Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

Fruit Tree Planting Foundation

Fruit Tree Planting Foundation (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $733,100 to it, the largest being NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ($330,737). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$230k
Funders on record
21
Grants received
$733k
Net assets
$2.6M
11/21 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 33%
01What it does

What Fruit Tree Planting Foundation does

Mission

To encourage the planting of 18 billion edible fruit trees under organic, humane standards. To benefit the environment, human health, and animal welfare by strategically planting fruit and nut tree orchards where they will best serve communities for decades to follow. This includes planting any edible, medicinal, or environmentally beneficial trees or plants.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. FRUIT RELIEF PROGRAM FTPFs Fruit Relief program involves strategically planting fruit trees where the harvest will most benefit impoverished communitiesin low-income neighborhoods and international hunger relief sitesand distributing fruit trees directly to families in need to provide a source of nutrition in their backyards for decades to follow. Educational programs on fruit tree care are also provided at various workshops and distribution events. As a result of such orchard donations, life-saving sustenance is provided and local volunteers, many of whom are in difficult situations themselves, are empowered to take action for their environment.

    $145,664 spent
    58% of program spending
  2. FRUITFUL COMMUNITIES This program involves working with community groups, nonprofits such as food banks, and public parks across the country to create community orchards, which provide a long-term source of nutrition for the neighborhood.

    $64,556 spent
    26% of program spending
  3. FRUIT TREE 101 PROGRAM FTPFs Fruit Tree 101 program donates and plants fruit tree orchards at public schools of all levels, around the world, to provide generations of students and teachers with healthy nutrition options and environmental education opportunities. Students and teachers participate in plantings with FTPF administering a curriculum focused on sustainability and healthy nutrition, thereby inspiring the next generation of environmental stewards. Many schools use the orchards as outdoor classrooms to teach concepts in botany and ecology. One school district official wrote that they expect the orchards to last for decades, giving our students the opportunity to receive environmental education that would not otherwise be available to them. The orchards also provide a source of produce for improved nutrition in school lunch programs.

    $20,054 spent
    8% of program spending
  4. TREES FOR TRIBESFTPFs Trees for Tribes program provides fruit and nut tree orchards to communities on Native American reservations. The trees and harvest provide environmental benefits and healthy sustenance to combat obesity and diabetes. Orchards last for generations and are donated strictly for the benefit of the tribe.

    $12,904 spent
    5% of program spending
  5. AFTERCARE FTPF serves as an ongoing resource for orchard recipients by providing horticultural expertise, guidance, and follow-up visits and consultation. This includes workshops and seminars on advanced topics such as pruning and organic, animal- and eco-friendly tree maintenance. FTPF works with orchard caretakers throughout the year to ensure vibrant, thriving fruit trees.

    $3,180 spent
    1% of program spending
  6. CONSERVATION & NURSERIES In order to conserve valuable land resources on the planet and create fruit tree forests and tree farms for the benefit of communities, FTPF preserves lands it has acquired and the fruit trees within them. At its Na Piko property, FTPF is setting up a unique, eco-friendly demonstration site to inspire visitors and support its regional programs.

    $3,174 spent
    1% of program spending
  7. ROOTS OF RECOVERY This program involves planting fruit trees at facilities where the harvest will help patients and at-risk residentsplaces such as hospitals, healing centers, drug rehabilitation facilities, and prisons. Studies show that exposure to nature and plants can reduce stress within minutes, and this program seeks to use horticultural therapy to advance healing and recovery.

    $2,449 spent
    1% of program spending
  8. OUTREACH To meet its goal of planting and inspiring the planting of fruit trees for the benefit of the environment and all its inhabitants, FTPF serves as a valuable resource to members of the publicencouraging them to plant and providing helpful resources, including seeds, written materials including its Home Orchard Handbook, direct communication, and workshops and seminars.

    $1,034 spent
    0% of program spending
  9. ORCHARDS FOR ANIMALS FTPFs Orchards for Animals program improves lives for rescued animals on sanctuaries by providing fruit trees for shade, shelter, enrichment, and healthy diets. When the trees mature, animals are able to enjoy delicious fruits and foraging opportunities. During times of extreme heat or precipitation, animals can seek shade and shelter under the trees without being away from their food source. Fruit trees allow for the most natural diet available to animals, plucked fresh off the tree with no chemicals or pesticides.

  10. REFORESTATION Forests are home to countless fauna and flora and serve a critical role in the planets health and well-being. Planting trees to expand existing forests or create new ones is a simple and direct way to improve ecosystems and promote clean air, water, and soil. FTPF plants region-appropriate trees in partnership with local authorities to increase biodiversity and tree canopy in forests across the world.

The 10 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $253,015.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($220k) Expenses 100 ($235k) Net assets 100 ($1.7M)2018 Revenue 165 ($362k) Expenses 126 ($296k) Net assets 104 ($1.8M)2019 Revenue 213 ($467k) Expenses 104 ($245k) Net assets 117 ($2.0M)2020 Revenue 228 ($500k) Expenses 82 ($192k) Net assets 135 ($2.3M)2021 Revenue 213 ($469k) Expenses 103 ($242k) Net assets 144 ($2.5M)2022 Revenue 162 ($356k) Expenses 106 ($248k) Net assets 151 ($2.6M)2023 Revenue 149 ($326k) Expenses 126 ($296k) Net assets 153 ($2.6M)2024 Revenue 105 ($230k) Expenses 116 ($272k) Net assets 150 ($2.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (105)Expenses (116)Net assets (150)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $2.0M to $2.3M (+15%).

$1.7M
$1.8M
$2.0M
$2.3M
$2.5M
$2.6M
$2.6M
$2.6M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 3% · 2021 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

70% of Fruit Tree Planting Foundation’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,547 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$15k
’17
$66k
’18
$222k
’19
$308k
’20
$227k
’21
$109k
’22
$30k
’23
−$42k
’24
61
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed33333333
Joined·+0+0+0+0+1+0+0
No longer listed·0000100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $44k → $107k.

4 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Fruit Tree Planting Foundation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 20 of 21 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Fruit Tree Planting Foundation leans on a few funders — its largest provides 45% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

74% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Fruit Tree Planting Foundation.

45%
largest funder
75%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 53% · 2018 77% · 2019 50% · 2020 33% · 2021 49% · 2022 55% · 2023 23% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

20% of Fruit Tree Planting Foundation's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 52% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Fruit Tree Planting Foundation draws 98% of its grant income from funders outside Pennsylvania, across 11 states in all.

MN
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
NE
DC
HI
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $61k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Fruit Tree Planting Foundation holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 17,936 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−18% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve61.4mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,936 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like Fruit Tree Planting Foundation

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

93% of spending goes to programs.

Program 93%Management 4%Fundraising 3%

Governance

3
board members
67%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

86%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Fruit Tree Planting Foundation: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Fruit Tree Planting Foundation?
Fruit Tree Planting Foundation (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $733,100 to it, the largest being NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ($330,737). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Fruit Tree Planting Foundation have?
IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $733,100 in grants to Fruit Tree Planting Foundation, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Fruit Tree Planting Foundation?
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $330,737 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Fruit Tree Planting Foundation find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Fruit Tree Planting →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing