California · Nonprofit
CLINICA VERDE
CLINICA VERDE (California) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $388,326 to it, the largest being IZUMI FOUNDATION ($137,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2022
- $48k
- Funders on record
- 16
- Grants received
- $388k
- Net assets
- $0
What Clinica Verde does
Mission
To build and maintain environmentally sustainable health clinics to meet the needs of the medically underserved in latin america (nicaragua).
As stated on its FY2022 Form 990.
Programs
On its FY2022 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.
Clinica Verde ceased operations in march 2022 due to volatile nicaraguan government. Assets were transferred to other not for profit organizations or will be seized by the nicaraguan government. See schedule n for listing of assets transferred or disposed.
Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).
Create a replicable model for the construction of green environmentally sustainable medical clinics in latin america (nicaragua) and improve maternal and infant healthcare in latin america (nicaragua).
$79,375 spent46% of program spendingA prenatal nutrition program - using interactive lessons to deliver a 10-week socio-behavioral change curriculum, the organization teaches pregnant mothers about the stages of fetal development, ways to care for their child in the womb, and nutrition during the antenatal and postnatal periods and during the first five years of their children's lives, while providing support and space to build a community of new mothers who support each other. All mothers enrolled in the program and their babies are followed after conception with regular check-ups and training provided both in-community and at Clinica Verde.
$92,476 spent$47,543 earned by the program54% of program spending
The 2 programs described on its FY2022 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $171,851.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $994k to $0 (−100%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Board chair
Susan Dix Lyons
Chair
As listed on its FY2022 Form 990.
The chief executive listed changed between the FY2019 and FY2020 filings.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $74k → $33.
8 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 44% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CLINICA VERDE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CLINICA VERDE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 35% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
95% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CLINICA VERDE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 68% · 2018 69% · 2019 63% · 2020 59% · 2021 34% · 2022 98% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
8% of CLINICA VERDE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 38% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
CLINICA VERDE draws 94% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 8 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $170k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Organizations like CLINICA VERDE
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
82% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
85%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CLINICA VERDE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CLINICA VERDE?
- CLINICA VERDE (California) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $388,326 to it, the largest being IZUMI FOUNDATION ($137,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CLINICA VERDE have?
- IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $388,326 in grants to CLINICA VERDE, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CLINICA VERDE?
- IZUMI FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $137,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CLINICA VERDE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Clinica Verde →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2017–2022), and the filings of 16 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing