· Private foundation
Kathryn B McQuade Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k75 grants · $1.8M
- $50k–250k5 grants · $357k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| WOMEN'S GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT FUND | $75,000 |
| AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND | $57,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC INC | $50,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF FONDWA USA INC | $49,000 |
| TEACH UNITED | $47,000 |
| YWCA OF THE CENTRAL CAROLINAS INC | $40,000 |
| SAINT ANN FOUNDATION US CHAPTER | $40,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA | $36,000 |
| FINEMIND | $35,000 |
| STREET BUSINESS SCHOOL | $35,000 |
| TECHNOSERVE INC | $35,000 |
| POLARIS | $30,000 |
| UNFCU FOUNDATION INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 60 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WMWilliam & Mary Foundation6× · 2020–2025 · $750k · revenue +116%
- WGWOMENS GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT FUND7× · 2019–2025 · $548k · revenue +1% · 45% of their budget
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND6× · 2019–2025 · $324k · revenue +138%
Funded once
- COCOLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY FOUDATIONone grant, 2019 · $125k
- GFGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +53%
- AIAKASHINGA INCone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Women in Progress dba Global Mamas works to achieve economic independence of African women and alleviate poverty at a grassroots level by creating jobs and income generation opportunities that generate a sustainable, living wage and at the…
MAIA is creating a generation of empowered leaders who have the knowledge and resources they need to lead choice-filled lives, break cycles of poverty, and ignite transformational change in their communities.
Together women rise champions gender equality because womens rights are human rights. when women and girls are treated equally, the world is healthier, safer, more peaceful, inclusive, and economically just for everyone.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
Speak Up exists to transform the world on behalf of the poor. Our mission is to create a new reality for girls in poverty. We work toward this goal through educational programs support of safe homes and practical legal work.
The mission of the go fund is to provide vulnerable women and children in africa with the skills, resources and opportunities they need to lift themselves permanently out of poverty.
Educate Girls promotes and protects the right of girls to a quality education and works by supporting partners in geographies where the need is greatest to mobilize communities, enroll girls into school and improve learning outcomes. Our…
The mission of Splash International and its subsidiaries is to ensure clean water for children. Splash partners with governments and local organizations to deliver sustainable water, sanitation, hygiene, and menstrual health programs in…
Shadhika believes in a future where each person in India can choose their own path to meaning, purpose, and happiness. Through global philanthropy and in-country programming, Shadhika believes that education is the most effective vehicle…
Mothers Without Borders is dedicated to fostering resilience and self-sufficiency in developing countries through a holistic approach to community empowerment, particularly focusing on the most vulnerable women, youth, and children. Our…
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
With Women Kisoboka focuses on gender equity, women's economic empowerment, and change in their community as a solution to the longstanding poverty in Uganda. Through women's entrepreneurship, we help women grow their business knowledge,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ahala Children's Rights Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
217 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 217 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds William & Mary Foundation ↗
- Who funds WOMENS GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds Young Womens Christian Association of the Central Carolinas Inc ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds TEACHUNITED ↗
- Who funds AHALA CHILDREN'S RIGHTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT ↗
- Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
- Who funds FLYING KITES INC ↗
- Who funds Unlocking Communities Inc ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of the Piedmont Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds STRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds FINEMIND ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MAGNOLIA GLOBAL ACADEMY FOR LEADERS ↗
- Who funds FONKOZE USA INC ↗
- Who funds ONE YARD AWAY INC ↗
- Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds STREET BUSINESS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds MINORITY HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICA EXCHANGE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Together Women Rise · Circle of Sisterhood Foundation Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · One Days Wages · Imago Dei Fund · Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Gates Foundation · Cpps Heritage Mission Fund · The West Foundation Inc · Bright Funds Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kathryn B McQuade Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ocean's Harbor House Inc — 75% of income from government
- Pan African Sanctuary Alliance Inc — 68% of income from government
- Center for Adoption Support and Education Inc — 51% of income from government
- Mothers for Justice and Equality Inc — 43% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.