How much did IMAGO DEI FUND grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of IMAGO DEI FUND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

socialmothers

2021

mothers

2022

impact

2023

collaborativeimmigrantfaith

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 126 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k25 grants · $710k
$50k–250k86 grants · $9.0M
$250k+15 grants · $5.4M

$83,332

Median grant

States reached

$113M

Total assets

Largest grants

OTHER GRANTS$769,206
WORLD RELIEF CORPORATION$500,000
POLARIS PROJECT$400,000
SPARK MICROGRANTS$400,000
PRAXIS$333,334
YOUNG LIFE$333,334
TEARFUND$333,334
WORLD VISION$333,334
BEYOND BORDERS$300,000
FLORESTA USA INC (PLANT WITH PURPOSE)$300,000
EMERGENCY FUND$291,000
EMMANUEL GOSPEL CENTER$285,000
LWALA COMMUINITY ALLIANCE$266,666
AFRICAN ROAD$260,000
TOSTAN$250,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$56M · 155 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

155 repeat relationships — 100 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

155

Total granted

$56M

$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%

+328%

Still filing today

44%

48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WORLD VISION
3× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +43%
T
TOSTAN
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +4%
SM
SPARK MICROGRANTS
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +280%

Funded once

EC
EPISCOPAL CITY MISSION
one grant, 2021 · $200k
WINDWARD FUNDgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +2336%
MA
MONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN SOLIDARITYgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +1984%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

She-Can Global Inc

SHE-CAN equips and inspires low-opportunity women from post-conflict and climate-challenged countries to become impact leaders who individually and collectively change their nations and create pathways for future female leaders.

Education

World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services

Shift Project Ltd

Shift works across all continents and sectors to challenge assumptions, push boundaries and redefine corporate practice in order to build a world where business gets done with respect for peoples dignity. Our work is based on the…

International

Global Strategies

Global Strategies empowers communities in the most neglected areas of the world to improve the lives of women and children through healthcare.

Health

Speak Up for the Poor

Speak Up exists to transform the world on behalf of the poor. Our mission is to create a new reality for girls in poverty. We work toward this goal through educational programs support of safe homes and practical legal work.

International

Maia

Unlocking and maximizing the potential of young women to lead transformational change.

International

Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International

She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future.

International

Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International

Tirzah International

Tirzah international partners with a network of global female leaders to create opportunities for women to discover their god-given potential through micro-enterprise, leadership development, and local sustainability initiatives.

Religion

Habibi International

Habibi International seeks to transform the lives of refugees and internal displaced persons in the Middle East with the love of Jesus by providing humanitarian relief and sustainable development in partnership with local churches and NGOs

International

One Days Wages

One Day's Wages is a grassroots movement dedicated to alleviating extreme global poverty.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nomi Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Global Impact. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%1/115

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,450

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

103 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

101/103

Grantees still filing

73/103

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$38,153,335International$12,730,933Human Services$3,103,600Crime & Legal$2,435,000Education$2,285,167Philanthropy$2,062,867Recreation & Sports$1,243,167

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA42.4× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · The Church Home Society Inc · The Fish Family Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Richard & Susan Smith Family Foundation · Wagner Foundation · Boston Charitable Trust Fund · Yawkey Foundation II · Nellie Mae Education Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation IMAGO DEI FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

30get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FELLOWSHIP OF HAITIAN EVANGELICAL PASTORS OF NEW ENGLAND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 832109601 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FELLOWSHIP OF HAITIAN EVANGELICAL PASTORS OF NEW ENGLAND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 60% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Imago Dei Fund?

Find your warmest path to Imago Dei Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

IMAGO DEI FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

103 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Imago Dei Fund?

More from the funding graph

IMAGO DEI FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

103 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Imago Dei Fund?

More from the funding graph