· Private foundation
Segal Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k252 grants · $6.7M
- $50k–250k86 grants · $5.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BASEFLOW | $124,400 |
| PI FOUNDATION | $117,000 |
| WANDIKWEZA | $105,000 |
| TEACHUNITED | $100,500 |
| SPARK MICROGRANTS | $100,000 |
| SANERGY INC | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $92,006 |
| CLINICO | $91,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $87,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $86,500 |
| LADDER TO LEARNING (MAKWELERO) | $86,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $82,500 |
| REACH FOR UGANDA | $81,500 |
| MUKISA FOUNDATION | $78,500 |
| KYANINGA CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE | $77,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 46% of grant dollars ($37M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 54% that went abroad ($44M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 54% of all-years giving ($44M)
26 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 35% of Segal Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
388 repeat relationships — 266 still active in FY2024, 122 since wound down; 78 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGOULD FAMILY FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +285% · 86% of their budget
- LCLwala Community Alliance6× · 2017–2024 · $542k · revenue +462%
- SMSPARK MICROGRANTS INC5× · 2019–2024 · $502k · revenue +216%
Funded once
- CFCENTRE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2021 · $530k
- LMLast Mile Healthone grant, 2017 · $269k
- KLKomo Learning Centresone grant, 2017 · $202k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A is for Africa is an educational foundation focusing education and health among the Maasai people of Tanzania East Africa. Our primary work involves providing educational support to the local government schools in the way of a school…
Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…
Promote health and wellness globally for women and kids
The mission of the go fund is to provide vulnerable women and children in africa with the skills, resources and opportunities they need to lift themselves permanently out of poverty.
To strengthen young women's civic participation and leadership
Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…
Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.
The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.
Support secondary education in 5 African countries
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Village Enterprise Fund and the most unlike its peers is Gould Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 736 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOULD FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KOMO LEARNING CENTRES ↗
- Who funds GARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Soul Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Lwala Community Alliance ↗
- Who funds SPARK MICROGRANTS INC ↗
- Who funds MOTHER HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds AMANI GLOBAL WORKS ↗
- Who funds PRINCETON IN AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S INSTITUTE FOR SECONDARY EDUCATION & RESEARCH INT'L INC ↗
- Who funds JACARANDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JITEGEMEE INC ↗
- Who funds Access Inc ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Imago Dei Fund · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Mulago Foundation · Rippleworks Inc · 128 Collective Foundation · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · The Issroff Family Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · Gates Foundation · Skoll Fund · The Skoll Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Segal Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Maranyundo Initiative Inc — 85% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Segal Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Segal Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.