Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Together Women Rise

TOGETHER WOMEN RISE champions gender equality because womens rights are human rights.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

International$3.6MHuman Services$893kEducation$803kHealth$766kCivil Rights$585kCommunity Improvement$320kEnvironment$310kEmployment$217kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22 grants below total $1,053,615 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,076,740 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,125 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $825k
$50,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHARED INTEREST$110,000
EQUIMUNDO$75,000
LANDESA$75,000
EQUALITY NOW$75,000
SAVE THE RAIN$60,000
KAKENYA'S DREAM$60,000
ASANTE AFRICA FOUNDATION$60,000
REFUSHE (FORMALLY HESHIMA KENYA)$60,000
LOTUS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL$50,000
MAIA$50,000
FOR THE GOOD$50,000
KUPONA FOUNDATION$50,000
VIDEO VOLUNTEERS$50,000
ASIA INITIATIVES$48,000
GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS$45,615
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS INTERNATION INC: $50k → 9%EVERFREE: $50k → 10%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $50k → 11%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $50k → 14%SHE'S THE FIRST: $50k → 17%CATALYST FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%BURMA HUMANITARIAN MISSION: $47k → 8%BLINKNOW FOUNDATION: $25k → 4%WUQU KAWOQMAYA HEALTH ALLIANCE: $50k → 9%READ GLOBAL: $49k → 10%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $10k → 11%CATALYST FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%AFRICA DEVELOPMENT PROMIS: $45k → 12%BLINKNOW FOUNDATION: $25k → 4%CATALYST FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%LAST MILE4D: $48k → 14%EQUIMUNDO: $100k → 14%EQUIMUNDO: $100k → 14%EQUIMUNDO: $75k → 14%YAMBA MALAWI: $50k → 17%EQUIMUNDO: $75k → 14%GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC: $50k → 17%GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS: $46k → 17%ASIA INITIATIVES: $48k → 17%ASIA INITIATIVES: $47k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.1M · 39 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
80

Total granted

$4.1M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
98%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $440k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    3× · 2017–2019 · $300k · revenue +76%
  • EN
    Equality Now Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $275k · revenue +59%
  • KC
    KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE
    2× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +512%

Funded once

  • BA
    BABIES AND MOTHERS ALIVE USA INCORPORATE
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +12%
  • AW
    AFRICAN WOMEN RISINGgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +172%
  • WW
    Women Win Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
2
Women in Progress Inc

Women in Progress dba Global Mamas works to achieve economic independence of African women and alleviate poverty at a grassroots level by creating jobs and income generation opportunities that generate a sustainable, living wage and at the…

Community Improvement
3
Global Girls Global Women Inc

A 503C3 Organization design to equip suffering girls and women around the world by helping them gain access to quality healthcare, education and economic empowerment initiatives aimed to foster self-este

Recreation & Sports
4
Girls Education Collaborative Inc

GEC partners with locally-led organizations to catalyze and support sustainable, community-driven solutions that remove social, economic, and gender-based barriers keeping girls out of school in under-resourced regions of the global south.

International
5
Educate Girls

Educate Girls promotes and protects the right of girls to a quality education and works by supporting partners in geographies where the need is greatest to mobilize communities, enroll girls into school and improve learning outcomes. Our…

International
6
Together Women Rise

Together women rise champions gender equality because womens rights are human rights. when women and girls are treated equally, the world is healthier, safer, more peaceful, inclusive, and economically just for everyone.

Philanthropy
7
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
8
Circle of Health International

COHIs mission is to work with women and their communities in times of crisis and disaster to ensure access to quality reproductive, maternal and newborn care. See Sch O for full mission.

—
9
Adara Development (Usa)

Our mission is to bridge the world of business and the world of people in extreme poverty, and to support vulnerable communities with health, education and other essential services

International
10
Splash International

The mission of Splash International and its subsidiaries is to ensure clean water for children. Splash partners with governments and local organizations to deliver sustainable water, sanitation, hygiene, and menstrual health programs in…

Environment
11
Mothers Without Borders

Mothers Without Borders is dedicated to fostering resilience and self-sufficiency in developing countries through a holistic approach to community empowerment, particularly focusing on the most vulnerable women, youth, and children. Our…

Health
12
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amplify Girls Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catalyst Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Domestic Violence ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Local Food System Organizat…Community Arts CentersCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%57%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%1%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%52%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/132
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,433

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

131 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 131 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
130/131
Grantees still filing
84/131
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $300,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFEquality Now Inc — $275,000 · InternationalEquality Now IncINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON WOMEN — $200,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON WOMENSHARED INTEREST INC — $194,500 · International+54 more — $2,718,038 · International+54 moreEQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUS — $350,000 · Human ServicesEQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR…HER FUTURE COALITION INC — $98,398 · Human ServicesHER FUTURE COALITION…GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC — $95,510 · Human ServicesGLOBAL FUND FOR WIDO…Asia Initiatives — $95,414 · Human ServicesAsia InitiativesCATALYST FOUNDATION — $75,000 · Human ServicesONE HEART WORLDWIDE — $60,000 · Human ServicesAFRICAN WOMEN RISING — $50,000 · Human ServicesYAMBA MALAWI INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesFriends International Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesEDUCATE THE CHILDREN INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesWillow International Everfree — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE PANGEA NETWORK — $50,000 · Human ServicesWuqu Kawoq SA — $50,000 · Human ServicesBLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT — $50,000 · Human ServicesSHE'S THE FIRST INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesRURAL EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT INC — $48,701 · Human Services+4 more — $180,276 · Human Services+4 moreKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE — $105,000 · EducationLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC — $100,000 · EducationBABIES AND MOTHERS ALIVE USA INCORPORATE — $50,000 · EducationEducate2Envision International Inc — $50,000 · EducationPROJECT ZAWADI INC — $50,000 · EducationWOMENS GLOBAL EDUCATION PROJECT — $48,766 · EducationWomens Justice Initiative Inc — $45,000 · EducationRAZIAS RAY OF HOPE FOUNDATION — $41,040 · EducationORGANIZATION FOR YOUTH EMPOWERMENT — $40,000 · EducationKOMERA INC — $35,000 · EducationTHE BARKA FOUNDATION INC — $34,991 · EducationGROWTH THROUGH LEARNING INC — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $20,000 · EducationGAIA VACCINE FOUNDATION — $100,876 · HealthIntegrate Health Inc — $75,000 · HealthThe Fistula Foundation — $70,000 · HealthSAFE HANDS FOR GIRLS INC — $50,000 · HealthMAYA MIDWIFERY INTERNATIONAL INC — $50,000 · HealthVENTURE STRATEGIES FOR HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT DBA OASIS — $49,999 · HealthJACARANDA HEALTH — $47,000 · HealthKENYA SELF-HELP PROJECT — $44,990 · HealthVILLAGE HEALTH PARTNERSHIP — $40,800 · HealthHealth in Harmony — $40,000 · HealthSECOND MILE HAITI — $40,000 · HealthNOORA HEALTH — $35,000 · HealthRURAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $350,000 · Community ImprovementFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementMALI HEALTH ORGANIZING PROJECT INC — $45,378 · Community ImprovementMINDLEAPS — $98,840 · Arts & CultureBOND STREET THEATRE COALITION LTD — $75,000 · Arts & CultureCARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC — $65,000 · Arts & CultureVIDEO VOLUNTEERS — $50,000 · Arts & CultureToo Young to Wed Inc — $50,000 · Arts & CultureDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc — $50,000 · OtherCHICUCHAS WASI — $50,000 · OtherRESOLVE — $50,000 · OtherShadhika Project — $40,000 · OtherTOMORROW'S WOMEN — $38,525 · OtherWOMENS MICROFINANCE INITIATIVE — $75,000 · OtherWOMENS MICROF…MAJI SAFI GROUP — $49,995 · OtherBATONGA FOUNDATION — $48,099 · OtherCaravan to Class — $42,260 · OtherCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $35,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CLOUD FOREST CONSERVATION — $75,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CLO…Kula Project Inc — $60,000 · OtherKula Project …AFRICAN PEOPLE & WILDLIFE FUND INC — $75,000 · OtherAFRICAN PEOPL…International Action Network For Gender Equity and Law IANGEL — $60,000 · OtherInternational…NO MEANS NO WORLDWIDE — $50,000 · OtherLOTUS OUTREACH — $50,000 · OtherSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS — $41,500 · OtherTERREWODE WOMENS FUND — $35,000 · Other+3 more — $75,000 · Other+3 more
International$3,687,538Human Services$1,453,299Education$644,797Health$643,665Community Improvement$445,378Arts & Culture$338,840Other$1,000,379

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRURAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $350,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetEQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUS — $350,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEquality Now Inc — $275,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON WOMEN — $200,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSHARED INTEREST INC — $194,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE — $105,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetGAIA VACCINE FOUNDATION — $100,876 over 2y, 25% of budgetLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC — $100,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetSTREET CHILD US — $99,071 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetMINDLEAPS — $98,840 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetHER FUTURE COALITION INC — $98,398 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC — $95,510 over 2y, 21% of budgetSACRED VALLEY HEALTH — $84,088 over 2y, 20% of budgetSPEAK UP FOR THE POOR — $76,189 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetGRANDMOTHER PROJECT INC — $75,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetHEALTHRIGHT INTERNATIONAL INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCATALYST FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetIntegrate Health Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWOMENS MICROFINANCE INITIATIVE — $75,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetBOND STREET THEATRE COALITION LTD — $75,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLOUD FOREST CONSERVATION — $75,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetRIPPLE AFRICA INC — $75,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetCOLLATERAL REPAIR PROJECT — $75,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetGARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetAFRICAN PEOPLE & WILDLIFE FUND INC — $75,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC — $65,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetONE HEART WORLDWIDE — $60,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAsante Africa Foundation Inc — $60,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetKula Project Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetSave The Rain Inc — $60,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetInternational Action Network For Gender Equity and Law IANGEL — $60,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetFLYING KITES INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBABIES AND MOTHERS ALIVE USA INCORPORATE — $50,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetAFRICAN WOMEN RISING — $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWomen Win Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetWOMENS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR GUATEMALAN SOLUTIONS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetYAMBA MALAWI INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKupona Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 71% of budgetEDUCATE THE CHILDREN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWillow International Everfree — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVIDEO VOLUNTEERS — $50,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetADVANCING GIRLS EDUCATION IN AFRICA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE PANGEA NETWORK — $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNO MEANS NO WORLDWIDE — $50,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMAIA — $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Globalgiving Foundati…Circle of Sisterhood …One Days WagesWeyerhaeuser Family F…Stone Family Foundati…Dovetail Impact Found…Kathryn B McQuade Fou…Novo FoundationTides FoundationSegal Family Foundati…Marin Community Found…Gofundmeorg
Globalgiving Foundation IncDC68.3× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Circle of Sisterhood Foundation Inc · One Days Wages · Weyerhaeuser Family Foundationinc · Stone Family Foundation · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Kathryn B McQuade Foundation · Novo Foundation · Tides Foundation · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Gofundmeorg

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Together Women Rise funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • African People & Wildlife Fund Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Dominican Republic Education and Mentoring Project Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home