Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Givinga Foundation Inc

Our mission is to empower donors of all sizes through a transparent and accountable public charity platform that provides access to world class giving accounts and promotes active and consistent giving.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
424
Grants FY2024still arriving
41
States reached
$950k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$5.0MInternational$4.8MHuman Services$4.2MEducation$2.5MPhilanthropy$2.1MHousing & Shelter$1.7MFood & Nutrition$1.1MYouth Development$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 424 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 424 grants below total $8,509,507 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $11,091,205 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,581,698 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k188 grants · $1.3M
  • $10k–50k210 grants · $3.6M
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$10,000
Median grant
41
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOGETHER WE THRIVE FOUNDATION$950,000
RED WING ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER$265,900
MEMPHIS-SHELBY CRIME COMMISSION$252,000
PERCENT IMPACT FOUNDATION$179,886
SLINGSHOT MEMPHIS INC$172,675
GLOBAL GIVING$160,637
GIVINGA FOUNDATION$144,641
MEMPHIS INNER CITY RUGBY$110,000
MEMPHIS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$105,000
MEANING FOUNDATION$103,130
FIRST TENNESSEE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOUNDATION$101,875
READING IS FUNDAMENTAL$100,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA$100,000
FRIENDS OF THE GOODHUE COUNTY FAIR$100,000
NATIONAL CIVIL RIGHTS MUSEUM$85,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELWYN FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $40k → 10%HISPANIC-AMERICAN INSITUTE INC: $12k → 14%HOOAH INC: $13k → 8%NRIVA INC: $25k → 11%FIRST TENNESSEE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $102k → 14%COX EMPLOYEE RELIEF FUND INC: $46k → 13%CORNERSTONES INC: $15k → 6%MISSION OF DEEDS INC: $20k → 8%TICONDEROGA AREA BACKPACK PROGRAM: $13k → 13%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $24k → 8%NRIVA INC: $14k → 11%GAMES FOR LOVE: $1.1M → 9%ARMED SERVICES YMCA HEADQUARTERS: $13k → 7%TICONDEROGA AREA BACKPACK PROGRAM: $12k → 13%THE SHOEBOX PROJECT FOR SHELTERS: $11k → 13%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $15k → 8%GAMES FOR LOVE: $533k → 9%ANCHOR HOUSE INC: $15k → 11%MISSION OF DEEDS INC: $20k → 8%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $14k → 8%GAMES FOR LOVE: $216k → 9%ANCHOR HOUSE INC: $15k → 11%GAMES FOR LOVE: $179k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%GAMES FOR LOVE: $45k → 9%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $43k → 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $14k → 14%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $39k → 8%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $33k → 8%RED WING IGNITE: $30k → 9%HOPE & HARBOR HOMELESS SHELTER: $21k → 9%DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%HOPE & HARBOR HOMELESS SHELTER: $20k → 9%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $100k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $222k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $16k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $11k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $56k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $23k → 14%MEANING FOUNDATION: $103k → 14%CHILDREN OF WAR FOUNDATION: $33k → 14%ELIZABETH STONE HOUSE: $20k → 16%TRINITYS SERVICES AND FOOD FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $12k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $27k → 17%BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $32k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $18k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $12k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 229 repeat orgs$9.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

229 repeat relationships — 183 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 227 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

229
356

Total granted

$17M
$5.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+16%

Still filing today

90%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +37%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR THE DAY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $808k · revenue +0% · 51% of their budget
  • TE
    TRANS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $382k · revenue +27% · 61% of their budget

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLUBHOUSE DEVELOPMENT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $235k · revenue -38%
  • TB
    THE BOOT CAMPAIGN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $232k · revenue +36%
  • PA
    PROMOTING AMWARENESS VICTIM EMPOWERMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $205k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
8
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnited Way AffiliatesYouth Sports ProgramsYouth Development CentersYouth Development ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringPregnancy Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity FoundationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Ymca Youth DevelopmentAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Local Food System Organizat…Community Arts CentersSenior Support ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsDevelopmental Disabilities …Independent K-12 SchoolsImmigrant Worker SupportPublic Library OperationsYouth Mentoring ProgramsLocal History MuseumsChristian Youth CampsCommunity College Foundatio…Domestic Violence ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…School District FoundationsCommunity Food PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Construc…Animal Rescue and ShelterFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Women & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyAddiction Recovery ServicesCommunity FoundationsSchool Parent OrganizationsMilitary Veterans SupportCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%6/802
the rest of the field
13%
240,390/1,818,763

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

718 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 718 of the 839 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

22
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
67
Early backer (in before they grew)
707/718
Grantees still filing
437/718
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,113,765 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSI…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $226,629 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTI…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $225,301 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDAT…GIVE2ASIA — $160,904 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $151,774 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $138,840 · International+16 more — $997,986 · International+16 moreGames For Love — $2,044,492 · Human ServicesGames For LoveAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $267,891 · Human ServicesAmerican National R…COVENANT HOUSE — $248,310 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE+21 more — $1,208,001 · Human Services+21 moreHOPE FOR THE DAY — $807,953 · HealthHOPE FOR THE DAYAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $379,141 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER S…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $304,624 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…HILARITY FOR CHARITY INC — $300,000 · HealthHILARITY FOR CHAR…INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLUBHOUSE DEVELOPMENT INC — $235,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL CEN…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $171,849 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $140,239 · HealthCURE RARE DISEASE INC — $116,766 · Health+17 more — $980,439 · Health+17 moreRED WING ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER — $265,900 · OtherCOMPASS WORKING CAPITAL INC — $248,196 · OtherTRANS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC — $381,755 · OtherTRANS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INCMEMPHISSHELBY CRIME COMMISSION — $252,000 · OtherTHE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC — $231,678 · Other+77 more — $5,359,779 · Other+77 moreTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND — $431,671 · PhilanthropyTHE BLACK…SLINGSHOT MEMPHIS INC — $234,795 · PhilanthropySLINGSHOT…PERCENT IMPACT FOUNDATION — $179,886 · PhilanthropyPERCENT I…VISIT ORG PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $152,788 · PhilanthropyVISIT ORG…GIVINGA FOUNDATION INC — $144,641 · PhilanthropyGIVINGA F…SchoolSeed Foundation — $100,000 · PhilanthropyEO COMPANIES — $100,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER LONGVIEW UNITED WAY INC — $90,000 · PhilanthropyPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION — $64,406 · Philanthropy+10 more — $389,557 · Philanthropy+10 moreFRIENDS OF THE GOODHUE COUNTY FAIR — $200,150 · EducationTHE DEL PASO FOUNDATION — $105,925 · EducationREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC — $100,000 · EducationYEAR UP INC — $69,331 · EducationCREEKSTONE MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $59,975 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $58,062 · EducationCOLINS HOPE — $54,800 · EducationBUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL — $52,800 · EducationDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $47,643 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $43,299 · Education+13 more — $401,773 · EducationTOGETHER WE THRIVE FOUNDATION — $950,000 · Community ImprovementMEMPHIS TOMORROW — $50,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $64,083 · Community Improvement
International$4,015,199Human Services$3,768,694Health$3,436,011Other$6,739,308Philanthropy$1,887,744Education$1,243,758Community Improvement$1,064,083

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,113,765 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGames For Love — $2,044,492 over 5y, 95% of budgetTOGETHER WE THRIVE FOUNDATION — $950,000 over 1y, 88% of budgetHOPE FOR THE DAY — $807,953 over 4y, 51% of budgetTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND — $431,671 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRANS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC — $381,755 over 4y, 61% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $379,141 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $304,624 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILARITY FOR CHARITY INC — $300,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $267,891 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRED WING ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER — $265,900 over 1y, 41% of budgetMEMPHISSHELBY CRIME COMMISSION — $252,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $248,310 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMPASS WORKING CAPITAL INC — $248,196 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLUBHOUSE DEVELOPMENT INC — $235,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetSLINGSHOT MEMPHIS INC — $234,795 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetTHE BOOT CAMPAIGN INC — $231,678 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $226,629 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $225,301 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $218,714 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GOODHUE COUNTY FAIR — $200,150 over 2y, 64% of budgetPERCENT IMPACT FOUNDATION — $179,886 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSTREET DREAMZ FOUNDATION INC — $177,299 over 3y, 52% of budgetFeeding America — $177,158 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $171,849 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLorraine Civil Rights Museum Foundation — $170,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGIVE2ASIA — $160,904 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GOODHUEWABASHA & PIERCE COUNTIES — $160,451 over 2y, 19% of budgetMOUNTAIN MISSION INC — $160,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetRISEUP PARTNERSHIP — $154,166 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $154,123 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVISIT ORG PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $152,788 over 1y, 13% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $151,774 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIVINGA FOUNDATION INC — $144,641 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $140,239 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $138,840 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $126,924 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $125,036 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEMPHIS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $118,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCURE RARE DISEASE INC — $116,766 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $116,661 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $115,799 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAPS CHARITIES INC — $114,947 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $114,502 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $110,420 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMemphis Inner City Rugby — $110,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetRed Wing Arts Association — $108,340 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetProject Helping — $104,828 over 3y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Red Wing Shoe Company…The Jones Family Foun…Jr Hyde III Family Fo…Analog Devices Founda…Thomas W Briggs Found…American Tower Corpor…The Kemmons Wilson Fa…Cambridge Savings Cha…Bristol-Myers Squibb …LPL Financial Foundat…Eastman Credit UnionThe Assisi Foundation…
Red Wing Shoe Company FoundationMN29.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Red Wing Shoe Company Foundation · The Jones Family Foundation · Jr Hyde III Family Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · LPL Financial Foundation Inc · Eastman Credit Union · The Assisi Foundation of Memphis Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Givinga Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Anchor House Inc — 45% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • North Shore Community Action Programs Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities Diocese of Metuchen — 3% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Compass Working Capital Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Open Storehouse Incorporated — 0% of income from government
  • Goucher College — 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Buckingham Browne & Nichols School — 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
44report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Givinga Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Givinga Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 839 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home