· Public charity
Globalgiving Foundation Inc
To transform aid and philanthropy to accelerate community-led change.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 420 grants below total $20,912,671 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $97,318,371 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $76,405,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k130 grants · $916k
- $10k–50k204 grants · $4.2M
- $50k–250k72 grants · $7.0M
- $250k+14 grants · $8.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SITARE FOUNDATION | $4,043,628 |
| REBUILDING ALLIANCE | $524,739 |
| NOVA UKRAINE | $500,090 |
| THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE | $456,730 |
| RESOLUTION PROJECT INC | $405,232 |
| HIGH ATLAS FOUNDATION | $389,512 |
| WATSON | $350,000 |
| LEADERSHIP INITIATIVES | $334,611 |
| CENTER FOR CIVIL SOCIETY AND DEMOCRACY IN SYRIA | $325,462 |
| THE HALO TRUST | $312,772 |
| MADRE AN INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S HUMAN RIGHTS ORG | $312,536 |
| GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN | $254,360 |
| FRIENDS OF FORGE | $252,000 |
| RAZOM INC | $251,140 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC | $239,683 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $71M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: FUNDS RAISED BY GLOBALGIVING AND DISBURSED TO MEET DONOR EXPECTATIONS
Stated purpose: FUNDS RAISED BY GLOBALGIVING AND DISBURSED TO MEET DONOR EXPECTATIONS
Stated purpose: FUNDS RAISED BY GLOBALGIVING AND DISBURSED TO MEET DONOR EXPECTATIONS
Stated purpose: FUNDS RAISED BY GLOBALGIVING AND DISBURSED TO MEET DONOR EXPECTATIONS
Stated purpose: FUNDS RAISED BY GLOBALGIVING AND DISBURSED TO MEET DONOR EXPECTATIONS
Stated purpose: FUNDS RAISED BY GLOBALGIVING AND DISBURSED TO MEET DONOR EXPECTATIONS
Stated purpose: FUNDS RAISED BY GLOBALGIVING AND DISBURSED TO MEET DONOR EXPECTATIONS
Stated purpose: FUNDS RAISED BY GLOBALGIVING AND DISBURSED TO MEET DONOR EXPECTATIONS
Stated purpose: FUNDS RAISED BY GLOBALGIVING AND DISBURSED TO MEET DONOR EXPECTATIONS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
850 repeat relationships — 330 still active in FY2024, 520 since wound down; 80 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE REBUILDING ALLIANCE8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue ×12 · 52% of their budget
- GFGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN6× · 2018–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +26%
- PDPROGRAMA DE EDUCACION COMUNAL DE ENTREGA Y SERVICIO INC7× · 2017–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +17%
Funded once
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $519k · revenue +41%- OFONEPULSE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $400k · revenue -100%
- TGTHE GATHERING FOR JUSTICE INCone grant, 2022 · $394k · revenue -41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…
Groundswell International strenghtens communities to build healthy farming and food systems from the ground up.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.
Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…
The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…
Good neighbors usa is an international humanitarian and development organization committed to build a global community where people live together in health, harmony, and dignity.
Green empowerment works with local partners around the world to strengthen communities by delivering renewable energy and safe water.
The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.
Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…
Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Beyond Borders and the most unlike its peers is Arck. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1440 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1440 of the 1,684 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SITARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
- Who funds THE REBUILDING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds PROGRAMA DE EDUCACION COMUNAL DE ENTREGA Y SERVICIO INC ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE COMMON GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds RESCUING LEFTOVER CUISINE INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH ATLAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FILANTROPIA PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds CREATING HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds INTEGRAL HEART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds BE THE BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds THE HALO TRUST (USA) INC ↗
- Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
- Who funds THE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SEVA MANDIR INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Watson Institute ↗
- Who funds CORPORACION LA FONDITA DE JESUS ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds LA MARANA CORP ↗
- Who funds PUERTO RICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds US ASSOCIATION FOR INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RECREATION TEAMBUILDING IMPACTING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TALLER SALUD INC ↗
- Who funds Develop Africa ↗
- Who funds WE ARE ALL HUMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BakerRipley ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Together Women Rise · Center for Disaster Philanthropy Inc · One Days Wages · Puerto Rico Community Foundation Inc · Circle of Sisterhood Foundation Inc · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc · Girls Rights Project · Foundation for Puerto Rico Inc · Kathryn B McQuade Foundation · Imago Dei Fund · Ploughshares Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Globalgiving Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Global Diversity Foundation Inc — 100% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Homeless and Hunger Coalition of Northwest Florida Inc — 7% of income from government
- Warrior Canine Connection Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.