOUTWARD BOUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $175k · revenue +178%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is Parent Teacher Association of Ps 78Q Robert. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
362 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 362 of the 491 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CARES INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHANGE SUMMER INC ↗
- Who funds OUTWARD BOUND INC ↗
- Who funds CATALYST INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JAPAN DAY INC ↗
- Who funds HELLENIC INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON-MADISON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds EARTH DAY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PROGRAM ON INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds JAPAN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Table For Two USA ↗
- Who funds THE JAPANESE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds ASPIRA OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION GRATITUDE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Soros Fund Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Smbc Global Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- Jewish Family Service of Stamford Inc — 2% of income from government
- Branch Brook Park Alliance Inc — 2% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Kars 4 Kids Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Smbc Global Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Smbc Global Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.