Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS

PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS (Texas) receives grants from 141 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,396,100 to it, the largest being MARGARET A CARGILL FOUNDATION ($2,300,000). 61 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$27M
Funders on record
141
Grants received
$8.4M
Net assets
$36M
61/141 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Partnership With Native Americans does

Mission

Serving immediate needs, supporting long-term solutions for strong, self-sufficient native american communities. We address nutrition, health, education, emergency services, holiday support, and animal welfare. To learn more, see schedule o and www.nativepartnership.org.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Health: purpose of the program: to support preventative care and health education initiatives of reservation programs serving tribal citizens, and to help them motivate involvement in healthy lifestyles and community service situation: a legacy of healthcare disparities and high disease rates persists across native america. For instance, native adults are nearly 300% more likely to have diabetes and 50% more likely to have obesity than non-hispanic whites. Yet medical care is still inadequate and limited to the indian health service (I.h.s.). There are only 500 of these federally run I.h.s. Clinics to serve 574 recognized tribes (less than 1 per reservation), and transportation for the long trek to access these facilities is an issue for many residents. Despite cares act funding, I.h.s. Remains (continued on schedule o)

    $7,784,046 spentof which $5,160,056 as grants
    51% of program spending
  2. Emergency services: purpose of the program: to provide winter warmth, seasonal services, shelter supplies, and disaster relief, and to support tribal readiness to respond when disaster strikes situation: with climate change driving more frequently and damaging disasters such as flooding, forest fires, blizzards, and tornadoes, pwna is a critical first responder for the reservations. We also build capacity of native communities to plan, train, and respond to such events when they strike locally. Winter warmth is always a concern for the elders too. Homelessness is rising disproportionately among tribal citizens. Native americans face overcrowding 8 time more often than whites. 40% of native americans live in substandard-homes, and on any given night, more than 21,000 are homeless (sheltered, unsheltered). In addition, lack of access to clean drinking water (continued on schedule o)

    $3,902,396 spentof which $1,869,424 as grants$76,409 earned by the program
    25% of program spending
  3. Food & water: purpose of the program: to ease food insecurity by increasing the local food supply for native american elders, children, and families, and supporting food sovereignty through gardening and local access to healthy foods on the reservations we serve situation: food on the table is a basic human right, but it's not that simple for the people pwna serves. With more americans now experiencing food insecurity and food hardship, they are realizing for the first time what native americans have been up against since the reservations began in 1851. Low food security - defined as insufficient food quality or variety for dietary health - has impacted reservations for decades, fueling high rates of nutrition-related diseases such as diabetes and obesity because less expensive foods tend to have more fat and carbohydrates. (continued on schedule o)

    $1,391,396 spentof which $640,463 as grants
    9% of program spending
  4. Holiday: purpose of the program: to help our reservation partners spread community cheer, engagement, and active involvement at times when families may be experiencing more disenfranchisement and seasonal stress situation: the holidays can be an extra hardship for native families in our service area. The elders and children on the reservations pwna serves are certainly aware of holidays celebrated across the u.s., but so often, families cannot afford holiday gifts or celebrations. Native child poverty rates have consistently exceeded 40% for the past 30 years. In fact, compared to whites, native children are over three times as likely to experience deep poverty. About half of native grandparents are raising grandchildren while living on social security - and native joblessness is twice that of whites. The overall rate of impoverishment across the hundreds of tribal communities pwna serves ranges from 15% to 54%. Pwna response: happy holidays contribute to overall well-being. During the 2025 holidays, pwna helped program partners spread holiday cheer by delivering stockings and holiday gift bags filled with practical items. These gifts delighted 11,131 children and elders across 25…

    $1,131,648 spentof which $646,985 as grants
    7% of program spending
  5. Education services: purpose of the program: to increase resources for native american education, support access and retention of native students from pre-kindergarten through college, and support leadership development situation: education is a cornerstone of economic mobility. However, due to systemic failures and unrealized treaty promises, half of native american students are not finishing high school. About 8% of native students attend reservation schools operated by the bureau of indian education (bie) or operated by tribes with bie funding. Like the indian health service, federally run bie schools are understaffed and underfunded, leaving students with the lowest reading scores in america. Native students who graduate high school then face barriers to higher education, such as poverty and racial discrimination - even while the general, non-native public believes college is free for native americans. Only 19% of native americans aged 18-24 start college, and only 16% of native americans hold a college degree (compared to 40% of whites). The digital divide is also a barrier, as 65% of all jobs in the economy require post-secondary education or training beyond high school,…

    $866,129 spentof which $122,590 as grants$6,500 earned by the program
    6% of program spending
  6. Animal welfare: purpose of the program: to support programs concerned with animal welfare and related human health risks in remote, underserved tribal communities situation: indigenous peoples have a long history of relationship with animals; more than just pets, they are regarded as relatives in native cultures. But today, as families struggle with poverty, so too do the animals, and the problems arising from strays and overpopulation are immense for some reservations. Peta cites that, in just 6 years, one female dog and her offspring can produce 67,000 pups; in just 7 years, one female cat and her offspring can produce 370,000 kittens. The reservations we serve are unable to care for that many animals, so some partners hold spay/neuter clinics monthly. Still, about 88% of pets living in underserved communities have not been spayed/neutered, and 69% have never seen a veterinarian. On top of this, reservation shelters are congested because people who adopted during the pandemic brought the dogs back when they returned to work. Our reservation partners still hope to find homes for each one. Pwna response: pwna's reservation animal rescue (rar) program supports groups that rescue,…

    $311,402 spentof which $165,015 as grants
    2% of program spending
  7. Public education: purpose of the program: to provide accurate information about native american history, modern-day life on the reservations, and pwna programs and impact, while addressing persistent misconceptions that hinder opportunity and equity for native peoples situation: the need for america to become more nativeaware has never been greater. Harmful stereotypes and lack of accurate information about native people, history, issues, and funding contribute to racial/social inequity and inadequate support for tribal communities. Many americans believe native americans receive free housing and healthcare, go to college for free or receive a government check every month just for being native. So, for all the billions given for philanthropy in the united states, less than one-half of 1 percent is aiding native american causes. Meanwhile, tribal nations face challenges that stem directly from broken treaties, a census undercount that limits federal funding to tribes, and systemic failures in the education system that are detrimental to native students. Amidst the rich culture and unity of tribal communities, americans quickly forget the spotlight that covid-19 shined on food and…

The 7 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $15,387,017.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($41M) Expenses 100 ($38M) Net assets 100 ($22M)2018 Revenue 68 ($28M) Expenses 83 ($32M) Net assets 81 ($18M)2019 Revenue 58 ($24M) Expenses 64 ($25M) Net assets 77 ($17M)2020 Revenue 111 ($45M) Expenses 71 ($27M) Net assets 159 ($35M)2021 Revenue 71 ($29M) Expenses 86 ($33M) Net assets 142 ($31M)2022 Revenue 61 ($25M) Expenses 74 ($28M) Net assets 128 ($28M)2023 Revenue 57 ($23M) Expenses 61 ($23M) Net assets 128 ($28M)2024 Revenue 67 ($28M) Expenses 62 ($24M) Net assets 146 ($32M)2025 Revenue 67 ($27M) Expenses 61 ($23M) Net assets 166 ($36M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (67)Expenses (61)Net assets (166)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $18M to $36M (+107%).

$23M
$19M
$18M
$36M
$32M
$30M
$29M
$33M
$38M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 19% · 2021 7% · 2025 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,405 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$2.5M
’17
−$4.2M
’18
−$888k
’19
$18M
’20
−$3.7M
’21
−$3.1M
’22
$80k
’23
$3.9M
’24
$4.1M
’25
5.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Joshua Arce

President & CEO

Board chair

Corey Mzhickteno

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'24'25
Listed1917151414131415
Joined·+1+1+3+4+1·+3
No longer listed·33442·2
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 11 funders to 44 funders, grant income rose $109k → $1.6M.

31 of 141 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 37% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 141 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

44% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS.

27%
largest funder
42%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 41% · 2018 78% · 2019 41% · 2020 25% · 2021 18% · 2022 27% · 2023 44% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

31% of PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 43% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 36 states in all.

VT
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 20 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,396 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin15% · top quartile
Months of reserve5.0mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−5% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,396 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Organizations like PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

66% of spending goes to programs.

Program 66%Management 8%Fundraising 26%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 51 states

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS?
PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS (Texas) receives grants from 141 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,396,100 to it, the largest being MARGARET A CARGILL FOUNDATION ($2,300,000). 61 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS have?
IRS filings report 141 organizations giving $8,396,100 in grants to PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS, 61 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS?
MARGARET A CARGILL FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,300,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 141 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing