Loading…
Loading…
Puerto Rico · Nonprofit
INTERCAMBIOS PUERTO RICO INC (Puerto Rico) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,787,892 in grants to it, the largest being DIRECT RELIEF ($1,492,554). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
INTERCAMBIOS PUERTO RICO INC has grown faster than half of the 7,809 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,809 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
98% of INTERCAMBIOS PUERTO RICO INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (52% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $46k → $151k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of INTERCAMBIOS PUERTO RICO INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
INTERCAMBIOS PUERTO RICO INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 60% · 2019 58% · 2020 50% · 2021 95% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% · 2024 99% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
INTERCAMBIOS PUERTO RICO INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Puerto Rico — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 4 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.0M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
95% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Part of a family of 1 related entity
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2022–2023), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing